why doesn't dark matter collapse into black holes?

For the discussion of the sciences. Physics problems, chemistry equations, biology weirdness, it all goes here.

Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates

User avatar
idobox
Posts: 1591
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 8:54 pm UTC
Location: Marseille, France

why doesn't dark matter collapse into black holes?

Postby idobox » Sat Feb 02, 2013 3:21 am UTC

I understand dark matter is not well understood. For example we don't know what it is, but the most popular hypothesis appears to be WIMPS.

In star formation, a cloud of gas collapses due to gravity, but pressure, then photonic pressure, then degeneration pressure counteract it.
If WIMPS do not interact with matter, they shouldn't be subject to the first two, and quickly form very dense objects. No?
If there is no answer, there is no question. If there is no solution, there is no problem.

Waffles to space = 100% pure WIN.

starslayer
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 9:58 am UTC

Re: why doesn't dark matter collapse into black holes?

Postby starslayer » Sat Feb 02, 2013 4:18 am UTC

Dark matter is collisionless and cannot easily get rid of energy or angular momentum. You have to remove lots of energy from gas to get it to collapse and form stars. Usually, this energy takes the form of photons the gas radiates as it collapses - for a long time, gas cloud collapse is isothermal. When it stops being isothermal, the collapse slows down dramatically. It basically doesn't collapse for the same reason globular clusters don't collapse to a single point (stars in a GC behave much the same way as DM WIMPs do in their interactions with each other).

User avatar
idobox
Posts: 1591
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 8:54 pm UTC
Location: Marseille, France

Re: why doesn't dark matter collapse into black holes?

Postby idobox » Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:39 am UTC

I didn't realize WIMPS do no interact with each other. I suppose gravitational waves take a long time to extract energy.
If there is no answer, there is no question. If there is no solution, there is no problem.

Waffles to space = 100% pure WIN.

starslayer
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 9:58 am UTC

Re: why doesn't dark matter collapse into black holes?

Postby starslayer » Sat Feb 02, 2013 5:44 pm UTC

The way they interact is in the name: Weakly Interacting, as in, via the weak interaction. The interaction cross section, should two meet up, is tiny, and their number density is similar to that of typical interstellar gas. It takes quite a while for them to run into each other, and they usually just pass right on by when they do.

User avatar
idobox
Posts: 1591
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 8:54 pm UTC
Location: Marseille, France

Re: why doesn't dark matter collapse into black holes?

Postby idobox » Sat Feb 02, 2013 7:03 pm UTC

I didn't get that weakly meant that, I just thought it meant like, not a lot.

Aren't neutrinos exactly like that, except they're very light (if they even have a mass)? Is there room in the standard model for what would essentially be a heavy neutrino?
If there is no answer, there is no question. If there is no solution, there is no problem.

Waffles to space = 100% pure WIN.

User avatar
Diadem
Posts: 5654
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:03 am UTC
Location: The Netherlands

Re: why doesn't dark matter collapse into black holes?

Postby Diadem » Sun Feb 03, 2013 1:34 am UTC

idobox wrote:I didn't get that weakly meant that, I just thought it meant like, not a lot.

Aren't neutrinos exactly like that, except they're very light (if they even have a mass)? Is there room in the standard model for what would essentially be a heavy neutrino?

Yes. Neutrinos have in fact long been one of the possible explanations for what dark matter is, though I think they are discredited as a possible explanation these days.
It's one of those irregular verbs, isn't it? I have an independent mind, you are an eccentric, he is round the twist
- Bernard Woolley in Yes, Prime Minister

User avatar
eSOANEM
:D
Posts: 3652
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:39 pm UTC
Location: Grantabrycge

Re: why doesn't dark matter collapse into black holes?

Postby eSOANEM » Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:29 am UTC

Diadem wrote:
idobox wrote:I didn't get that weakly meant that, I just thought it meant like, not a lot.

Aren't neutrinos exactly like that, except they're very light (if they even have a mass)? Is there room in the standard model for what would essentially be a heavy neutrino?

Yes. Neutrinos have in fact long been one of the possible explanations for what dark matter is, though I think they are discredited as a possible explanation these days.


IIRC vanilla-neutrinos have been discounted, but "sterile" neutrinos which don't even interact weakly (so only interact gravitationally) have not.
my pronouns are they

Magnanimous wrote:(fuck the macrons)

Aiwendil
Posts: 313
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 8:53 pm UTC
Contact:

Re: why doesn't dark matter collapse into black holes?

Postby Aiwendil » Sun Feb 03, 2013 3:45 pm UTC

Neutrinos have in fact long been one of the possible explanations for what dark matter is, though I think they are discredited as a possible explanation these days.


That's right. The reason that ordinary neutrinos are not considered a possible explanation of dark matter is that astronomical and Cosmological observations indicate the dark matter must be 'cold' - that is, non-relativistic. But since neutrinos are so light, they are essentially always ultra-relativistic.


Return to “Science”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests