Page 1 of 2

Quantum Nomic

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 6:34 pm UTC
by liberonscien
The post at the top of each page must contain a new rule proposal.
Players may obey the rule if they want.
If they are following the rule then they must have "For" in the subject in their post.
If they are not then they must have "Against".
If there are more For's than Against's then the rule is added and the player that proposed it earns five points.
If there are more Against's than For's then the rule is not added and the player loses five points.
Players may post to the thread multiple times in a page.
Any rule regarding points may be proposed or created.
Consequences for failing to follow any of these rules may be proposed or created.
Proposals must be in bold.
Players start the game with ten points.
New stats may be created or destroyed.

Emoticons are forbidden.

For

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 6:39 pm UTC
by liberonscien
If anyone has any questions, feel free to ask.

Against

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 6:41 pm UTC
by Pied typer
I like emoticons :(

For

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:01 pm UTC
by liberonscien
Pied typer wrote:I like emoticons snip

I don't dislike them. I just need a minor controversy.

Against

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:06 pm UTC
by Pied typer
liberonscien wrote:
Pied typer wrote:I like emoticons :(

I don't dislike them. I just need a minor controversy.

That's not a "for" post because you didn't censor my emoticon, so it technically breaks the rule.

Can I propose multiple rules per topper?

Against

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:48 pm UTC
by somitomi
Pied typer wrote:That's not a "for" post because you didn't censor my emoticon, so it technically breaks the rule.

Can I propose multiple rules per topper?

The rule is not effective yet, since the vote about it isn't over.

Against

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:53 pm UTC
by Pied typer
somitomi wrote:
Pied typer wrote:That's not a "for" post because you didn't censor my emoticon, so it technically breaks the rule.

Can I propose multiple rules per topper?

The rule is not effective yet, since the vote about it isn't over.

I was under the impression that a post that follows the rule is a "for" post, and a post that breaks it is an "against" post.

Speaking of which: :mrgreen:

For

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 8:37 pm UTC
by liberonscien
Pied typer wrote:
somitomi wrote:
Pied typer wrote:That's not a "for" post because you didn't censor my emoticon, so it technically breaks the rule.

Can I propose multiple rules per topper?

The rule is not effective yet, since the vote about it isn't over.

I was under the impression that a post that follows the rule is a "for" post, and a post that breaks it is an "against" post.

Speaking of which: Snip

Touché.

Anyways, one proposal at a time.

Against

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 8:51 pm UTC
by Pied typer
:mrgreen:

For

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 8:58 pm UTC
by liberonscien
Pied typer wrote:snip

That will be banned if I have my way.

Against

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:01 pm UTC
by Pied typer
liberonscien wrote:
Pied typer wrote:snip

That will be banned if I have my way.

I count 6 against to 4 for.

:mrgreen:

Re: Against

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:05 pm UTC
by liberonscien
Pied typer wrote:
liberonscien wrote:
Pied typer wrote:snip

That will be banned if I have my way.

I count 6 against to 4 for.

snip

Well, then I need to do something different.

Against

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:07 pm UTC
by Pied typer
You do. :mrgreen:

Re: Against

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:09 pm UTC
by liberonscien
Pied typer wrote:You do. snip

Stop that.

Against

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:10 pm UTC
by Pied typer
Why? 8-)

Re: Against

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:14 pm UTC
by liberonscien
Pied typer wrote:Why? snip

If you support this one, I'll support your next one, provided it isn't too unreasonable.

Re: Against

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:17 pm UTC
by Pied typer
liberonscien wrote:
Pied typer wrote:Why? 8-)

If you support this one, I'll support your next one, provided it isn't too unreasonable.

Are you saying that you won't otherwise?

For

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:23 pm UTC
by liberonscien
Pied typer wrote:
liberonscien wrote:
Pied typer wrote:Why? snip

If you support this one, I'll support your next one, provided it isn't too unreasonable.

Are you saying that you won't otherwise?

No. I'll be more accepting of a silly rule if you are more accepting of this one. I won't accept a rule that kills the game.

I'm trying to bribe you.

Against

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:37 pm UTC
by Pied typer
liberonscien wrote:
Pied typer wrote:
liberonscien wrote:
Pied typer wrote:Why? 8-)

If you support this one, I'll support your next one, provided it isn't too unreasonable.

Are you saying that you won't otherwise?

No. I'll be more accepting of a silly rule if you are more accepting of this one. I won't accept a rule that kills the game.

I'm trying to bribe you.

Actually, I wasn't planning on doing another "silly" rule. My plan was to target a loophole in the rules that you left out.

And anyway, I still really like the smilies.

For

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:42 pm UTC
by liberonscien
Pied typer wrote:
liberonscien wrote:
Pied typer wrote:
liberonscien wrote:
Pied typer wrote:Why? snip

If you support this one, I'll support your next one, provided it isn't too unreasonable.

Are you saying that you won't otherwise?

No. I'll be more accepting of a silly rule if you are more accepting of this one. I won't accept a rule that kills the game.

I'm trying to bribe you.

Actually, I wasn't planning on doing another "silly" rule. My plan was to target a loophole in the rules that you left out.

And anyway, I still really like the smilies.

Alright.
What loophole?
I have nothing against them. I just wanted something inconsequential to have to start the game.

Against

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:44 pm UTC
by Pied typer
liberonscien wrote:
Pied typer wrote:
liberonscien wrote:
Pied typer wrote:
liberonscien wrote:
Pied typer wrote:Why? 8-)

If you support this one, I'll support your next one, provided it isn't too unreasonable.

Are you saying that you won't otherwise?

No. I'll be more accepting of a silly rule if you are more accepting of this one. I won't accept a rule that kills the game.

I'm trying to bribe you.

Actually, I wasn't planning on doing another "silly" rule. My plan was to target a loophole in the rules that you left out.

And anyway, I still really like the smilies.

Alright.
What loophole?
I have nothing against them. I just wanted something inconsequential to have to start the game.

Not telling.

Re: Against

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:50 pm UTC
by liberonscien
Pied typer wrote:Not telling.

Why not?
You think I'll immediately patch it?

Against

Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 8:29 pm UTC
by The Snide Sniper
What if you don't get the page topper :?:

For

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2017 3:23 am UTC
by liberonscien
The Snide Sniper wrote:What if you don't get the page topper?

No stated consequence for a reason. If you don't propose a rule for the topper then no new rule is proposed for a dozen posts. Built in penalty for not paying attention to things.

Against

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2017 12:16 am UTC
by Pied typer
Fair enough I guess. So the rule patch I was proposing was to forbid double posting :!:

For

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2017 4:34 pm UTC
by liberonscien
Pied typer wrote:Fair enough I guess. So the rule patch I was proposing was to forbid double posting :!:

Oh, that's a good idea. Someone should propose that later.

Against

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2017 6:02 pm UTC
by The Snide Sniper
:mrgreen: Like

Against

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2017 6:02 pm UTC
by The Snide Sniper
this? :mrgreen:

For

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2017 6:46 pm UTC
by liberonscien
The Snide Sniper wrote:this?
The Snide Sniper wrote:Like

Yes.

Re: Quantum Nomic

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2017 8:14 pm UTC
by The Snide Sniper
Let's play Smiley Chess. Lib, you're white (the bottom).

:) :wink: :arrow: :twisted: 8-) :arrow: :wink: :)
:?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?:
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
:!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :!:
:D :| :idea: :evil: :P :idea: :| :D

Against

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2017 10:20 pm UTC
by liberonscien
The Snide Sniper wrote:Let's play Smiley Chess. Lib, you're white (the bottom).

snip

No.
Very amusing though.

Against

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 1:10 pm UTC
by username5243
The Snide Sniper wrote:Let's play Smiley Chess. Lib, you're white (the bottom).

:) :wink: :arrow: :twisted: 8-) :arrow: :wink: :)
:?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?:
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
:!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :!:
:D :| :idea: :evil: :P :idea: :| :D

I want to join... :cry:

But I'm not good at chess anyway, so it doesn't matter.

Re: Against

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 3:30 pm UTC
by The Snide Sniper
username5243 wrote:
The Snide Sniper wrote:Let's play Smiley Chess. Lib, you're white (the bottom).

:) :wink: :arrow: :twisted: 8-) :arrow: :wink: :)
:?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?:
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
:!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :!:
:D :| :idea: :evil: :P :idea: :| :D

I want to join... :cry:

But I'm not good at chess anyway, so it doesn't matter.

Lib has declined, so I guess you can play.

For

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 8:37 pm UTC
by liberonscien
The Snide Sniper wrote:
username5243 wrote:
The Snide Sniper wrote:Let's play Smiley Chess. Lib, you're white (the bottom).

snip

I want to join... snip

But I'm not good at chess anyway, so it doesn't matter.

Lib has declined, so I guess you can play.

Stop this spam.

Against

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2017 11:16 pm UTC
by The Snide Sniper
liberonscien wrote:
The Snide Sniper wrote:
username5243 wrote:
The Snide Sniper wrote:Let's play Smiley Chess. Lib, you're white (the bottom).

snip

I want to join... snip

But I'm not good at chess anyway, so it doesn't matter.

Lib has declined, so I guess you can play.

Stop this spam.

:( I guess I could start a thread for it though…

For

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2017 3:28 am UTC
by liberonscien
The Snide Sniper wrote:
liberonscien wrote:
The Snide Sniper wrote:
username5243 wrote:
The Snide Sniper wrote:Let's play Smiley Chess. Lib, you're white (the bottom).

snip

I want to join... snip

But I'm not good at chess anyway, so it doesn't matter.

Lib has declined, so I guess you can play.

Stop this spam.

Aw. I guess I could start a thread for it though…

I'm referring to the emoticons.

Against

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2017 11:28 pm UTC
by Pied typer
liberonscien wrote:
The Snide Sniper wrote:
liberonscien wrote:
The Snide Sniper wrote:
username5243 wrote:
The Snide Sniper wrote:Let's play Smiley Chess. Lib, you're white (the bottom).

snip

I want to join... snip

But I'm not good at chess anyway, so it doesn't matter.

Lib has declined, so I guess you can play.

Stop this spam.

Aw. I guess I could start a thread for it though…

I'm referring to the emoticons.

No. Welcome to politics.
The Snide Sniper wrote: :) :wink: :arrow: :twisted: 8-) :arrow: :wink: :)
:?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?:
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
:!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :!:
:D :| :idea: :evil: :P :idea: :| :D

For

Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 12:53 am UTC
by liberonscien
Pied typer wrote:
liberonscien wrote:
The Snide Sniper wrote:
liberonscien wrote:
The Snide Sniper wrote:
username5243 wrote:
The Snide Sniper wrote:Let's play Smiley Chess. Lib, you're white (the bottom).

snip

I want to join... snip

But I'm not good at chess anyway, so it doesn't matter.

Lib has declined, so I guess you can play.

Stop this spam.

Aw. I guess I could start a thread for it though…

I'm referring to the emoticons.

No. Welcome to politics.
The Snide Sniper wrote:snip

Well, my proposal looks like it is going to fail.

Re: For

Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 4:56 pm UTC
by The Snide Sniper
liberonscien wrote:
Pied typer wrote:
liberonscien wrote:
The Snide Sniper wrote:
liberonscien wrote:
The Snide Sniper wrote:
username5243 wrote:
The Snide Sniper wrote:Let's play Smiley Chess. Lib, you're white (the bottom).

snip

I want to join... snip

But I'm not good at chess anyway, so it doesn't matter.

Lib has declined, so I guess you can play.

Stop this spam.

Aw. I guess I could start a thread for it though…

I'm referring to the emoticons.

No. Welcome to politics.
The Snide Sniper wrote:snip

Well, my proposal looks like it is going to fail.

It will. :lol:

For

Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 5:17 pm UTC
by liberonscien
The Snide Sniper wrote:
liberonscien wrote:
Pied typer wrote:
liberonscien wrote:
The Snide Sniper wrote:
liberonscien wrote:
The Snide Sniper wrote:
username5243 wrote:
The Snide Sniper wrote:Let's play Smiley Chess. Lib, you're white (the bottom).

snip

I want to join... snip

But I'm not good at chess anyway, so it doesn't matter.

Lib has declined, so I guess you can play.

Stop this spam.

Aw. I guess I could start a thread for it though…

I'm referring to the emoticons.

No. Welcome to politics.
The Snide Sniper wrote:snip

Well, my proposal looks like it is going to fail.

It will. snip

Oh well, it wasn't expected to succeed.