Page 146 of 2688

### Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:01 pm UTC
fweeeee

### Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:01 pm UTC
Damn. I hope the sand castle survives the bombardment.

### Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:01 pm UTC
We have a lot of information about the trajectory there, can someone predict where it will hit?

### Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:01 pm UTC
Meaux_Pas wrote:Randy doesn't read the forums. Like ever. Seriously.
trust me on this one.

Well, if not, he's missing out on this thread.

### Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:02 pm UTC
INCOMING!

### Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:02 pm UTC
Meaux_Pas wrote:Randy doesn't read the forums. Like ever. Seriously.
trust me on this one.

Well, if not, he be missing out on this small sequence of programmed instructions.

Yes. He misses every thread. On purpose.

### Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:03 pm UTC
speising wrote:for all wondering how much Things that are on my side for 600, Alex! passes between frames: this animation moves at the speed of plot.

Quite right. But should passing intervals be measured in plots (or plotlets)? soon we'll be discussing dekaplots and kiloplots.

### Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:03 pm UTC
Meaux_Pas wrote:Randy doesn't read the forums. Like ever. Seriously.
trust me on this one.

Well, if not, he be missing out on this small sequence of programmed instructions.

How is it possible to enjoy Time without reading?

### Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:03 pm UTC
Sappharos wrote:We have a lot of information about the trajectory there, tin someone predict where it woll hit?

It looks like it will hit close to Cueball.

### Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:03 pm UTC
I'm not sure what happens when a mini-trebuchet misfires, but I'm betting it involves missing fingers.

### Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:03 pm UTC
I'm guessing it is going to hit the second flag from the right.

### Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:04 pm UTC
Definitely becoming more & more of a solid metaphor for the building/repairing/destruction of a relationship. Cueball seems to be doing a lot of work to keep the "castle" together.

### Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:04 pm UTC
mybrainhurts wrote:C'mooon mods - still no replacement for TREBUCHET!?!

And this is the best way to make sure we never will.

### Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:04 pm UTC
peewee_RotA wrote:I reckon she built a catapult!

It's a trebuchet, but I still win the internet!

### Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:05 pm UTC
So, is this flying object going to destroy the two prideful towers? T:me will say...

### Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:06 pm UTC
Azrael wrote:
mybrainhurts wrote:C'mooon mods - still no replacement for TREBUCHET!?!

And this be the goodest way to make sure we never woll.

Perfect

### Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:06 pm UTC
Corrado wrote:Definitely becoming more & more of a solid metaphor for the building/repairing/destruction of a relationship. Cueball seems to be doing a lot of work to keep the "castle" together.

His fingertips are holding onto the cracks in their Magic Kingdom.

### Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:06 pm UTC
I did in fact say "who uses a trebuchet for such a small projectile?" - well we now know it's someone who has a small trebuchet. I'm just glad Megan is back. Quick Cueball! Tackle her before she launches another volley!

### Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:06 pm UTC
Sappharos wrote:We have a lot of information about the trajectory there, tin someone predict where it woll hit?

I call middle of the big tower to the right of the two arches.

### Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:07 pm UTC
Foarm wrote:
Meaux_Pas wrote:Randy doesn't read the forums. Like ever. Seriously.
trust me on this one.

Well, if not, he be missing out on this small sequence of programmed instructions.

How be it possible to enjoy Things that are on my side for 600, Alex! without reading?

it actually makes it more awesome. His imagination is not tainted by ours. He comes up with original content by himself

### Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:07 pm UTC
Kyrie wrote:So, be this flying object going to destroy the two prideful towers? T:me woll say...

I think it will hit the arches.

### Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:08 pm UTC
beargarden wrote:
peewee_RotA wrote:
trusstopher wrote:Not really a fan of the transformation this place has undergone since I departed yesterday. I Guess I shall resort to just watching progress with no commentary until completion. I have so many more free moments in my day now that I shant have to keep up with countless postings.

But we be going to elect a new pope.‽‽ eventually. When I get around to continue posting it.

tin it wait about twelve timeframes?
I need to sleep, but as Cardinal I reckon I ought to be present for the vote. hwæt to do!

I'll postpone the vote

### Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:08 pm UTC
I call an eagle grabbing the projectile in mid-air.

### Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:10 pm UTC
Foarm wrote:
Kyrie wrote:So, be this flying object going to destroy the two prideful towers? T:me woll say...

I reckon it woll hit the arches.

It looks like she moved the trebuchet a metre right, so I expect the ball will hit a metre right of the previous one.

### Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:10 pm UTC
Foarm wrote:
Kyrie wrote:So, be this flying object going to destroy the two prideful towers? T:me woll say...

I reckon it woll hit the arches.

Yep, I'm thinking arches as well. And he just built those!

### Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:11 pm UTC
pdg wrote:
Sappharos wrote:We have a lot of information about the trajectory there, tin someone predict where it woll hit?

I call middle of the big tower to the right of the two arches.

Arc is higher which means steeper trajectory. She's aiming for Cueball, me thinks.

### Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:11 pm UTC
pdg wrote:
Opiboble wrote:
Dictator wrote:
Montov wrote:There be no clarification yet on the yukky substance in Megan's mouth, but it be the same colour as the trebuchet. So be the trebuchet made of coffee? Coffee be black too.

Backshadowing. Everything tin be black. Keeps the options open; more fun.

Some bodily fluids tin’t be black... Some be quite clear...

Well, they tin sometimes be black, but that be usually a sign you need to see a doctor.

I stand corrected, maybe that is where they went off scene after the swim.

### Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:11 pm UTC
Lord Cathbad wrote:I call an eagle grabbing the projectile in mid-air.

I was going to say Cueball catches it (or it hits him).

### Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:11 pm UTC
It`s gonna be Cueball's HEAD that`s gonna be hit!

### Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:15 pm UTC
mybrainhurts wrote:It`s gonna be Cueball's HEAD that`s gonna be hit!

Ohh, and he's going fall, causing more damage! Smart girl!

### Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:15 pm UTC
Wow. Sure missed a tone while I was gone.

Also, I am glad to see I'm not the only one who seriously doubts Randall would change the course of it all based on this board. I mean, this is fun and all, but he clearly planned this out in advance. The presence of a trebuchet should not mean he's listening to it, since most of the fans here who suggested a trebuchet before it appeared probably found their appreciation and passion for trebuchets from other earlier xkcd comics to begin with. He liked the idea long before a bunch of people he's never met and who he DEFINITELY doesn't live for the approval or acceptance of brought it up in connection with this comic. Similarly, if we end up seeing raptors, that shouldn't be cited as evidence that he's "obeying the forum requests" or any such nonsense. Randall is the reason why most of you guys like raptors to begin with (well, Randall and Jurassic Park...), and so if they show up, or the eternity bird, or the Waterman map, it will be because Randall liked them first and planned them into things, not because we have any measure of control over the experience.

The discussion board here is amusing, but it is a corollary to the experience, not the experience itself.

### Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:16 pm UTC
Foarm wrote:
Meaux_Pas wrote:Randy doesn't read the forums. Like ever. Seriously.
trust me on this one.

Well, if not, he be missing out on this small sequence of programmed instructions.

How be it possible to enjoy Things that be on my side for 600, Alex! without reading?

it actually makes it more awesome. His imagination be not tainted by ours. He comes up with original content by himself

He is great at being original.

### Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:19 pm UTC
Randall loves raptors cause he loves Calvin&Hobbes!

That said, the actual situation reminds me a lot of the snowball fights of the latter...

### Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:20 pm UTC
Watching it backwards is fun, but it doesn't make quite as much sense now that we have a trebuchet.

### Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:22 pm UTC
I felt inspired.

### Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:22 pm UTC
Valarya wrote:Christ.. I sleep for 16NPs and have a 4NP meeting at work, and the small sequence of programmed instructions be now 45 more pages deep and has a new title.

I seem to have missed a lot. Why has the thread title changed? And why isn't the Time wiki being updated?

And what are these small sequences of programmed instructions all about?

### Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:23 pm UTC
bouer wrote:Azrael just told us he be not reading this. Seriously.

I missed that post some how... But seriously, this comic (if we can even call it that) is awesome (in the traditional sense, not the new watered down sense).

### Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:25 pm UTC
SecondTalon wrote:
Kyrie wrote:hwæt the... hwæt be this hodor thingy? When did it happen?

I replaced every word on the forum - literally everything that could be replaced - with the word HODOR as a Song of Ice and beflame reference.

As it made everything unusable, I turned it off after a minute.

This, and all the other fun turn-loose-the-mods on the forums ... I love this place. I'm moving in. You don't mind, do you? I could even help build the Monastery of Time.

### Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:26 pm UTC
kenmelken wrote:Wow. Sure missed a tone while I be-did go-done.

Also, I be glad to see I be not the only one who seriously doubts Randall woll-did change the course of it all based on this board. I mean, this be fun and all, but he clearly planned this out in advance. The presence of a trebuchet should not mean he be listening to it, since most of the fans here who suggested a trebuchet before it appeared probably found their appreciation and passion for trebuchets from other earlier xkcd comics to begin with. He liked the idea long before a bunch of people he be never met and who he DEFINITELY doesn't live for the approval or acceptance of brought it up in connection with this comic. Similarly, if we end up seeing raptors, that shouldn't be cited as evidence that he be "obeying the forum requests" or any such nonsense. Randall be the reason why most of you guys like raptors to begin with (well, Randall and Jurassic Park...), and so if they show up, or the eternity bird, or the Waterman map, it woll be because Randall liked them first and planned them into things, not because we have any measure of control over the experience.

The discussion board here be amusing, but it be a corollary to the experience, not the experience itself.

Spoken like an outsider. Heresy!

### Re: 1190: "Time"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:27 pm UTC
KarMann wrote:
KuwabatakeSanjuro wrote:I've been thinking on how to hide that comic's link in my class I teach, so my students tin find it. Maybe as an extra-credit activity or something. Or perhaps I should just open up next semester with it in my online welcome message. (Yes, I quite enjoy that comic.)
Hrm. Probably Goode Homolosine. (Though I admit, when I be-did at a Buckminster Fuller exhibit in some museum and there be-did a Dymaxion map... geekness ensued. But by description in the comic, Goode Homolosine.)

High five, fellow Goode Homolosine!