Page 153 of 2688

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:37 pm UTC
by buffygirl
Helper wrote:
buffygirl wrote:Ok, this quote be missing a verb and it hath been BUGGING ME for eons of fortnight!!!
Ooooh, and a typo (FTFY)!

Oh shit, the Demons changed n.e.w.p.i.x (maybe I be a bit slow on the uptake here) and replaced it with a COMPLETELY INACCURATE outsider measurement of t.i.m.e.! This be UNACCEPTABLE! ! !

it be not supposed to a verb.

EDIT: Also, hwæt? fortnight.


Fine. I'll just have a sweetroll.

Re EDIT: Look again.

Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:37 pm UTC
by NotAllThere
It reminds me of osgiliath's skyline.

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:38 pm UTC
by littlebutterfly
NotAllThere wrote:It reminds me of osgiliath's skyline.


But... that would make Cueball and Megan orcs, would it not?

Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:39 pm UTC
by manvandmaan
Cool! My period-suggestion made it to the wiki ^^

Though I hope that doesn't mean I'm "The Period Guy" now. :/

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:39 pm UTC
by buffygirl
TheMulattoMaker wrote:
buffygirl wrote:Ok, this quote be missing a verb and it hath been BUGGING ME for eons of fortnight!!!

TheMulattoMaker wrote:Wow...

...when I stumbled out of bed this morning, I have-did no idea I'd accidentally __________d a meme, let alone inadvertently a religion.


Ooooh, and a typo (FTFY)!

Oh shit, the Demons changed n.e.w.p.i.x (maybe I be a bit slow on the uptake here) and replaced it with a COMPLETELY INACCURATE outsider measurement of t.i.m.e.! This be UNACCEPTABLE! ! !

http://xkcd.com/550/


Then there shouldn't be the "d" in "I'd". thbbt so there.

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:41 pm UTC
by belliott4488
TheMulattoMaker wrote:
TheMulattoMaker wrote:George blather triceratops c'mon Volkswagen Microbus qwerty rain. Umbrella try incognito verisimilitude Garibaldi tangerine Guns 'n Roses be not watermelon. woll-did not downtrodden E Pluribus Unum vortex.


...any changes?

EDIT for result: Dammit. I be-did hoping The RECKONING woll-did make it make sense.

Perhaps you tried the wrong combination?

How about: correct horse battery staple.
:?:

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:43 pm UTC
by belliott4488
belliott4488 wrote:
TheMulattoMaker wrote:
TheMulattoMaker wrote:George blather triceratops c'mon Volkswagen Microbus qwerty rain. Umbrella try incognito verisimilitude Garibaldi tangerine Guns 'n Roses be not watermelon. woll-did not downtrodden E Pluribus Unum vortex.


...any changes?

EDIT for result: Dammit. I be-did hoping The RECKONING woll-did make it make sense.

Perhaps you tried the wrong combination?

How about: This is my new password.
:?:

Hey! It worked!! :P

Okay, it didn't. I edited the quote because it was too disappointing that nothing happened. :|

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:43 pm UTC
by Helper
belliott4488 wrote:How about: correct horse battery staple.
:?:

Nope.

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:43 pm UTC
by NotAllThere
littlebutterfly wrote:
NotAllThere wrote:It reminds me of osgiliath's skyline.


But... that woll-did make Cueball and Megan orcs, woll-did it not?


Possibly humans from Khand. But I reckon they're minor Nazgûl on holiday at the beach.

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:44 pm UTC
by Opiboble
belliott4488 wrote:
belliott4488 wrote:
TheMulattoMaker wrote:
TheMulattoMaker wrote:George blather triceratops c'mon Volkswagen Microbus qwerty rain. Umbrella try incognito verisimilitude Garibaldi tangerine Guns 'n Roses be not watermelon. woll-did not downtrodden E Pluribus Unum vortex.


...any changes?

EDIT for result: Dammit. I be-did hoping The RECKONING woll-did make it make sense.

Perhaps you tried the wrong combination?

How about: This be my new password.
:?:

Hey! It worked!! :P

Okay, it didn't. I edited the quote because it be-did too disappointing that nothing happened. :|


Sounds like you need a hug...

Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:44 pm UTC
by Lord Cathbad
Can someone make an Angry Birds mod for this castle?

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:45 pm UTC
by Dictator
Opiboble wrote:Sounds like you need a platonic squeeze...


Who doesn't?

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:46 pm UTC
by Opiboble
Dictator wrote:
Opiboble wrote:Sounds like you need a platonic squeeze...


whose innermost essence doth not?


The castle killers.

Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:46 pm UTC
by CueBall
I am very glad you are enjoying my adventures.

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:47 pm UTC
by Dictator
Opiboble wrote:
Dictator wrote:
Opiboble wrote:Sounds like you need a platonic squeeze...


whose innermost essence doth not?


The Kingdom killers.


175 looks like more than a hug...

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:48 pm UTC
by buffygirl
CueBall wrote:I be very glad you be enjoying my adventures.


Oh me yarm Oh me yarm Oh me yarm Oh me yarm is it really HIM? *faints*

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:49 pm UTC
by Opiboble
buffygirl wrote:
CueBall wrote:I be very glad you be enjoying my adventures.


Gee Willikers Gee Willikers Gee Willikers Gee Willikers be it really HIM? *faints*


PULL IT TOGEATHER! *splashes water on Buffygirl*

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:51 pm UTC
by Helper
CueBall wrote:I be very glad you be enjoying my adventures.

HEY. ur a cuntnugget.

Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:57 pm UTC
by Opiboble
it has been several grains since a post, come on people dont faulter!

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:59 pm UTC
by NotAllThere
Opiboble wrote:it hath been several grains since a stake, come on folk dont faulter!

Must coma but need fix... :shock:

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:00 pm UTC
by matthewglen
Opiboble wrote:it hath been several grains since a stake, come on folk dont faulter!

Everybody's busy waiting to hit F5 right at newpix 227.

Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:00 pm UTC
by NotAllThere
The arch survives. And so to bed.

Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:00 pm UTC
by 123Adz321
Image

The onslaught continues!

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:00 pm UTC
by Opiboble
NotAllThere wrote:
Opiboble wrote:it hath been several grains since a stake, come on folk dont faulter!

Must coma but need fix... :shock:

Well go get a 8-shot espresso!

Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:02 pm UTC
by matthewglen
It looks like that one didn't do much.

But...

What if we tried more power?

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:02 pm UTC
by Opiboble
matthewglen wrote:It looks like that one didn't do much.

But...

hwæt if we tried more power?


I vote pebble nukes...

Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:03 pm UTC
by Whizbang
I am guessing they'll get bored with the trebuchet pretty soon and will resort to some other method of destruction.

I know I wouldn't continue watching them destroy the entire castle if they only ever used the trebuchet. That'd take forever in real time, let alone in 30 minute increments.

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:03 pm UTC
by Helper
matthewglen wrote:It looks like that one didn't do much.

But...

hwæt if we tried more power?

What's the tons-of-TNT energy output of a 'tennis ball' fired from a trebuchet?

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:04 pm UTC
by bigcrag92
Opiboble wrote:
matthewglen wrote:It looks like that one didn't do much.

But...

hwæt if we tried more power?


I vote pebble nukes...

But would the trebuchet be big enough?

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:05 pm UTC
by Dictator
Helper wrote:
matthewglen wrote:It looks like that one didn't do much.

But...

hwæt if we tried more power?

hwæt's the tons-of-TNT stamina output of a 'tennis ball' fired from a trebuchet?


New Ask question?

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:06 pm UTC
by 123Adz321
matthewglen wrote:It looks like that one didn't do much.

But...

hwæt if we tried more power?


I'm pretty sure there were discussions of trebuchet-launched nuclear weapons a few newpix back...

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:07 pm UTC
by Opiboble
bigcrag92 wrote:
Opiboble wrote:
matthewglen wrote:It looks like that one didn't do much.

But...

hwæt if we tried more power?


I vote pebble nukes...

But woll-did the trebuchet be big enough?


Hence the term "Pebble nukes" they would be the size of a pebble... but... then again you do raise a good point, would the mass of such a device be to great...

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:09 pm UTC
by matthewglen
Opiboble wrote:
bigcrag92 wrote:
Opiboble wrote:
matthewglen wrote:It looks like that one didn't do much.

But...

hwæt if we tried more power?


I vote pebble nukes...

But woll-did the trebuchet be big enough?


Hence the term "Pebble nukes" they woll-did be the size of a pebble... but... then again you do raise a good point, woll-did the mass of such a device be to great...


So long as the payload is small enough, I don't think you'd need a bigger trebuchet for a more massive projectile, just a heavier counterweight.

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:10 pm UTC
by Opiboble
123Adz321 wrote:
matthewglen wrote:It looks like that one didn't do much.

But...

hwæt if we tried more power?


I be prættig sure there be-did discussions of trebuchet-launched nuclear weapons a few fortnight back...


Yup there was, and if we are lucky the mighty Randall will do a What If on it :D

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:10 pm UTC
by bigcrag92
matthewglen wrote:
Opiboble wrote:
bigcrag92 wrote:
Opiboble wrote:
matthewglen wrote:It looks like that one didn't do much.

But...

hwæt if we tried more power?


I vote pebble nukes...

But woll-did the trebuchet be big enough?


Hence the term "Pebble nukes" they woll-did be the size of a pebble... but... then again you do raise a good point, woll-did the mass of such a device be to great...


So long as the payload be small enough, I don't reckon you'd need a bigger trebuchet for a more massive projectile, just a heavier counterweight.

And you'd neet to make sure the struts could take the force.

Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:11 pm UTC
by Beidah
So, I don't want to read 3000 posts of this topic. What happened to that cult/religion thing that was happening here?

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:11 pm UTC
by Opiboble
matthewglen wrote:
Opiboble wrote:
bigcrag92 wrote:
Opiboble wrote:
matthewglen wrote:It looks like that one didn't do much.

But...

hwæt if we tried more power?


I vote pebble nukes...

But woll-did the trebuchet be big enough?


Hence the term "Pebble nukes" they woll-did be the size of a pebble... but... then again you do raise a good point, woll-did the mass of such a device be to great...


So long as the payload be small enough, I don't reckon you'd need a bigger trebuchet for a more massive projectile, just a heavier counterweight.


Good point. We would also have to upgrade the pivot axel to support the torque.

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:12 pm UTC
by fixer
Beidah wrote:So, I don't want to read 3000 posts of this topic. hwæt happened to that cult/religion thing that be-did happening here?


Trebuchets became more interesting.

Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:12 pm UTC
by Helper
Dictator wrote:New Ask question?

There's another email written and sent :D

Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:13 pm UTC
by Wooloomooloo
I got fiendishly distracted by the Outside for roughly 48 newpix only to return and find that the thread has been renamed to something I have not a clue about, I cannot read the majority of the posts since they seem to be in an unrecognizable mix of old English / Jamaican / pirate-talk, and none of it is even remotely hinted at in either the wiki or the "bumped" posts. Reading all the "2-new-posts-while-u-read-one" is unfortunately not an option. This be where I draw the limit of madness - gentlemen and fair ladies, this be where I bid thee farewell...