ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Things that don't belong anywhere else. (Check first).

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

User avatar
quadmaster
Posts: 192
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:39 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby quadmaster » Mon May 18, 2009 5:56 pm UTC

alt: wait! it only works for polygamy!?!?! damn you hari seldon!
Attachments
normal.JPG
nom?
normal.JPG (30.21 KiB) Viewed 7009 times
I... I didn't do it.
<- he did it, I swear

User avatar
DerDa
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 8:19 pm UTC
Location: Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby DerDa » Mon May 18, 2009 6:54 pm UTC

Not being lazy, I did 585:
Attachments
Sharks.png
We didn't think of that. We had everything simulated in python, though, but when we got flying sharks, we just did it our way.
Sharks.png (202.59 KiB) Viewed 6995 times
eiπ+1=0. Even in fairy tales.
Mathematics are awesome!

User avatar
Jorpho
Posts: 6279
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:31 am UTC
Location: Canada

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Jorpho » Mon May 18, 2009 7:38 pm UTC

I am impressed by the detail in your water splashes.

operator[]
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 6:11 pm UTC
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby operator[] » Mon May 18, 2009 7:57 pm UTC

Because of the awesomeness of this thread, I had to sign up and make some comics of my own (otherwise long-time reader, non-existant-time fora poster).

Spoiler:
References: http://xkcd.com/12/, http://xkcd.com/380/, alt hosting
poisson.png
I \u2665 unicode.
poisson.png (342.82 KiB) Viewed 6921 times
Spoiler:
References: http://xkcd.com/353/, alt hosting
python.png
Changing the order of jetpack-using and medicine-sampling makes it far wierder.
python.png (102.37 KiB) Viewed 6921 times
(derived from Dobbleworth's entry on page 4)
Spoiler:
References: http://xkcd.com/327/, alt hosting
sw_xss_exploits.png
Subtle note: 64976 is FDD0 in hexadecima"><!--XSS
sw_xss_exploits.png (68.01 KiB) Viewed 6914 times
Spoiler:
References: http://xkcd.com/404/, alt hosting
200.png
Whew, for a second I thought I would get a 404 there.
200.png (3.42 KiB) Viewed 6911 times
Spoiler:
References: http://xkcd.com/573/, alt hosting
parental_trolling.png
Joke aside, that would be pretty awesome. Every time someone upsets you, that person would get automatically rickrolled.
parental_trolling.png (64.5 KiB) Viewed 6914 times
Spoiler:
References: http://xkcd.com/582/, alt hosting
brakes.png
It was the funniest 6.5 seconds of my life, although as usual like 80% of it was just me trying to imagine all the other people laughing.
brakes.png (10.77 KiB) Viewed 6905 times
Last edited by operator[] on Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:17 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
bigglesworth
I feel like Biggles should have a title
Posts: 7461
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 9:29 pm UTC
Location: Airstrip One

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby bigglesworth » Mon May 18, 2009 8:02 pm UTC

200 is genius! Good show.
Generation Y. I don't remember the First Gulf War, but do remember floppy disks.

User avatar
quadmaster
Posts: 192
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:39 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby quadmaster » Mon May 18, 2009 8:41 pm UTC

which one is 200?
I... I didn't do it.
<- he did it, I swear

User avatar
RedWolf
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 8:19 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby RedWolf » Mon May 18, 2009 9:27 pm UTC

quadmaster wrote:which one is 200?

200.png, that operator[] posted.

User avatar
Felstaff
Occam's Taser
Posts: 5175
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 7:10 pm UTC
Location: ¢ ₪ ¿ ¶ § ∴ ® © ™ ؟ ¡ ‽ æ Þ ° ₰ ₤ ಡಢ

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Felstaff » Mon May 18, 2009 9:41 pm UTC

quadmaster wrote:which one is 200?

OK.

It's something Internet Explorer is yet to find.
Away, you scullion! you rampallion! You fustilarian! I'll tickle your catastrophe.

G50V
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:24 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby G50V » Mon May 18, 2009 11:03 pm UTC

Haven't posted in a while
I'm being lazy so I'm using the newest one
Attachments
outreach.png
Daddy, I don't like sharks anymore.
outreach.png (61.77 KiB) Viewed 6811 times

User avatar
bigglesworth
I feel like Biggles should have a title
Posts: 7461
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 9:29 pm UTC
Location: Airstrip One

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby bigglesworth » Mon May 18, 2009 11:25 pm UTC

I love it! Timesplitters right?
Generation Y. I don't remember the First Gulf War, but do remember floppy disks.

guyy
Posts: 610
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 3:02 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby guyy » Tue May 19, 2009 3:18 am UTC

585 +502 + 482:

Spoiler:
shark.jpg
shark.jpg (136.87 KiB) Viewed 6708 times
Actually, it was all part of the sharks' plan to attack the dolphins, which all left the Earth recently because...well, you know.

User avatar
Bulvox
Posts: 678
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 8:37 pm UTC
Location: Not Bunny
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Bulvox » Tue May 19, 2009 4:49 am UTC

guyy wrote:585 +502 + 482:

Spoiler:
shark.jpg
Actually, it was all part of the sharks' plan to attack the dolphins, which all left the Earth recently because...well, you know.
Nice HHGTTG reference. And a great comic too.
Image
See Ya Space Cowboy...

User avatar
velvet_octopus
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 6:45 am UTC
Location: 〈x〉 = ∫ dx ψ*(x,t) x ψ(x,t)

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby velvet_octopus » Tue May 19, 2009 5:44 am UTC

1st try . . . (man, GIMP is difficult without a real mouse)

Spoiler:
I want to be a scientist.jpg
I want to be a scientist.jpg (28.75 KiB) Viewed 6652 times

Alt text: Damn. I should have said "ask your mother."
<≤≥><≤≥><≤≥><≤≥><≤≥><≤≥><≤≥><≤≥><≤≥><≤≥><≤≥><≤≥><≤≥><≤≥><≤≥><≤≥><≤≥><≤≥><≤≥><≤≥><≤≥><≤≥><≤≥><≤≥>

operator[]
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 6:11 pm UTC
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby operator[] » Tue May 19, 2009 6:00 am UTC

Okay then, more 404 comics (also because they can be created in less than 15 minutes) - hopefully people aren't tired of them yet:

Spoiler:
References: http://xkcd.com/404/, alt hosting
418.png
"I'm a teapot" is actually a real status code, defined in RFC 2324.
418.png (12.48 KiB) Viewed 6659 times
Spoiler:
References: http://xkcd.com/404/, alt hosting
300.png
"Captain, the Spartans have captured the "Multiple Choices" HTTP status code! What do we do?"
300.png (2.31 KiB) Viewed 6657 times
Last edited by operator[] on Mon Jan 25, 2010 9:25 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.

Random832
Posts: 2525
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 4:38 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Random832 » Tue May 19, 2009 1:08 pm UTC

300.png
What do you call it when you make xkcdsw slightly worse?
300.png (7.55 KiB) Viewed 6561 times

User avatar
Alzheimers
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:48 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Alzheimers » Wed May 20, 2009 4:29 pm UTC

Inappropriate?
Spoiler:
This post had objectionable content.


Rape jokes. Not funny. - Hammer
Last edited by Alzheimers on Wed May 20, 2009 5:41 pm UTC, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Gojoe
Posts: 3218
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:45 pm UTC
Location: New Zealand!!!

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Gojoe » Wed May 20, 2009 4:45 pm UTC

You should put a warning on the spoiler.
michaelandjimi wrote:Oh Mr Gojoe
I won't make fun of your mojo.
Though in this fora I serenade you
I really only do it to aid you.
*Various positive comments on your masculinity
That continue on into infinity*

Feeble accompanying guitar.

User avatar
SecondTalon
SexyTalon
Posts: 26519
Joined: Sat May 05, 2007 2:10 pm UTC
Location: Louisville, Kentucky, USA, Mars. HA!
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby SecondTalon » Wed May 20, 2009 4:59 pm UTC

Alzheimers wrote:Inappropriate?
Spoiler:
No means No.jpg
Highly.
Normally you may expect a "But funny all the same" after that highly.

You won't find that here.
heuristically_alone wrote:I want to write a DnD campaign and play it by myself and DM it myself.
heuristically_alone wrote:I have been informed that this is called writing a book.

User avatar
Mous
Posts: 442
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 12:00 am UTC
Location: Virginia

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Mous » Wed May 20, 2009 5:15 pm UTC

I laughed a lot.
Day after day, day after day,
We stuck, nor breath nor motion;
As idle as a painted ship
Upon a painted ocean.

User avatar
sophyturtle
I'll go put my shirt back on for this kind of shock. No I won't. I'll get my purse.
Posts: 3474
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 4:19 pm UTC
Location: it's turtles all the way down, even in the suburbs
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby sophyturtle » Wed May 20, 2009 7:01 pm UTC

You might be a terrible person. especially for such obvious tortoise abuse. put that on top of the finding sexual assault funny and the might slides right out. but really both of you.
Just a warning.
I want to get to a place where I am neither conforming nor rebelling but simply being.

User avatar
Alder
Posts: 738
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:20 am UTC
Location: Scotland

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Alder » Wed May 20, 2009 7:48 pm UTC

Woah. Way to misjudge the general attitude of the forum, Alzheimers. :roll:
Plasma Man wrote:I might have to get rid of some of my breadbins.

Kulantan wrote:I feel a great disturbance in the Fora, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and then kinda trailed off to a grumble.

User avatar
Mous
Posts: 442
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 12:00 am UTC
Location: Virginia

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Mous » Wed May 20, 2009 7:51 pm UTC

I think I've already established myself as a terrible person on the forum.
Although you're right, the tortoise abuse -might- be unacceptable.
Day after day, day after day,
We stuck, nor breath nor motion;
As idle as a painted ship
Upon a painted ocean.

User avatar
TaintedDeity
Posts: 4003
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:22 pm UTC
Location: England;

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby TaintedDeity » Wed May 20, 2009 8:08 pm UTC

No, see, that was when it was appropriate to apologise, not make a joke about it.
Admit mistakes, whether they were accidental or not, it gets you further.
Ⓞⓞ◯

User avatar
Mous
Posts: 442
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 12:00 am UTC
Location: Virginia

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Mous » Wed May 20, 2009 8:12 pm UTC

I didn't make a mistake. I don't care if I've offended someone.
Day after day, day after day,
We stuck, nor breath nor motion;
As idle as a painted ship
Upon a painted ocean.

User avatar
kinigget
Posts: 721
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:56 pm UTC
Location: the wild wild west

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby kinigget » Wed May 20, 2009 8:47 pm UTC

you might want to rethink that sentiment.
The Mighty Thesaurus wrote:I can tell from his word choice that he is using his penis to type.

Steax wrote:I think the courts are kinda busy right now. Something about cake and due process.

User avatar
abitha
Posts: 278
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 7:05 pm UTC
Location: UK

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby abitha » Wed May 20, 2009 8:49 pm UTC

I missed whatever the highly objectionable 'slightly worse' was, and now I'm just confused. Maybe I lack the imagination to see how stick figures could have been so offensive... ah well, maybe that's for the best.

User avatar
muteKi
Angry is too weak a term. Try "Fluffy".
Posts: 372
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 4:02 am UTC
Location: William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby muteKi » Wed May 20, 2009 11:51 pm UTC

From http://xkcd.com/105/

Spoiler:
Killing XKCD.jpg
Killing XKCD.jpg (51.01 KiB) Viewed 5974 times
Last edited by muteKi on Thu May 21, 2009 3:00 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.
Image

User avatar
Haistfu
Posts: 548
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 8:11 pm UTC
Location: N/A

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Haistfu » Wed May 20, 2009 11:59 pm UTC

I don't even remember what the objectionable one was, and I read it earlier :?
Image

User avatar
Amnesiasoft
Posts: 2573
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 4:28 am UTC
Location: Colorado
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Amnesiasoft » Thu May 21, 2009 12:07 am UTC

It really, really isn't that difficult to figure out. Through other posts or just reading it.

User avatar
muteKi
Angry is too weak a term. Try "Fluffy".
Posts: 372
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 4:02 am UTC
Location: William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby muteKi » Thu May 21, 2009 1:38 am UTC

Incidentally is there any way to spoiler uploaded images? I realize mine is rather big but can't figure out how to do so.
Image

User avatar
Haistfu
Posts: 548
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 8:11 pm UTC
Location: N/A

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Haistfu » Thu May 21, 2009 1:43 am UTC

muteKi wrote:Incidentally is there any way to spoiler uploaded images? I realize mine is rather big but can't figure out how to do so.


Code: Select all

[spoiler][attachment=0]eeepc901black.jpg[/attachment][/spoiler]


Produces:

Spoiler:
eeepc901black.jpg
eeepc901black.jpg (85.55 KiB) Viewed 5895 times
Image

User avatar
phlip
Restorer of Worlds
Posts: 7572
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:56 am UTC
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby phlip » Thu May 21, 2009 2:38 am UTC

Note: to get that [attachment] bit: after you've uploaded the attachment, there should be a "Place Inline" button next to the attachment. That'll add the [attachment] bit to the message, which you can then wrap in [spoiler].

Code: Select all

enum ಠ_ಠ {°□°╰=1, °Д°╰, ಠ益ಠ╰};
void ┻━┻︵​╰(ಠ_ಠ ⚠) {exit((int)⚠);}
[he/him/his]

User avatar
muteKi
Angry is too weak a term. Try "Fluffy".
Posts: 372
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 4:02 am UTC
Location: William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby muteKi » Thu May 21, 2009 3:00 am UTC

Ah, thanks. Turns out I was looking in the wrong place for it -- the "place inline" feature I mean.
Image

User avatar
ccx
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 4:07 pm UTC
Location: Czech Republic
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby ccx » Fri May 22, 2009 1:56 am UTC

Hare Hare Yukai from Melancholy of Suzumia Haruhi. Couldn't get the tune out of my head for whole day.
Attachments
xkcd_harehareyukai.png
xkcd_harehareyukai.png (113.66 KiB) Viewed 5600 times
ཀརྨ་པ་མཁྱེན་ནོ།

User avatar
RedWolf
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 8:19 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby RedWolf » Fri May 22, 2009 4:21 am UTC

I actually thought this was the direction today's comic was going before I finished reading it:
587 541
Attachments
xkcd-541-587.png
xkcd-541-587.png (40.05 KiB) Viewed 5554 times

User avatar
phlip
Restorer of Worlds
Posts: 7572
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:56 am UTC
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby phlip » Fri May 22, 2009 4:35 am UTC

RedWolf wrote:587 541

If that was intentional, then well played.

Code: Select all

enum ಠ_ಠ {°□°╰=1, °Д°╰, ಠ益ಠ╰};
void ┻━┻︵​╰(ಠ_ಠ ⚠) {exit((int)⚠);}
[he/him/his]

User avatar
L33tsaber
Posts: 181
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 4:02 pm UTC
Location: Nebraska
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby L33tsaber » Fri May 22, 2009 5:39 am UTC

ccx wrote:Hare Hare Yukai from Melancholy of Suzumia Haruhi. Couldn't get the tune out of my head for whole day.


Aw, now I won't be able to either. To make matters worse, I know the dance and do bits of it (mostly the gestures with the right hand at the start of the chorus) without thinking whenever I have the song stuck in my head. Thanks a lot.

User avatar
quintopia
Posts: 2906
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 2:53 am UTC
Location: atlanta, ga

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby quintopia » Fri May 22, 2009 7:43 am UTC

just spent the last three hours catching up on the last three pages and it made me come up with one. . .but now it's too late to do it.

but, just as a note: the "i've never been so turned on in my life" had me on the floor. it's funny almost everywhere and it never gets old. please, moar!!!

User avatar
Alder
Posts: 738
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:20 am UTC
Location: Scotland

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Alder » Fri May 22, 2009 10:33 am UTC

RedWolf wrote:I actually thought this was the direction today's comic was going before I finished reading it:
587 541

Heh...me too. Nice work. :D
Plasma Man wrote:I might have to get rid of some of my breadbins.

Kulantan wrote:I feel a great disturbance in the Fora, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and then kinda trailed off to a grumble.

User avatar
Nosetroll
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 11:39 am UTC
Location: I like pi?

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Nosetroll » Fri May 22, 2009 11:12 am UTC

Well.. First thing that hit me..
Image
Alt text: This was the first and last time George spoke of math at a crime scene
Argh! I got a boogie man! It's eating my Brainz!!!


Return to “General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests