## WolframAlpha keeps calculating after it prints an answer

For the discussion of math. Duh.

Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates

BlackSails
Posts: 5315
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 5:48 am UTC

### WolframAlpha keeps calculating after it prints an answer

take the following: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=maximize+x^-x+between+.1+and+4

you can see wolfram alpha give you a first estimate, then correct it as it finds a better answer

raygungothic
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 1:17 pm UTC

### Re: WolframAlpha keeps calculating after it prints an answer

I think it also caches queries in some way, though...

DavCrav
Posts: 251
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 3:04 pm UTC
Location: Oxford, UK

### Re: WolframAlpha keeps calculating after it prints an answer

I've had this happen. It has a go at integration, gives some numerical answer, and then tries to give a nice expression for it afterwards. It's kind of cool.

mr-mitch
Posts: 477
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:56 pm UTC

### Re: WolframAlpha keeps calculating after it prints an answer

How long did it take for you? I've left it for a couple of minutes and I still have the approximate answer

edit: after 20 minutes, still no go.

Ended
Posts: 1459
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 3:27 pm UTC
Location: The Tower of Flints. (Also known as: England.)

### Re: WolframAlpha keeps calculating after it prints an answer

mr-mitch wrote:How long did it take for you? I've left it for a couple of minutes and I still have the approximate answer

For the x^-x one it doesn't give an exact answer, it just refines the approximate answer. It happens very quickly - reload the page and keep an eye on the last couple of digits in the answer for x. For me, they change from 97 to 79.
Generally I try to make myself do things I instinctively avoid, in case they are awesome.
-dubsola

joshz
Posts: 1466
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 2:51 am UTC
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

### Re: WolframAlpha keeps calculating after it prints an answer

It's likely using Newton's method to find a max. It first finds xn and then shows that to you, and then calculates xn+m and shows that to you instead (using n and m cause I have no idea how fast their machine can do this kind of thing.)
You, sir, name? wrote:If you have over 26 levels of nesting, you've got bigger problems ... than variable naming.
suffer-cait wrote:it might also be interesting to note here that i don't like 5 fingers. they feel too bulky.