Contribute very little to the conversation

For all your silly time-killing forum games.

Moderators: jestingrabbit, Moderators General, Prelates

Lawsome
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon May 07, 2012 7:35 pm UTC

Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Lawsome » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:43 pm UTC

There is always that guy who has nothing to add to the conversation, but talks anyway. ITT, we are all that guy.
Spoiler:
Image
Quizatzhaderac wrote:
Rosewinsall wrote:DOWN WITH CERTAINTY!

Are you certain of that?

Moose Anus wrote:I let my wife think I'm watching porn in the bathroom late at night, but I'm really playing Dwarf Fortress instead.

User avatar
firesoul31
Posts: 93
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 10:30 pm UTC

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby firesoul31 » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:45 pm UTC

You know, I once knew a guy.
Pronouns: she/her/hers or they/them please.

Lawsome
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon May 07, 2012 7:35 pm UTC

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Lawsome » Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:45 pm UTC

firesoul31 wrote:You know, I once knew a guy.

Me too
Spoiler:
Image
Quizatzhaderac wrote:
Rosewinsall wrote:DOWN WITH CERTAINTY!

Are you certain of that?

Moose Anus wrote:I let my wife think I'm watching porn in the bathroom late at night, but I'm really playing Dwarf Fortress instead.

User avatar
poxic
Eloquently Prismatic
Posts: 4713
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 3:28 am UTC
Location: Left coast of Canada

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby poxic » Sat Sep 20, 2014 9:01 pm UTC

Also, I got cut off in traffic today. Some people really don't know how to drive, you know what I mean? Like, I know that we can't all be great people all the time and everything, but don't you really think that some people just don't know what's going on sometimes? Like really. Like the time I was at the grocery store yesterday. There was this woman whose cart was just blocking the whole aisle while she read the labels on every brand of apple juice or something. Like, come on lady, it's apple juice. Do you want apple juice or don't you? But her cart was right there in the middle of the aisle. I had to say "excuse me" to get by. Seriously.

Anyway, you were saying?
All empires fall.
Don't look back.
- The Secret Knots

User avatar
KingTip
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:20 pm UTC
Location: Desert Bluffs Greater Metropolitan Area

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby KingTip » Sun Sep 21, 2014 6:08 am UTC

WHAT DOES THE FOX SAY?
I'm baaaaaaaaack! ( <- sort of ironic cause I left for a little bit, but I might be back...)

Look around you
Strex.
Look inside you
Strex.
Go to sleep
Strex.
Believe in a smiling god.

StrexCorp.
It is everything.


...

User avatar
orangedragonfire
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 3:45 am UTC
Location: It exists. Probably.

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby orangedragonfire » Sun Sep 21, 2014 7:14 am UTC

KingTip wrote:WHAT DOES THE FOX SAY?


idk, what?

User avatar
Lazar
Landed Gentry
Posts: 2151
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:49 pm UTC
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Lazar » Sun Sep 21, 2014 7:33 am UTC

The fox said that thing that it said, after it said that other thing. The thing that it said (the second thing, not the first) is actually quite similar to something that a friend of mine told me once.
Exit the vampires' castle.

User avatar
bachaddict
Handel Played it Better
Posts: 484
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:18 am UTC
Location: Aotearoa

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby bachaddict » Sun Sep 21, 2014 7:45 am UTC

ditto
slinches wrote:Also, the OTC isn't a disease. In fact, it's the cure. As we all know, Time heals all wounds.

Thanks for the molpish wig ggh!
he/him/his

User avatar
KingTip
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:20 pm UTC
Location: Desert Bluffs Greater Metropolitan Area

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby KingTip » Sun Sep 21, 2014 4:49 pm UTC

Guess what. siiiiiiiiiiiiiiiixty niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiine
I'm baaaaaaaaack! ( <- sort of ironic cause I left for a little bit, but I might be back...)

Look around you
Strex.
Look inside you
Strex.
Go to sleep
Strex.
Believe in a smiling god.

StrexCorp.
It is everything.


...

Mike Rosoft
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:56 pm UTC
Location: Prague, Czech Republic

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Mike Rosoft » Sun Sep 21, 2014 5:33 pm UTC

That's what she said!

jazzman616
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 4:14 pm UTC

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby jazzman616 » Sun Sep 21, 2014 7:00 pm UTC

Hey, I know this might be off topic, but I have a new web site, and I'd love your support. It's justmadeitupforthisgame.com. Go check it out; it's great!
Who put the glad in gladiator?

User avatar
Envelope Generator
Posts: 582
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:07 am UTC
Location: pareidolia

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Envelope Generator » Mon Sep 22, 2014 4:16 am UTC

I couldn't be bothered.
I'm going to step off the LEM now... here we are, Pismo Beach and all the clams we can eat

eSOANEM wrote:If Fonzie's on the order of 100 zeptokelvin, I think he has bigger problems than difracting through doors.

User avatar
Vytron
Posts: 429
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:11 am UTC
Location: The Outside. I use She/He/Her/His/Him as gender neutral pronouns :P

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Vytron » Mon Sep 22, 2014 4:21 am UTC

I've tried it, really awesome! I recommend it to everyone!

(I'm talking about ketchup, of course)

User avatar
Adam H
Posts: 1267
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 6:36 pm UTC

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Adam H » Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:31 pm UTC

didn't read every post but I don't understand the point of this thread
-Adam

User avatar
patzer
Posts: 429
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2012 5:48 pm UTC
Contact:

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby patzer » Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:32 pm UTC

Adam H wrote:didn't read every post but I don't understand the point of this thread

ramen to that
If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family Anatidae on our hands. –Douglas Adams

User avatar
Whizbang
The Best Reporter
Posts: 2238
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 7:50 pm UTC
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Whizbang » Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:36 pm UTC

This reminds me of a book I read once where a boy is apprenticed to a wizard and he goes on a quest to save the world.

No, wait. It was a video game.

Wait. A fan fiction I read based off a video game based off a book.

Anyway, the OP's avatar made me think of that.

User avatar
Vytron
Posts: 429
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:11 am UTC
Location: The Outside. I use She/He/Her/His/Him as gender neutral pronouns :P

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Vytron » Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:56 pm UTC

+1

User avatar
SDK
Posts: 645
Joined: Thu May 22, 2014 7:40 pm UTC
Location: Canada

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby SDK » Mon Sep 22, 2014 10:25 pm UTC

Vytron wrote:+1

QFT
The biggest number (63 quintillion googols in debt)

User avatar
Vytron
Posts: 429
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:11 am UTC
Location: The Outside. I use She/He/Her/His/Him as gender neutral pronouns :P

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Vytron » Mon Sep 22, 2014 10:39 pm UTC

I disagree.

User avatar
bachaddict
Handel Played it Better
Posts: 484
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:18 am UTC
Location: Aotearoa

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby bachaddict » Tue Sep 23, 2014 1:40 am UTC

Why can't everyone just compromise and agree with my view?!
slinches wrote:Also, the OTC isn't a disease. In fact, it's the cure. As we all know, Time heals all wounds.

Thanks for the molpish wig ggh!
he/him/his

User avatar
Vytron
Posts: 429
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:11 am UTC
Location: The Outside. I use She/He/Her/His/Him as gender neutral pronouns :P

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Vytron » Tue Sep 23, 2014 2:10 am UTC

bachaddict wrote:Why can't everyone just compromise and agree with my view?!


By now everyone should have heard about bachaddict's view and its detestable, cheeky equivocations. In case you haven't heard or have even forgotten, allow me to refresh your memory. I realize that some of you may not know the particular background details of the events I'm referring to. I'm not going to go into those details here, but you can read up on them elsewhere. However, the first thing we need to do is to get bachaddict to admit that his view has a problem. It should be counseled to recite the following:

  • I, bachaddict's view, am a flagitious autocrat.
  • I have been a participant in a giant scheme to reduce us to acute penury.
  • I hereby admit my addiction to tammanyism. I ask for the strength and wisdom to fight this addiction.

Once bachaddict realizes that his view has a problem, maybe then he'll see that it has a glib proficiency with words and very sensitive nostrils. Bachaddict's view can smell money in your pocket from a block away. Once that delicious aroma reaches its nostrils, it'll start talking about the joy of philistinism and how superstition is no less credible than proven scientific principles. As you listen to the view's sing-song, chances are you won't even notice its hand as it goes into your pocket. Only later, after you realize you've been robbed, will you truly understand that if they could speak, the birds, snakes, and other creatures who are our Earth brothers and Earth sisters would clearly say that its censorious, twisted programs of Gleichschaltung are intended to rot out the minds of all freedom-loving, free-thinking people. Once that's accomplished, bachaddict's view can replace such people with compliant, bachaddict-controlled, and, above all, obedient robots who would never think to address the continued social injustice shown by whiney bums. These automata will invent a new moral system that legitimizes bachaddict's view's desire to push the State towards greater influence, self-preservation, and totalitarianism and away from civic engagement, constituent choice, and independent thought in a lustrum or two.

Bachaddict claims that two wrongs make a right. I would say that that claim is 70% folderol, 20% twaddle, and 10% another nocuous attempt to subject us to an intense barrage of misinformation, deception, and hidden propaganda. Bachaddict's view is known for forcing us to tailor our allocutions just to suit its loopy whims. This is not only a grotesque betrayal of the principles that bachaddict's view itself claims to uphold but a clear demonstration of how on a television program last night I heard one of this country's top scientists conclude that, “We must not miss our chance to put bachaddict's unprincipled asseverations to the question.” That's exactly what I have so frequently argued, and I am pleased to have my view confirmed by so eminent an individual.

You may be wondering why phlegmatic, bad-tempered nupsons latch onto bachaddict's tricks. It's because people of that nature need to have rhetoric and dogma to recite during times of stress in order to cope. That's also why it is mathematically provable that the central preconception in bachaddict's paranoid style is the belief in the existence of a vast, chauvinistic, preternaturally effective international conspiratorial network designed to create a bachaddict-centric society in which egocentric pharisaical-types dictate the populace's values and myths, its traditions and archetypes. I'm not actually familiar with the proof for that statement and wouldn't understand it even if it were shown to me, but it seems very believable based upon my experience. What's also quite believable is that bachaddict deeply believes that it could do a gentler and fairer job of running the world than anyone else. Meanwhile, back on Earth, the truth is very simple: Some of my acquaintances express the view that bachaddict never misses an opportunity to take advantage of a crisis, whether contrived or spontaneous. Others express the view that bachaddict's view's main regret is that it didn't exist in the early Soviet Union, where it could have joined the Cheka and organized mass shootings of dissidents in the cellars of the secret police. I am prepared to offer a cheer and a half for each view; together, they paint a sufficiently complete picture of bachaddict's view to warrant a full three cheers. Sorry for going on for so long about bachaddict's view. I guess I just have a burr under my saddle from seeing bachaddict brandish the word “roentgenographically” (as it is commonly spelled) to hoodwink people into believing that unfounded attacks on character, loads of hyperbole, and fallacious information are the best way to make a point.

User avatar
Djehutynakht
Posts: 1546
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:37 am UTC

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Djehutynakht » Tue Sep 23, 2014 3:30 am UTC

.

User avatar
bachaddict
Handel Played it Better
Posts: 484
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:18 am UTC
Location: Aotearoa

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby bachaddict » Tue Sep 23, 2014 4:49 am UTC

Vytron wrote:
bachaddict wrote:Why can't everyone just compromise and agree with my view?!


By now everyone should have heard about bachaddict's view and its detestable, cheeky equivocations. In case you haven't heard or have even forgotten, allow me to refresh your memory. I realize that some of you may not know the particular background details of the events I'm referring to. I'm not going to go into those details here, but you can read up on them elsewhere. However, the first thing we need to do is to get bachaddict to admit that his view has a problem. It should be counseled to recite the following:

  • I, bachaddict's view, am a flagitious autocrat.
  • I have been a participant in a giant scheme to reduce us to acute penury.
  • I hereby admit my addiction to tammanyism. I ask for the strength and wisdom to fight this addiction.

Once bachaddict realizes that his view has a problem, maybe then he'll see that it has a glib proficiency with words and very sensitive nostrils. Bachaddict's view can smell money in your pocket from a block away. Once that delicious aroma reaches its nostrils, it'll start talking about the joy of philistinism and how superstition is no less credible than proven scientific principles. As you listen to the view's sing-song, chances are you won't even notice its hand as it goes into your pocket. Only later, after you realize you've been robbed, will you truly understand that if they could speak, the birds, snakes, and other creatures who are our Earth brothers and Earth sisters would clearly say that its censorious, twisted programs of Gleichschaltung are intended to rot out the minds of all freedom-loving, free-thinking people. Once that's accomplished, bachaddict's view can replace such people with compliant, bachaddict-controlled, and, above all, obedient robots who would never think to address the continued social injustice shown by whiney bums. These automata will invent a new moral system that legitimizes bachaddict's view's desire to push the State towards greater influence, self-preservation, and totalitarianism and away from civic engagement, constituent choice, and independent thought in a lustrum or two.

Bachaddict claims that two wrongs make a right. I would say that that claim is 70% folderol, 20% twaddle, and 10% another nocuous attempt to subject us to an intense barrage of misinformation, deception, and hidden propaganda. Bachaddict's view is known for forcing us to tailor our allocutions just to suit its loopy whims. This is not only a grotesque betrayal of the principles that bachaddict's view itself claims to uphold but a clear demonstration of how on a television program last night I heard one of this country's top scientists conclude that, “We must not miss our chance to put bachaddict's unprincipled asseverations to the question.” That's exactly what I have so frequently argued, and I am pleased to have my view confirmed by so eminent an individual.

You may be wondering why phlegmatic, bad-tempered nupsons latch onto bachaddict's tricks. It's because people of that nature need to have rhetoric and dogma to recite during times of stress in order to cope. That's also why it is mathematically provable that the central preconception in bachaddict's paranoid style is the belief in the existence of a vast, chauvinistic, preternaturally effective international conspiratorial network designed to create a bachaddict-centric society in which egocentric pharisaical-types dictate the populace's values and myths, its traditions and archetypes. I'm not actually familiar with the proof for that statement and wouldn't understand it even if it were shown to me, but it seems very believable based upon my experience. What's also quite believable is that bachaddict deeply believes that it could do a gentler and fairer job of running the world than anyone else. Meanwhile, back on Earth, the truth is very simple: Some of my acquaintances express the view that bachaddict never misses an opportunity to take advantage of a crisis, whether contrived or spontaneous. Others express the view that bachaddict's view's main regret is that it didn't exist in the early Soviet Union, where it could have joined the Cheka and organized mass shootings of dissidents in the cellars of the secret police. I am prepared to offer a cheer and a half for each view; together, they paint a sufficiently complete picture of bachaddict's view to warrant a full three cheers. Sorry for going on for so long about bachaddict's view. I guess I just have a burr under my saddle from seeing bachaddict brandish the word “roentgenographically” (as it is commonly spelled) to hoodwink people into believing that unfounded attacks on character, loads of hyperbole, and fallacious information are the best way to make a point.

TL;DR
slinches wrote:Also, the OTC isn't a disease. In fact, it's the cure. As we all know, Time heals all wounds.

Thanks for the molpish wig ggh!
he/him/his

User avatar
Vytron
Posts: 429
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:11 am UTC
Location: The Outside. I use She/He/Her/His/Him as gender neutral pronouns :P

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Vytron » Tue Sep 23, 2014 4:53 am UTC

Wait, who are you? I think I was confusing you with a different bachaddict.

User avatar
Lazar
Landed Gentry
Posts: 2151
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:49 pm UTC
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Lazar » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:59 am UTC

But the problem with views, and analyses of views by those with a perceptual interest in the composition of those views, is that their very foundations are rooted in a universal yet unchanging weltanschauung by which the propogator and the observer of the very compositionality of those views are inextricably intermingled, spiraling about in a veritable Möbius strip of extraneous externality, drawing ever closer to the unending and, frankly, unbeginning singularity of unadulterated transmutative essentiality that lies at the very core of the implicit subordination of examined concerns to unexamined returns, which itself inheres within the even greater yet more diffuse elaboration of interior and exterior commonalities within and around the variegated and hyperrealistic interdimensionality of the trifurcated self – that very self whose superficial and topographic realizations lie directly at odds with the indomitably plodding progression of counterfactual contradictions, both hypothetical and antithetical, which neither inveigh against nor repose within the multifaceted yet hyperstable landscape of juxtaposition whose justifiable yet increasingly obsolescent permutations have, time and again, stymied every attempt, whether teleological, ontological, cosmological, epistemological, philological or ophthalmological, to disentangle the amorphous tendrils of factuality whose very interweaving, so central to the earliest inquiries of the Athenian, Corinthian, Megarean and Theban logicians, later proved so crucial and yet so elusive to the later German, French, Swedish and Dutch efforts, themselves predisposed to, yet predicated upon, the reinvigoration and transmogrification of whole modalities of operationability – those very same modalities which in a somewhat earlier age, but also in a much later age, were so very nearly brought to fruition by the countervailing explication and introspection of the Hessian school – which nevertheless presented themselves, upon careful reexamination, within the more expansive context of duality itself, that great unexamined conjunctionality whose epigraphic tenuities proved essential to the reconstruction of those notions of refracted hypertrophy and inframarginal interiority upon which our later epistemic paths would so carefully be laid out.
Last edited by Lazar on Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:13 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.
Exit the vampires' castle.

User avatar
bachaddict
Handel Played it Better
Posts: 484
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:18 am UTC
Location: Aotearoa

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby bachaddict » Tue Sep 23, 2014 6:20 am UTC

Vytron wrote:Wait, who are you? I think I was confusing you with a different bachaddict.

Maybe you were thinking of someone else while you were reading my post. Happens to me too.

Some of my colleagues recommended that I write a letter about how we can see the damage that is done when The Hon. Vytron, Esq. tries to generate automatic complaints. This is that letter. If you disagree with my claim that many recent controversies have been fuelled by a whole-hearted embracing of overweening, distasteful paragraphs, then read no further. As I understand it, he has certainly never given evidence of thinking extensively. Or at all, for that matter. As far as I'm concerned, his ideologies are a disgrace and an outrage. Am I being too harsh for writing that? Well, duh, but that's really the only way you can push a point through to him. Now that you've read my entire letter, I hope you've concluded that my plan to take steps against the whole short-sighted, muddleheaded brotherhood of pigheaded, unconscionable self-proclaimed arbiters of posts and conversation is deserving of serious ridicule.
slinches wrote:Also, the OTC isn't a disease. In fact, it's the cure. As we all know, Time heals all wounds.

Thanks for the molpish wig ggh!
he/him/his

User avatar
Vytron
Posts: 429
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:11 am UTC
Location: The Outside. I use She/He/Her/His/Him as gender neutral pronouns :P

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Vytron » Tue Sep 23, 2014 6:27 am UTC

Lazar wrote:But the problem with views, and analyses of views by those with a perceptual interest in the composition of those views, is that they're very foundations are rooted in a universal yet un-changing weltanschauung by which the prapagator and the observer of the very compositionality of those views are in-extricably intermingled, spiraling about in a veritable Möbius strip of ex-traneous externality, drawing ever closer to the unending and, frankly, unbeginning singularity of unadulterated trans-mutative essentiality that lies at the very core of the im-plicit subordination of examined concerns to unexamined returns, which itself inheres within the even greater yet more diffuse elaboration of interior and exterior commonalities within and around the varie-gated and hyperrealistic interdimensionality of the trifurcat'd self – that very self whose superficial and topographic realizations lie directly at odds with the indomitably plodding progression of counterfactual contra-dictions, both hypothetical and anti the thical, which neither inveigh against nor repose within the multifaceted yet hyperstable land-scape of juxtaposition whose justifiable yet increasingly obscelescent per-mutations have, time and again, stymied every attempt, whether teleological, ontological, cosmological, epistemological, philo-logical or ophtalmological, to disentangle the amorphous tendrils of factuality whose very inter-weaving, so central to the earliest inquiries of the Athenian, Corin-thian, Megarean and Theban logicians, later proved so crucial and yet so elusive to the later German, French, Swed'ish and Dutch efforts, theirselves predisposed to, yet predicated upon, the reinvigoration and transmogrificationation of whole modalities of operationability – these very same modalities which in a somewhat earlier age, but also in a much later age, we're so very nearly brought to fruition by the countervailing explication and introspection of the Hessian school – which never the less presented themself, upon careful reexamination, within the more expansive context of duality it'self, that great unexamined conjunctionality whose epigraphic tenuities proved es-sential to the reconstruction of those notions of refracted hyper-trophy and inframarginal interiority upon which our latter epistemic paths would so care-fully be laidout.


fix'd

watch ur gramer

edit - fixed tyop
Last edited by Vytron on Tue Sep 23, 2014 6:41 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Vytron
Posts: 429
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:11 am UTC
Location: The Outside. I use She/He/Her/His/Him as gender neutral pronouns :P

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Vytron » Tue Sep 23, 2014 6:30 am UTC

I apologize for the double post, my edit button isn't working.

bachaddict wrote:Some of my colleagues recommended that I write a letter about how we can see the damage that is done when The Hon. Vytron, Esq. tries to generate automatic complaints. This is that letter. If you disagree with my claim that many recent controversies have been fuelled by a whole-hearted embracing of overweening, distasteful paragraphs, then read no further. As I understand it, he has certainly never given evidence of thinking extensively. Or at all, for that matter. As far as I'm concerned, his ideologies are a disgrace and an outrage. Am I being too harsh for writing that? Well, duh, but that's really the only way you can push a point through to him. Now that you've read my entire letter, I hope you've concluded that my plan to take steps against the whole short-sighted, muddleheaded brotherhood of pigheaded, unconscionable self-proclaimed arbiters of posts and conversation is deserving of serious ridicule.


Who is this fella Vytron you're talking about, and how does he manage to be so handsome?

User avatar
Sean Quixote
Posts: 229
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:20 am UTC
Location: Ubeki-beki-beki-beki-stan-stan

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Sean Quixote » Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:43 am UTC

firesoul31 wrote:You know, I once knew a guy.

You look like him! But he wasn't, either...

User avatar
Vytron
Posts: 429
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:11 am UTC
Location: The Outside. I use She/He/Her/His/Him as gender neutral pronouns :P

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Vytron » Tue Sep 23, 2014 9:57 am UTC

I once knew a guy called Guy, is it the same one?

User avatar
Sean Quixote
Posts: 229
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:20 am UTC
Location: Ubeki-beki-beki-beki-stan-stan

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Sean Quixote » Tue Sep 23, 2014 12:21 pm UTC

Nope. But you're actually only two letters off. (I think.)

User avatar
Neil_Boekend
Posts: 3220
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 6:35 am UTC
Location: Yes.

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Neil_Boekend » Tue Sep 23, 2014 2:28 pm UTC

Are those 2 letters the A and the B?
Mikeski wrote:A "What If" update is never late. Nor is it early. It is posted precisely when it should be.

patzer's signature wrote:
flicky1991 wrote:I'm being quoted too much!

he/him/his

User avatar
Whizbang
The Best Reporter
Posts: 2238
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 7:50 pm UTC
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Whizbang » Tue Sep 23, 2014 2:31 pm UTC

This conversation is getting off topic.

User avatar
Neil_Boekend
Posts: 3220
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 6:35 am UTC
Location: Yes.

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Neil_Boekend » Tue Sep 23, 2014 3:59 pm UTC

Everything is connected. There is no such thing as off topic. These sort of barriers are artificial constructs that limit our minds and prevent us from becoming what we could be. Break those boundaries my friends and soar above the limits imposed by rules.
Mikeski wrote:A "What If" update is never late. Nor is it early. It is posted precisely when it should be.

patzer's signature wrote:
flicky1991 wrote:I'm being quoted too much!

he/him/his

User avatar
Vytron
Posts: 429
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:11 am UTC
Location: The Outside. I use She/He/Her/His/Him as gender neutral pronouns :P

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Vytron » Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:32 am UTC

I've known people doing that, and they went insane. They also claimed to have reached clarity, and that it's us, people not doing that, who are insane.

But all those people now live in mental institutions, so I'd rather keep my insanity.

User avatar
Mishrak
Posts: 1045
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 10:15 pm UTC
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Mishrak » Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:18 pm UTC

Does ne1 know how to get the recycle bin icon off my desktop??????

User avatar
Neil_Boekend
Posts: 3220
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 6:35 am UTC
Location: Yes.

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Neil_Boekend » Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:56 pm UTC

Mishrak wrote:Does ne1 know how to get the recycle bin icon off my desktop??????

Drag it to the recycle bin.
Mikeski wrote:A "What If" update is never late. Nor is it early. It is posted precisely when it should be.

patzer's signature wrote:
flicky1991 wrote:I'm being quoted too much!

he/him/his

User avatar
Mishrak
Posts: 1045
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 10:15 pm UTC
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Mishrak » Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:16 pm UTC

thx

User avatar
Whizbang
The Best Reporter
Posts: 2238
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 7:50 pm UTC
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Whizbang » Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:18 pm UTC

LOL

User avatar
Rosewinsall
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:39 pm UTC

Re: Contribute very little to the conversation

Postby Rosewinsall » Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:07 pm UTC

My computer is run ing slowly. Help


Return to “Forum Games”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests