Page 125 of 125

Re: Logical fallacies/douchebaggery in commercials.

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 4:49 am UTC
by Giant Speck
I switched from AT&T to T-Mobile because of their change from "unlimited" to "not-really-unlimited-but-we're-going-to-call-it-unlimited-anyway".

Re: Logical fallacies/douchebaggery in commercials.

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 5:24 am UTC
by Pfhorrest
I switched from T-Mobile to AT&T because T-Mobile had terrible coverage at my new house due to their tower being on the other side of a hill from me.

AT&T promptly built a new tower of their own around the same spot, proudly bragged about it in a letter they sent out to all their customers in my area, and then apparently decommissioned the other tower because now my coverage is almost as bad as it was with T-Mobile.

Re: Logical fallacies/douchebaggery in commercials.

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 5:46 am UTC
by Giant Speck
Coverage was definitely a consideration when I was deciding whether to switch. Since I was only going to use the phone in the Gulfport-Biloxi, MS area and later on in Hawaii, where there is adequate T-Mobile coverage, it worked out. I did, however, fail to consider that I was going to drive across the country before heading out to Hawaii and that I'd encounter a lot of dead spots along the way (especially northern Mississippi and Missouri). I actually arrived in Iowa with the expectation that it wasn't going to work at all, but it turns out that T-Mobile partially owns Iowa Wireless, so I get roaming-free 3G coverage while I'm home with the parents.

Also, T-Mobile is planning to do a major network expansion this year and next, so hopefully, they'll have more 3G and LTE coverage throughout the country.

Re: Logical fallacies/douchebaggery in commercials.

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:00 am UTC
by Adacore
Giant Speck wrote:...but it turns out that T-Mobile partially owns Iowa Wilderness...

How I read that. Now I can't help imagining them as a front company for an evil supervillain in a James Bond film, with a secret underground base hidden in the desolate Iowa plains.

Re: Logical fallacies/douchebaggery in commercials.

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 4:05 pm UTC
by Tomlidich the second
Adacore wrote:
Giant Speck wrote: imagining them as a front company for an evil supervillain

This would not make me blink twice, if revealed to be true.

Re: Logical fallacies/douchebaggery in commercials.

Posted: Sat May 03, 2014 9:46 pm UTC
by 3rdtry
This ad for mother's day: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYOAWXeH6QI

#youchoose (but he doesn't)

Re: Logical fallacies/douchebaggery in commercials.

Posted: Sat May 03, 2014 10:20 pm UTC
by addams
3rdtry wrote:This ad for mother's day: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYOAWXeH6QI

#youchoose (but he doesn't)

AAHHHH!
Does that work?
Won't it tear under pressure?

SomeBody! Do the Methodology!
What kind of an Idea is That?

Bad Idea! Bad Idea!
Poor somebody. Poor little somebody.

To be fair, the female is at greater risk of both pregnancy and disease.
That's a practical joke? Of course, it is. Is the premise correct?

Will a condom perform correctly?
Will it appear to be performing correctly?

You do it!
I don't have one!

Yahoo says I am not The Weirdest person on the planet asking The Weirdest questions.
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/inde ... 531AA0QcbC

The best guess is The Device will fail at the punchure site.
Now; xkcd; Is it True?

We need to know.
Why? (shrug) Science.

Re: Logical fallacies/douchebaggery in commercials.

Posted: Sat May 03, 2014 10:53 pm UTC
by Giant Speck
3rdtry wrote:This ad for mother's day: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYOAWXeH6QI

#youchoose (but he doesn't)


Hollllllllllly (no pun intended) shit.

Re: Logical fallacies/douchebaggery in commercials.

Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 4:45 am UTC
by Samik
In the bathroom in my house there is a bottle of handsoap with the following directions printed on the back:

Use as you would use any hand soap.


Well, if directions for hand soap are not necessary, then those "directions" are not necessary. And, if directions for hand soap are necessary, then those "directions" do not help.

Re: Logical fallacies/douchebaggery in commercials.

Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 8:36 am UTC
by Djehutynakht
I was just watching a late-night commercial that went along the lines of "The Affordable Healthcare Bill might not go into effect until sometime in 2014".

Geniuses.

This year has a week left in it.

You need a new commercial.

Re: Logical fallacies/douchebaggery in commercials.

Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:01 am UTC
by Neil_Boekend
Menacing Spike wrote:
Rium wrote:I often see ads listing three (or more) benefits, X, Y, and Z, of some product, where Y is a consequence of X and Z, and not a direct consequence of using the product. That strikes me as slightly dishonest.


Doesn't (a=>b, b=>c) => (a=>c) ?

Rock, Paper, Scissors.

Re: Logical fallacies/douchebaggery in commercials.

Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 11:14 am UTC
by azule
Giant Speck wrote:I switched from AT&T to T-Mobile because of their change from "unlimited" to "not-really-unlimited-but-we're-going-to-call-it-unlimited-anyway".
What are the details? How is it not unlimited? Throttled speed?

Re: Logical fallacies/douchebaggery in commercials.

Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 11:39 am UTC
by Giant Speck
azule wrote:
Giant Speck wrote:I switched from AT&T to T-Mobile because of their change from "unlimited" to "not-really-unlimited-but-we're-going-to-call-it-unlimited-anyway".
What are the details? How is it not unlimited? Throttled speed?

Yeah, shortly after they discontinued their unlimited plans for new customers, they started throttling existing customers after reaching arbitrary data caps. I'd always get warnings if I hit three gigabytes that my data was about to be throttled.

Re: Logical fallacies/douchebaggery in commercials.

Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 1:10 pm UTC
by azule
Thanks. So, before that no throttling, full speed, unlimited? Is there any telecom that is like that, nowadays?