## slightly excessive numbers

For the discussion of math. Duh.

Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates

nash1429
Posts: 190
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 3:06 am UTC
Location: Flatland
Contact:

### slightly excessive numbers

I have read that although there are slightly defective numbers (divisors add up to one less that the number, counting each divsor only once, e.g. 4: 1+2=3), there do not appear to be any slightly excessive numbers even though their existence has not been proven or disproven. Why don't prime numbers count (such as 7*1=7 and 7+1=8)?

snowyowl
Posts: 464
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:36 pm UTC

### Re: slightly excessive numbers

Because you don't count the number itself. The sum of the divisors of a prime number is 1, purely and simply.
The preceding comment is an automated response.

Anubis
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:59 am UTC

### Re: slightly excessive numbers

Yeah, if you counted the number itself, every number would work.

kernelpanic
Posts: 891
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2008 1:26 am UTC
Location: 1.6180339x10^18 attoparsecs from Earth

### Re: slightly excessive numbers

Anubis wrote:Yeah, if you counted the number itself, every number would work.

Except 1. And 0.
I'm not disorganized. My room has a high entropy.
Bhelliom wrote:Don't forget that the cat probably knows EXACTLY what it is doing is is most likely just screwing with you. You know, for CAT SCIENCE!

Token
Posts: 1481
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 5:07 pm UTC
Location: London

### Re: slightly excessive numbers

kernelpanic wrote:
Anubis wrote:Yeah, if you counted the number itself, every number would work.

Except 1. And 0.

And every other non-prime number.
All posts are works in progress. If I posted something within the last hour, chances are I'm still editing it.

mdyrud
Posts: 205
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 10:34 pm UTC

### Re: slightly excessive numbers

If you count the number itself, there would be no slightly defective numbers. I think that is what they were trying to get at.

Suffusion of Yellow
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 6:15 pm UTC

### Re: slightly excessive numbers

nash1429 wrote:I have read that although there are slightly defective numbers (divisors add up to one less that the number, counting each divsor only once, e.g. 4: 1+2=3), there do not appear to be any slightly excessive numbers even though their existence has not been proven or disproven. Why don't prime numbers count (such as 7*1=7 and 7+1=8)?

I think you might be confusing just divisors and prime divisors?