It is well known that the gamma function "fills in" the gaps left by the function f(x)=x!.
Consider, then, the function f(x)=∴(x), where ∴(n)= 1+2+3+4+5+6...+(n2)+(n1)+n.
What function would fill in the gaps, allowing us to evaluate (say) y=∴(π)?
"Filling in" a function
Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates
 dhokarena56
 Posts: 179
 Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:52 pm UTC
"Filling in" a function
Come join Dadapedia the opensource Dadaist novel that anyone can edit.
Re: "Filling in" a function
Well, [imath]\frac{1}{2}x(x+1)[/imath] would be a pretty good candidate.
 firechicago
 Posts: 621
 Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 12:27 pm UTC
 Location: One time, I put a snowglobe in the microwave and pushed "Hot Dog"
Re: "Filling in" a function
I remember reading a (likely apocryphal) story about Gauss that used that little fact. Little Carl Friedrich's school teacher wanted to shut the class up for a while, so he told them to add up all the numbers from 1 to 1000. He was very angry when Gauss had the temerity to announce that he was done after only a couple of minutes, and was even angrier when Gauss' answer was right.
Little Gauss had, of course, noticed that 1+2+...+1000 = (1+1000)+(2+999)+...+(500+501) = 500*1001 = 500,500
Little Gauss had, of course, noticed that 1+2+...+1000 = (1+1000)+(2+999)+...+(500+501) = 500*1001 = 500,500
Re: "Filling in" a function
There are plenty of functions that satisfy f(x+1) = f(x) + x + 1. You'll have to give another property that will define a unique function. For example, Gamma is the unique function that satisfies f(x+1)=xf(x), f(1)=1, and log convexity. Those properties together only belong to the Gamma function. You'll need a few more properties and then derive the formula just from those.
http://aselliedraws.tumblr.com/  surreal sketches and characters.
Re: "Filling in" a function
dhokarena56 wrote:It is well known that the gamma function "fills in" the gaps left by the function f(x)=x!.
Consider, then, the function f(x)=∴(x), where ∴(n)= 1+2+3+4+5+6...+(n2)+(n1)+n.
What function would fill in the gaps, allowing us to evaluate (say) y=∴(π)?
Wait, am I the only one that's confused here? What is y=∴(π)? I've never seen that before.
Re: "Filling in" a function
You haven't seen it before because he's just defined it in that post. By [imath]∴(\ \cdot\ )[/imath] he means the triangle number function, normally defined only on the natural numbers. He wants to know how to interpolate that function.

 Posts: 10
 Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 7:39 pm UTC
Re: "Filling in" a function
ive heard that story with 100, 50, bunches of numbers so
Re: "Filling in" a function
It's not really a terribly surprising story, I realized basically the same thing in grade 3. It was supposed to be a project to take up 3045 minutes, and I had figured out before the teacher finished 'explaining' it. I didn't think of it as an equation in my head though... I hadn't even been introduced to the concept of solving for variables at that point. I'm pretty sure I'm not as smart as Guass was, so the story is totally believable to me.
All Shadow priest spells that deal Fire damage now appear green.
Big freaky cereal boxes of death.
Re: "Filling in" a function
Same here. Though I added up all the numbers that became 100 (1+99, 2+98, etc) there where 49 such pairs, plus the 100 plus the 50 = 5050.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: doogly and 8 guests