Hype your ripe snipes 'n' gripes

Things that don't belong anywhere else. (Check first).

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

User avatar
TaintedDeity
Posts: 4003
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:22 pm UTC
Location: England;

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby TaintedDeity » Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:42 pm UTC

Your butt is out of this world.
Ⓞⓞ◯

User avatar
Fractal_Tangent
Today is my Birthday!
Posts: 923
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 9:34 pm UTC
Location: Here, I suppose. I could be elsewhere...

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby Fractal_Tangent » Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:54 pm UTC

I told you, TD, boyfriend goes with the term 'Astronomical Ass'.
eSOANEM wrote:
right now, that means it's Nazi punching time.


she/her/hers
=]

User avatar
doogly
Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
Posts: 5526
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
Location: Lexington, MA
Contact:

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby doogly » Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:58 pm UTC

Oh hey, I had forgotten about the whole UK pants thing. That made that link more interesting.
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.

Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?

User avatar
ExplodingHat
Posts: 195
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:15 am UTC
Location: Land of Smog and Sunsets

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby ExplodingHat » Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:31 am UTC

Carpenter ants. :evil:
Some call it luck, I call it "subconscious planning".

User avatar
ArgonV
Posts: 1792
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:08 pm UTC
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby ArgonV » Thu Apr 19, 2012 11:57 pm UTC

Sure, I realize you chose some other guy over me. I respect that. BUT COULD YOU STOP SHOWING UP IN HOTPANTS AT MY PLACE? It's like 10 degrees outside and they make me wanna do some real naughty things to you...

User avatar
ameretrifle
Vera
Posts: 814
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 6:32 am UTC
Location: Canada (the flat bit)

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby ameretrifle » Sat Apr 21, 2012 7:49 pm UTC

-Get an interview for a job I really don't want
-Spend a few days angsting over whether to decline or go for the interview experience
-Decide to decline, and call a few days before the interview like a responsible adult
-Very cordial phone conversation, "I don't think I'm the best fit for this position but please if there's ANYTHING else literally ANY OTHER POSITION YOU COULD EVER HAVE EXCEPT THIS ONE"
-Hang up
-Feel good about making an important decision somewhat promptly and decisively for once in my life, instead of waiting to deliberate over the weekend like I normally might
-Get called back and asked to reconsider, at least for the interview experience.
-And call him back on Tuesday with my decision.

I'm not ACTUALLY going to worry myself to death all weekend but the irony is killing me. XD

Probably should've just said "no, no really I'm quite sure" but....

"no really I know that getting interview experience is very good and that there's a lot of people with experience applying to these things and i might be interviewing for a long time and it's good to get familiar with the questions I HAVE BEEN AT THIS FOR A YEAR SIR I WAS KIND OF AWARE"

siiiiigh XD

User avatar
PictureSarah
Secretary of Penile Nomenclature
Posts: 4576
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 8:37 pm UTC
Location: Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby PictureSarah » Sat Apr 21, 2012 9:51 pm UTC

If you're so sure you don't even wan to interview for said job, then why did you apply?
"A ship is safe in harbor, but that's not what ships are for."

User avatar
SlyReaper
inflatable
Posts: 8015
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:09 pm UTC
Location: Bristol, Old Blighty

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby SlyReaper » Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:23 pm UTC

I think recruitment companies just spam your CV to any company they think they can get away with.
Image
What would Baron Harkonnen do?

User avatar
t1mm01994
Posts: 299
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 7:16 pm UTC
Location: San Francisco.. Wait up, I'll tell you some tales!

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby t1mm01994 » Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:30 pm UTC

AARGH RAARGH GF SO FRUSTRATING I SHOULD PROBABLY BREAK UP BUT I LOVE HER. (does this count as panting? I'll add more dots on my next try)

User avatar
Jave D
chavey-dee
Posts: 1042
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 4:41 pm UTC

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby Jave D » Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:39 pm UTC

I had a pant but after typing out the pant it seemed incredibly petty and unneeded. NOW I HAVE NOTHING TO PANT ABOUT. GRAWRRR!!!

User avatar
ameretrifle
Vera
Posts: 814
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 6:32 am UTC
Location: Canada (the flat bit)

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby ameretrifle » Sun Apr 22, 2012 12:56 am UTC

PictureSarah wrote:If you're so sure you don't even wan to interview for said job, then why did you apply?

The reminder of my blunder is appreciated. >_< Thank you.

Of course it's not my fault I didn't mention I also have issues about ever posting anything for fear someone will actually reply to me and point out I'm just being an asshole. This is a lovely ironic day. Facing fears! Building character. :3 Not so bad at all!

I'm not particularly intimidated by the interview, it's the prospect of being offered the job. I'd feel like even more of an entitled asshole turning down a job offer than I did turning down an interview. Hitherto the place in question hadn't sent me so much as a rejection letter (after applying to various openings over a span of at least 6 months). All the job advice sites (All. of. them. As well as this guy. It's REALLY a pretty common idea) tell you "Hey, apply to whatever you can, at the least it will be experience, right????" When I thought the odds were near zero, somehow it seemed slightly less threatening. Can't fathom why. :P

...Maybe the rant thread needs to be some sort of safespace. If you're bothered enough to need it, you're really probably not in the mood for discussion/unsolicited advice/argument/anything like that.

User avatar
The Scyphozoa
Posts: 2871
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 6:33 pm UTC
Location: Sector 5

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby The Scyphozoa » Sun Apr 22, 2012 3:18 pm UTC

Yes, in fact we've already been over how unsolicited advice should be in spoilers.
Image
3rdtry wrote:If there ever is another World War, I hope they at least have the decency to call it "World War 2: Episode One"

doogly wrote:murder is a subset of being mean

User avatar
Menacing Spike
Posts: 2982
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:25 pm UTC
Location: Fighting the Zombie.

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby Menacing Spike » Sun Apr 22, 2012 6:06 pm UTC

Arrrh why isn't my robot MLP learning code working!?

[hours and hours of debugging]

wait... could it be... no... let's check though....


void turnright()
{rotate(-PI/10);
}
void turnleft()
{rotate(-PI/10);
}

WHY

JZIJREAIPTJ4ITj

User avatar
Giant Speck
Bouncy Sex Marshmallow
Posts: 3819
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 12:30 pm UTC
Location: Tucson, Arizona

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby Giant Speck » Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:15 am UTC

I'm beginning to hate my car. The air conditioner doesn't work, the windshield needs replaced, the "check engine" light is on, and I'm having intermittent transmission problems. :(
"Did I say recently that I love Giant Speck? Because I love Giant Speck. He is the best." - Weeks
BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE

User avatar
Amie
Posts: 910
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:34 am UTC
Location: in Somnia.

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby Amie » Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:39 am UTC

Stuff happened that I really can't bring myself to elaborate upon. I can has hugs? >.<
Summer is miles and miles away, and no one would ask me to stay.
And I, should contemplate this change... to ease the pain.
And I, should step out of the rain... turn away.

User avatar
Giant Speck
Bouncy Sex Marshmallow
Posts: 3819
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 12:30 pm UTC
Location: Tucson, Arizona

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby Giant Speck » Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:40 am UTC

Of course!
"Did I say recently that I love Giant Speck? Because I love Giant Speck. He is the best." - Weeks
BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE

User avatar
Hyphe
Posts: 577
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 6:55 pm UTC
Location: South of the river

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby Hyphe » Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:46 am UTC

*hugs for Amie*

*hugs for anyone else who wants them, too*

User avatar
roband
Posts: 2545
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 2:52 pm UTC
Location: UK

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby roband » Mon Apr 23, 2012 8:22 am UTC

30 shots on goal, THIRTY SHOTS, and not one of them goes in... I drove >300 miles in one day to see MySportsTeam play and they lost 1-0 after dominating the game completely. My first visit to see them play live and also my first visit to the home stadium. A great day out but the result just put a real dampener on it.

User avatar
Amie
Posts: 910
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:34 am UTC
Location: in Somnia.

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby Amie » Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:06 am UTC

Thank you for the hugs.
Summer is miles and miles away, and no one would ask me to stay.
And I, should contemplate this change... to ease the pain.
And I, should step out of the rain... turn away.

User avatar
Plasma Man
Posts: 2035
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:27 am UTC
Location: Northampton, Northampton, Northampton middle England.

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby Plasma Man » Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:56 am UTC

GRAAAAAAHHHH!!! WHY AM I THE ONLY PERSON THAT USES THEIR BRAIN ROUND HERE?!?!?!
Please note that despite the lovely avatar Sungura gave me, I am not a medical doctor.

Possibly my proudest moment on the fora.

User avatar
Whelan
Posts: 2214
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 1:16 pm UTC
Location: Londonshire.

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby Whelan » Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:52 pm UTC

Scumbag brain. Scumbag pigeons. Scumbag bank.
"I like to be understood whenever I open my mouth; I have a horror of blinding people with science"- Richard Dawkins
Weeks wrote:
TaintedDeity wrote:And all I get is this tame space dragon. Where's my recognition?!
A tame dragon is its own reward.

User avatar
Jave D
chavey-dee
Posts: 1042
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 4:41 pm UTC

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby Jave D » Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:53 pm UTC

Alarm clock at 5? OK, I get it. Not waking up cuz the alarm clock is not alarmy enough? I get it too. Second alarm clock in case the first one doesn't work cuz you're on sleeping medications? I get it. Not waking up cuz of that one either? ARGH. Stomping around the room for two hours doing whatever while I'm trying in vain to catch that non-medicated and increasingly hard to attain sleep? ARGH.

User avatar
Magnanimous
Madmanananimous
Posts: 3491
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:11 pm UTC
Location: Land of Hipsters and Rain (LOHAR)

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby Magnanimous » Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:40 pm UTC

I am really, really horrible at sleeping. More specifically, waking up. I keep yelling at my body to get out of bed and do something, but it just lays there like a useless sack of mprotein.

User avatar
torontoraptor
Posts: 442
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 11:58 pm UTC

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby torontoraptor » Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:01 pm UTC

Dammit Blogger. Crashing when I switch to html mode? Not cool. Especially when it means I lose something that was actually well written. Baaah.
Promicin wrote:Now if I can just grab on with my tongue-like foot... wait. I am not a mussel.

pseudoidiot wrote:
You, sir, name? wrote:fucking owls is enjoyable.
Someone should sig this

User avatar
fizzgig
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 10:35 am UTC
Location: Canberra, Australia

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby fizzgig » Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:08 am UTC

Fuck you Word. I need to put a large table on a page in landscape mode part way through the document. I don't want to start a new section and I especially don't want the header and footer off the first page to appear half way through my fucking document. I just want a landscape fucking page with the normal fucking header and footer.

Hm. With that amount of fucking, I should have little baby Word documents running around all over the place in no time.

User avatar
rrwoods
Posts: 1509
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 5:57 pm UTC
Location: US

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby rrwoods » Tue Apr 24, 2012 2:56 am UTC

dhokarena56 wrote:hideous festival of debauchery and wanton perversion known as Anthrocon

aaaaaaaaaaaaand foe'd.
31/M/taken/US
age/gender/interest/country

Belial wrote:The sex card is tournament legal. And I am tapping it for, like, six mana.

User avatar
Dobblesworth
Dobblesworth, here's the title you requested over three years ago. -Banana
Posts: 1429
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:06 pm UTC
Contact:

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby Dobblesworth » Tue Apr 24, 2012 4:18 am UTC

I think I'm going to have to give up on correcting people.

"This event has a 5% chance of occurring each time. Each iteration is fully independent of all other preceeding iterations. So the average number of iterations we need to take until we get the event we want is 20!"
[I am right in thinking that's not how probability and statistics work right?]
<insert 'Someone Is Wrong On The Internet' here>

User avatar
Magnanimous
Madmanananimous
Posts: 3491
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:11 pm UTC
Location: Land of Hipsters and Rain (LOHAR)

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby Magnanimous » Tue Apr 24, 2012 4:45 am UTC

Dobblesworth wrote:"This event has a 5% chance of occurring each time. Each iteration is fully independent of all other preceeding iterations. So the average number of iterations we need to take until we get the event we want is 20!"
Ouch.

This situation is kind of cool actually, since it goes against human intuition so much. If each lottery ticket has a 1/x chance of winning and you buy x tickets, the odds of at least one winning is only about 63.21%* if x is sufficiently large.

*specifically, (e-1)/e

User avatar
SlyReaper
inflatable
Posts: 8015
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:09 pm UTC
Location: Bristol, Old Blighty

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby SlyReaper » Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:32 am UTC

Magnanimous wrote:
Dobblesworth wrote:"This event has a 5% chance of occurring each time. Each iteration is fully independent of all other preceeding iterations. So the average number of iterations we need to take until we get the event we want is 20!"
Ouch.

This situation is kind of cool actually, since it goes against human intuition so much. If each lottery ticket has a 1/x chance of winning and you buy x tickets, the odds of at least one winning is only about 63.21%* if x is sufficiently large.

*specifically, (e-1)/e

Except anyone buying that many tickets would make sure each one was unique, which takes away the "independent" thing.
Image
What would Baron Harkonnen do?

User avatar
Magnanimous
Madmanananimous
Posts: 3491
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:11 pm UTC
Location: Land of Hipsters and Rain (LOHAR)

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby Magnanimous » Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:44 am UTC

Okay, so it was a bad metaphor. You get the idea.

User avatar
e^iπ+1=0
Much, much better than Gooder
Posts: 2065
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 9:41 am UTC
Location: Lancaster

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby e^iπ+1=0 » Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:53 am UTC

Additionally, the chance of winning in Dobblesworth's problem is static, not 1/x. And the quantity asked for was the average number of tickets you need to win, not the chance that you win given you buy x tickets, although I admit I'm not sure of the exact relationship between the two.
poxic wrote:You, sir, have heroic hair.
poxic wrote:I note that the hair is not slowing down. It appears to have progressed from heroic to rocking.

(Avatar by Sungura)

User avatar
The Scyphozoa
Posts: 2871
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 6:33 pm UTC
Location: Sector 5

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby The Scyphozoa » Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:01 am UTC

I don't think that's what Magnanimous meant -- the probability wasn't supposed to depend on the number of tickets you buy, you were meant to buy a number of tickets depending on what you know the probability to be. I think.
Image
3rdtry wrote:If there ever is another World War, I hope they at least have the decency to call it "World War 2: Episode One"

doogly wrote:murder is a subset of being mean

User avatar
e^iπ+1=0
Much, much better than Gooder
Posts: 2065
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 9:41 am UTC
Location: Lancaster

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby e^iπ+1=0 » Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:07 am UTC

poxic wrote:You, sir, have heroic hair.
poxic wrote:I note that the hair is not slowing down. It appears to have progressed from heroic to rocking.

(Avatar by Sungura)

User avatar
Magnanimous
Madmanananimous
Posts: 3491
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:11 pm UTC
Location: Land of Hipsters and Rain (LOHAR)

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby Magnanimous » Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:37 am UTC

Right, I was talking about something kind of related.

... Actually, if you want the mean number of trials before a positive, it might be 20 in that case. According to my vague recollection of college stats and a quick simulation from my Ti-84 (x̅ = 20.3).

User avatar
e^iπ+1=0
Much, much better than Gooder
Posts: 2065
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 9:41 am UTC
Location: Lancaster

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby e^iπ+1=0 » Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:48 am UTC

Assuming this is what we're talking about, I think 20 is actually the right answer.
poxic wrote:You, sir, have heroic hair.
poxic wrote:I note that the hair is not slowing down. It appears to have progressed from heroic to rocking.

(Avatar by Sungura)

User avatar
emceng
Posts: 3167
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 9:38 pm UTC
Location: State of Hockey
Contact:

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby emceng » Tue Apr 24, 2012 2:49 pm UTC

e^iπ+1=0 wrote:Assuming this is what we're talking about, I think 20 is actually the right answer.


It's been a while since my probability class, but I am fairly sure 20 is not correct. At least the way i read the problem. I am reading it this way:

5% chance for an event to occur
When will we get a success? Try to get a success x times. Find the average # of tries it takes to get a success.

20 is not the right answer, because at 20 you'll have a high chance of having a success. The # should be around 13-14 I think. Because despite the results being independent, your odds of having a success(or not having had a success yet) will change as you go on. So....at 10 attempts, the odds of no success would be (1-.05)^10 = 60%.
When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up. - CS Lewis

User avatar
Yakk
Poster with most posts but no title.
Posts: 11115
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:27 pm UTC
Location: E pur si muove

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby Yakk » Tue Apr 24, 2012 3:32 pm UTC

Dobblesworth wrote:I think I'm going to have to give up on correcting people.

"This event has a 5% chance of occurring each time. Each iteration is fully independent of all other preceeding iterations. So the average number of iterations we need to take until we get the event we want is 20!"
[I am right in thinking that's not how probability and statistics work right?]
<insert 'Someone Is Wrong On The Internet' here>

Sure, for some meanings of average. :)

There is this (interpretations for which the answer isn't 20)
If you want a 99.9% chance of the event occurring some time in your experiment, you'll need ln(.001)/ln(.95) =~ 135 iterations in your experiment.
If you want a 99% chance of the event occurring some time in your experiment, you'll need ln(.01)/ln(.95) =~ 90 iterations in your experiment.
If you want a 95% chance of the event occurring some time in your experiment, you'll need ln(.05)/ln(.95) =~ 58 iterations in your experiment.
If you want a 50% chance of the event occurring some time in your experiment, you'll need ln(.5)/ln(.95) =~ 14 iterations in your experiment.

And then there is these (questions for which the answer is 20).
If, after 1 billion experiments, you want there to be about 1 billion events (plus or minus some millions), each experiment should consist of 1/.05 = 20 iterations.
You run 1 billion experiments, where you iterate until you get an event. If you average the number of iterations, you almost certainly get something really close to 20.
Last edited by Yakk on Wed Apr 25, 2012 7:02 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.
One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision - BR

Last edited by JHVH on Fri Oct 23, 4004 BCE 6:17 pm, edited 6 times in total.

User avatar
felltir
has a sniper scope and a trigger finger.
Posts: 2493
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 5:01 pm UTC
Location: Back in't home town. Never at home.
Contact:

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby felltir » Tue Apr 24, 2012 11:09 pm UTC

rrwoods wrote:
dhokarena56 wrote:hideous festival of debauchery and wanton perversion known as Anthrocon

aaaaaaaaaaaaand foe'd.

That post was made on the 6th o' February.

Having a catch-up? :P
Spoiler:
RoadieRich wrote:He's a super flexible furry martial artist from London. She is a Rabbit breeding mad scientist from Michigan. They fight crime!
The Great Hippo wrote:I THINK THE SOLAR SYSTEM MIGHT BE AN ATOM OF OXYGEN.


Blog

he/him/his

User avatar
Hofstadter'sLaw
Posts: 154
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 4:09 am UTC

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby Hofstadter'sLaw » Wed Apr 25, 2012 3:05 am UTC

One of my favorite professors that I haven’t seen in a year e-mailed me how I was doing. I replied and asked questions about things he was doing the last time I saw him. It’s been over a week, and I haven’t heard from him.

Now I feel like shit because I keep wondering if he’s disappointed in me and doesn’t want to talk to me because I mentioned that I started a minimum wage job that has nothing to do with my major right after I graduated.

He initiated the contact. He could have at least replied. >_>

User avatar
Cathy
Posts: 850
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 5:31 am UTC
Location: TX, USA

Re: Pant Thread (because we need more panting)

Postby Cathy » Wed Apr 25, 2012 4:14 am UTC

Hofstadter'sLaw wrote:One of my favorite professors that I haven’t seen in a year e-mailed me how I was doing. I replied and asked questions about things he was doing the last time I saw him. It’s been over a week, and I haven’t heard from him.

Now I feel like shit because I keep wondering if he’s disappointed in me and doesn’t want to talk to me because I mentioned that I started a minimum wage job that has nothing to do with my major right after I graduated.

He initiated the contact. He could have at least replied. >_>

Email him again! And again! Give it 2-3 days between emails, but seriously, those guys get *really* busy. 37 unread emails every morning... especially since it's hitting end of the semester.

Anyways, he's probably not disappointed. Everyone knows the job market sucks!

Bug the silly bastard, he's probably meaning to email you and just busy as shit.
Amie wrote:Cathy, I now declare you to be an awesome person, by the powers vested in me by nobody, really.
yurell wrote:We need fewer homoeopaths, that way they'll be more potent!


Return to “General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests