Favorite math jokes
Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates
 phlip
 Restorer of Worlds
 Posts: 7569
 Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:56 am UTC
 Location: Australia
 Contact:
Re: Favorite math jokes
Either him or Euler... I think his list is even longer than the one for Cauchy... Actually, all of these pages are pretty ridiculous.
I think I'll call it the Last EulerFermat Theorem from now on.
I think I'll call it the Last EulerFermat Theorem from now on.
Code: Select all
enum ಠ_ಠ {°□°╰=1, °Д°╰, ಠ益ಠ╰};
void ┻━┻︵╰(ಠ_ಠ ⚠) {exit((int)⚠);}
 Monika
 Welcoming Aarvark
 Posts: 3672
 Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:03 am UTC
 Location: Germany, near Heidelberg
 Contact:
Re: Favorite math jokes
Kirby wrote:For the final question on an oral exam, a student was asked to find the limit to infinity of the following sequence: I know, I know that you know, I know that you know that I know, I know that you know that I know that you know, ...
Dazzled, all the student could come up with was, "I don't know."
The professor, equally baffled, replied, "Seriously? Come on. It's common knowledge!"
I don't get it.
#xkcdq on irc.foonetic.net  the LGBTIQQA support channel
Please donate to help these people
Please donate to help these people
 phlip
 Restorer of Worlds
 Posts: 7569
 Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:56 am UTC
 Location: Australia
 Contact:
Re: Favorite math jokes
Code: Select all
enum ಠ_ಠ {°□°╰=1, °Д°╰, ಠ益ಠ╰};
void ┻━┻︵╰(ಠ_ಠ ⚠) {exit((int)⚠);}
 TheChewanater
 Posts: 1279
 Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:24 am UTC
 Location: lol why am I still wearing a Santa suit?
Re: Favorite math jokes
phlip wrote:Either him or Euler... I think his list is even longer than the one for Cauchy... Actually, all of these pages are pretty ridiculous.
We should call math "Eularology".
http://internetometer.com/give/4279
No one can agree how to count how many types of people there are. You could ask two people and get 10 different answers.
 Monika
 Welcoming Aarvark
 Posts: 3672
 Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:03 am UTC
 Location: Germany, near Heidelberg
 Contact:
Re: Favorite math jokes
phlip wrote:A hint.
Thanks.
#xkcdq on irc.foonetic.net  the LGBTIQQA support channel
Please donate to help these people
Please donate to help these people
 StickFigure206
 Posts: 12
 Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 7:06 pm UTC
 Location: Ballard, Seattle, Washington
Re: Favorite math jokes
"I'm a stick figure sprinter. Sometimes my legs break, sometimes I slip and fall, but I'm fast I tell ya, darn fast!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4396710
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4396710
Re: Favorite math jokes
i is being such a hypocrite, considering it is not a rational number.

 Posts: 3
 Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 7:25 am UTC
Re: Favorite math jokes
Here's a joke that I've had a few mathemician friends of mine convinced that this is a good joke:
Why did Bourbaki stop publishing?
Because he realised that Serge Lang was one person.
I understand that 'Bourbaki' was the pseudonym used by a group of French mathematicians that published a series of textbooks in the 1930s and 40s, and that Serge Lang was a member of this group. But why is this joke funny? I just don't get it.
Why did Bourbaki stop publishing?
Because he realised that Serge Lang was one person.
I understand that 'Bourbaki' was the pseudonym used by a group of French mathematicians that published a series of textbooks in the 1930s and 40s, and that Serge Lang was a member of this group. But why is this joke funny? I just don't get it.
Re: Favorite math jokes
Serge Lang is known for being an incredibly prolific author of textbooks, despite being only one person. I think the idea of the joke is that the members of Bourbaki were like, "Geez, even though we're a collection of people, we can't compete with that guy Lang!"
Re: Favorite math jokes
Mindworm wrote:I don't see how this begs the question. Fermat's Last Theorem has been proven, and I see no invalid algebraic steps in this proof.
One would need to find out whether the statement he proved is used somewhere in the proof of Fermat's Last Theorem. I'm no expert on this
(or on any math, at this point), but I heard that Wiles used many results of higher math (things that have only been proven recently), and you would have to check every single one of them for this trivial lemma.
I disagree completely. A proof is a proof. If it relied on anything that wasn't already proven, we couldn't call it that. So if this irrationality of roots of 2 is somehow involved in the proof of FLT, it must also be proven there, or at least an existing proof must be cited.
By the same token, once something is proven, we can use it in other proofs without fear. This problem of "begging the question" (I think what Eebster meant was circular reasoning) only happens if we assume things  if we show that A implies B and B implies A, and call that a proof of both. This is different. If you use known fact X in a proof of theorem Y, then use theorem Y to prove X again, you haven't done anything invalid. You've just wasted your time, because X was already proven.
Using FLT to prove roots of 2 are irrational is perfectly sound, whether the FLT proof uses that fact or not. The joke is just that it's the mathematical equivalent of shooting a fly with a cannon.
FiveMinute.net: Because stuff is long and life is short
Re: Favorite math jokes
CZeke wrote:The joke is just that it's the mathematical equivalent of shooting a fly with a cannon.
That sounds like it would still take quite a bit of work.
double epsilon = .0000001;
Re: Favorite math jokes
Let's say a dead fly, then.
FiveMinute.net: Because stuff is long and life is short
 Eebster the Great
 Posts: 3420
 Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:58 am UTC
 Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Re: Favorite math jokes
CZeke wrote:By the same token, once something is proven, we can use it in other proofs without fear. This problem of "begging the question" (I think what Eebster meant was circular reasoning) only happens if we assume things  if we show that A implies B and B implies A, and call that a proof of both. This is different. If you use known fact X in a proof of theorem Y, then use theorem Y to prove X again, you haven't done anything invalid. You've just wasted your time, because X was already proven.
The proof of this begs the question because it assumes a much stronger condition to prove a much weaker one. That doesn't mean it isn't "valid" in the sense that the propositions entail the conclusions, but it certainly isn't a useful way to derive new information, either.
It's similar to the following proof that humans need to eat food:
1. All animals need to eat food.
2. Humans are animals.
3. Therefore humans need to eat food.
Technically 1 and 2 are known to be true and do entail 3, but in order to prove 1 in the first place we would have needed to know many things, including 3.
Re: Favorite math jokes
Eebster the Great wrote:It's similar to the following proof that humans need to eat food:
1. All animals need to eat food.
2. Humans are animals.
3. Therefore humans need to eat food.
Technically 1 and 2 are known to be true and do entail 3, but in order to prove 1 in the first place we would have needed to know many things, including 3.
Unless, of course, we defined animals as entities that need to eat food.
 Monika
 Welcoming Aarvark
 Posts: 3672
 Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:03 am UTC
 Location: Germany, near Heidelberg
 Contact:
Re: Favorite math jokes
There are animals that don't eat, like a fly that mates and dies within one day.
Then it is a dead fly and can be shot with a cannon.
Then it is a dead fly and can be shot with a cannon.
#xkcdq on irc.foonetic.net  the LGBTIQQA support channel
Please donate to help these people
Please donate to help these people
Re: Favorite math jokes
Monika wrote:There are animals that don't eat, like a fly that mates and dies within one day.
Then it is a dead fly and can be shot with a cannon.
[nitpick]
Mayfly's are the shortest lived insect, living from 30 minutes to 1 day. But they still eat. Also they exist in larva for months to a year, they just die shortly after hatching.
Any living organism that does anything must consume something, whether it be food or energy (eg light or heat), conservation of energy and all.
[/nitpick]
addams wrote:This forum has some very well educated people typing away in loops with Sourmilk. He is a lucky Sourmilk.
 Monika
 Welcoming Aarvark
 Posts: 3672
 Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:03 am UTC
 Location: Germany, near Heidelberg
 Contact:
Re: Favorite math jokes
Maybe it wasn't the flies then, but there was some kind of insect or worm that doesn't eat his whole (short) life time. I think it only applied to the males.
#xkcdq on irc.foonetic.net  the LGBTIQQA support channel
Please donate to help these people
Please donate to help these people
 Eebster the Great
 Posts: 3420
 Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:58 am UTC
 Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Re: Favorite math jokes
Monika wrote:Maybe it wasn't the flies then, but there was some kind of insect or worm that doesn't eat his whole (short) life time. I think it only applied to the males.
Well obviously it couldn't apply to both genders at all stages of life. :O
But no, I don't think there is anything like what you are imagining. There are, however, some adult insects that do not eat. (Also a great many adult plants.)
Re: Favorite math jokes
Mike_Bson wrote:i is being such a hypocrite, considering it is not a rational number.
True, though both its real and imaginary parts are rational, so maybe it likes rational numbers better than irrational ones.
 Eebster the Great
 Posts: 3420
 Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:58 am UTC
 Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Re: Favorite math jokes
pizzazz wrote:Mike_Bson wrote:i is being such a hypocrite, considering it is not a rational number.
True, though both its real and imaginary parts are rational.
But its argument is transcendental.
Re: Favorite math jokes
Eebster the Great wrote:pizzazz wrote:Mike_Bson wrote:i is being such a hypocrite, considering it is not a rational number.
True, though both its real and imaginary parts are rational.
But its argument is transcendental.
So is 1's
addams wrote:This forum has some very well educated people typing away in loops with Sourmilk. He is a lucky Sourmilk.
Re: Favorite math jokes
Recent conversation lead me to this
"I'm sure you'll change your mind once you have a look at my degrees."
"I'm sure you'll change your mind once you have a look at my degrees."
Re: Favorite math jokes
Eebster the Great wrote:The proof of this begs the question 
Stop right there. We agree on everything except your use of this term. Begging the question is the specific logical fallacy of assuming at some point what you're trying to prove. If something's already proven and you're just using it, there's no assumption, so you can't be begging the question.
FiveMinute.net: Because stuff is long and life is short
 phlip
 Restorer of Worlds
 Posts: 7569
 Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:56 am UTC
 Location: Australia
 Contact:
Re: Favorite math jokes
Right... if you use A to prove B, then use B to prove C, then use C to prove B again, then everything's still valid. Redundant, sure (and indeed that's the joke), but not fallacious.
Code: Select all
enum ಠ_ಠ {°□°╰=1, °Д°╰, ಠ益ಠ╰};
void ┻━┻︵╰(ಠ_ಠ ⚠) {exit((int)⚠);}
 Eebster the Great
 Posts: 3420
 Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:58 am UTC
 Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Re: Favorite math jokes
CZeke wrote:Stop right there. We agree on everything except your use of this term. Begging the question is the specific logical fallacy of assuming at some point what you're trying to prove. If something's already proven and you're just using it, there's no assumption, so you can't be begging the question.
This phrase seems to stir more controversy than I care to deal with right now. Suffice it to say that many terms for logical and rhetorical fallacies are frequently used in a less formal sense (cf. "slippery slope"), as they nearly always crop up in informal logic. Whether or not this usage is "correct" is perhaps a different issue.

 Posts: 6
 Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 11:18 pm UTC
Re: Favorite math jokes
A woman in a bar tries to pick up a mathematician.
"How old, do you think, am I?" she asks coyly.
"Well  18 by that fire in your eyes, 19 by that glow on your cheeks, 20 by that radiance of your face, and adding that up is something you can probably do for yourself..."
"How old, do you think, am I?" she asks coyly.
"Well  18 by that fire in your eyes, 19 by that glow on your cheeks, 20 by that radiance of your face, and adding that up is something you can probably do for yourself..."
Re: Favorite math jokes
What's the difference between a mathematician and a philosopher?
Spoiler:
You, sir, name? wrote:If you have over 26 levels of nesting, you've got bigger problems ... than variable naming.
suffercait wrote:it might also be interesting to note here that i don't like 5 fingers. they feel too bulky.
 Eebster the Great
 Posts: 3420
 Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:58 am UTC
 Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Re: Favorite math jokes
Qaanol wrote:Normal people smoke pot on the way to work.
I don't get it.
 phlip
 Restorer of Worlds
 Posts: 7569
 Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:56 am UTC
 Location: Australia
 Contact:
Re: Favorite math jokes
No, you see, it's a pun... in that if you take the bell curve, and turn it upsidedown, it looks kinda like a cooking pot, and then there's another pun on "work", meaning force times distance, which makes it all...
Yeah, I got no idea either.
Yeah, I got no idea either.
Code: Select all
enum ಠ_ಠ {°□°╰=1, °Д°╰, ಠ益ಠ╰};
void ┻━┻︵╰(ಠ_ಠ ⚠) {exit((int)⚠);}
 Talith
 Proved the Goldbach Conjecture
 Posts: 848
 Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 1:28 am UTC
 Location: Manchester  UK
Re: Favorite math jokes
I'm guessing it's a reference to some notable mathematicians (and other scientists) doing their best work while high. So they smoke weed while working (not sure how many people actually smoke on the way to work.... maybe that's an american thing)
 Eebster the Great
 Posts: 3420
 Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:58 am UTC
 Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Re: Favorite math jokes
Qaanol wrote:Commute with a joint.
Wait, I still don't get it. Is a "joint" like a "join"?
E: For normal subgroups A and B, A∨B = B∨A, where ∨ represents the join of the lattice of normal subgroups, so I guess that makes sense.
Re: Favorite math jokes
Wikipedia wrote:Representations
According to the standard mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics, quantum observables such as x and p should be represented as selfadjoint operators on some Hilbert space. It is relatively easy to see that two operators satisfying the canonical commutation relations cannot both be bounded. The canonical commutation relations can be made tamer by writing them in terms of the (bounded) unitary operators e^{−ikx} and e^{−iap}, which admit finitedimensional representations as well. The resulting braiding relations for these are the socalled Weyl relations. The uniqueness of the canonical commutation relations between position and momentum is guaranteed by the Stonevon Neumann theorem. The group associated with these commutation relations is called the Heisenberg group.
Re: Favorite math jokes
This might be to geeky even for this forum, but I came up with a while ago and have had a hard time finding a nerdy enough crowd so I figured I'd try here. =)
A frequentist and a bayesanist walk into a bar. A girl is smiling at the bayesanist as they order drinks. The frequentist says:
"Go flirt with her, you can easily score her."
The bayesanist then walks up to her and talks for a bit, but she turns him down and leaves. Walking back to the frequentist he has a big smile on his face, and the frequentist asks him why he would look so happy, when his flirtation appearently didn't end well. The bayesanist answers:
"According to my calculations, we're making out right now!"
A frequentist and a bayesanist walk into a bar. A girl is smiling at the bayesanist as they order drinks. The frequentist says:
"Go flirt with her, you can easily score her."
The bayesanist then walks up to her and talks for a bit, but she turns him down and leaves. Walking back to the frequentist he has a big smile on his face, and the frequentist asks him why he would look so happy, when his flirtation appearently didn't end well. The bayesanist answers:
"According to my calculations, we're making out right now!"
Re: Favorite math jokes
I was thinking of showing that to some Bayesian friends/coworkers to see if it's funny to them, but I'm having trouble coming up with a suitable prior.
pollywog wrote:I want to learn this smile, perfect it, and then go around smiling at lesbians and freaking them out.Wikihow wrote:* Smile a lot! Give a gay girl a knowing "Hey, I'm a lesbian too!" smile.
Re: Favorite math jokes
mahannes wrote:This might be to geeky even for this forum, but I came up with a while ago and have had a hard time finding a nerdy enough crowd so I figured I'd try here. =)
A frequentist and a bayesanist walk into a bar. A girl is smiling at the bayesanist as they order drinks. The frequentist says:
"Go flirt with her, you can easily score her."
The bayesanist then walks up to her and talks for a bit, but she turns him down and leaves. Walking back to the frequentist he has a big smile on his face, and the frequentist asks him why he would look so happy, when his flirtation appearently didn't end well. The bayesanist answers:
"According to my calculations, we're making out right now!"
Sounds like the cheeky bastard used a point mass prior.
(It does tend to make the calculations easier...)
double epsilon = .0000001;
 NathanielJ
 Posts: 882
 Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:04 pm UTC
Re: Favorite math jokes
Eebster the Great wrote:Qaanol wrote:Commute with a joint.
Wait, I still don't get it. Is a "joint" like a "join"?
Presumably it's "a joint" like "adjoint". A normal operator is one that commutes with its adjoint. Hence, the joke. You may now slap your knee.
 Eebster the Great
 Posts: 3420
 Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:58 am UTC
 Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Re: Favorite math jokes
NathanielJ wrote:Eebster the Great wrote:Qaanol wrote:Commute with a joint.
Wait, I still don't get it. Is a "joint" like a "join"?
Presumably it's "a joint" like "adjoint". A normal operator is one that commutes with its adjoint. Hence, the joke. You may now slap your knee.
Ah, I see.
"Why does your typical telephone worker toke on the way to work?"
"Because normal operators commute with adjoint!"
Re: Favorite math jokes
Dunno if someone already posted this:
"Death solves all problems  no man, no problem."
"We are each our own devil, and we make this world our hell."
"We are each our own devil, and we make this world our hell."
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests