Page 1 of 13

1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 5:05 am UTC
by poxic
Image

Title text: "Perhaps you need a crash course in taking hints. Here's your first lesson: We're not actually walking somewhere together; I'm trying to leave this conversation and you're following me."

What women really want is ice cream. I assume this is true because I am a woman and I wish I had some ice cream right now.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 5:08 am UTC
by rhomboidal
Clearly, women don't want to know what they want to not want what they know they don't know to want what they want to know. Duh.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 5:09 am UTC
by CorruptUser
Oh dear. Randall insulted the "friendzoners" again.

EVERYONE, BATTLESTATIONS! Be on the lookout for rehashed MRA talking points and trilbies!

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 5:14 am UTC
by JustDoug
poxic wrote:What women really want is ice cream. I assume this is true because I am a woman and I wish I had some ice cream right now.


Yeah, but what flavor? You're probably one of those that outwardly goes on about low-fat vanilla being your favorite, but secretly buy rich calorie-bomb chocolate extravaganzas, thinking that you can burn off the extra 4,200 calories later with a brisk walk.

You face nothing but heartbreak. Why not settle down on the couch with a nice reduced fat yogurt and save yourself the pain?

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 5:21 am UTC
by keithl
poxic wrote:What women really want is ice cream. I assume this is true because I am a woman and I wish I had some ice cream right now.

Here you are!
Image
( I'm all out of zero-calorie dessicant packs, will strawberry cheesecake flavor do?)

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 5:40 am UTC
by addams
poxic wrote:[url=http://xkcd.com/1325/

What women really want is ice cream. I assume this is true because I am a woman and I wish I had some ice cream right now.

Now, I want ice cream, too.
Look what you have done.

Let's blame the comic.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 5:45 am UTC
by Eternal Density
I'm going to go buy some ice-cream to quench the flames. And the Summer heat.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 6:13 am UTC
by BAReFOOt
Arguing with moderation in a thread is a pretty good way to get banned around here. But shit-slinging at moderators at the same time? That should be universally understood to end poorly for the shit-slinger.

Dear Readers: There is now extremely limited purpose in arguing with this poster.

- Az



————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

What kind of stupid ad hominem argument is that? Has Randall become a stereotypical know-nothing white knight pro-sexism nerd now?

It seems he never actually talked to women. Nor does he understand female psychology. Instead it seems he got his infos from sexist magazines that cater to insecure women.

I talked to and consulted women all my adult life. And if you ask them, especially young women, what they want, by far the most will first say things like “I don’t know”, something very vague, or something they read somewhere that they’re supposed to want. And men are not much better nowadays, just so you know. They just never think about it (because that’s not “spontaneous”… another stupid meme the magazines put into people’s heads) or just plain don’t care. (“Not giving a fuck” has become a meme too, even though it’s literally half the definition of stupidity.)

But what women have in addition, is that they are more empathic and more susceptible to peer pressure (see: slut shaming [mostly done by women]). This, among more sensible intentions, causes them to hide their true intentions. Since if they openly blurted out that they just want to bang and fall in love madly and everything, a billion men would descend upon them, to spam them with requests… And a billion women and many men would call them “slut” because they think they have to, because they think that’s the group consensus, and because of jealousy.

Thirdly, if you ask any experienced woman (30+), she will tell you over and over again of the old dilemma: Nice family men are boring. And interesting adventure men are unfaithful. Somehow those two are mutually exclusive.
And, this has been studied, it actually is mutually exclusive. The former is a low level of testosterone. The latter a high level. Obviously you can’t have both at the same time.
But, an this is my point: Women normally say they want the former, but always go with the latter, hoping they can somehow “change” him.
It’s only when they become so old that they have given up, or when they boyfriend becomes the former during the relationship out of natural causes, that they take the former. Which will slowly start at 30–35 years.

What exactly about any of that is supposed to be “bad”? Anyone in that situation who is empathic and can become pregnant would react that way. Hell, I react that way in those situations!

So yes; yes indeed; women say they want one thing, but really want (and go for) another thing. So what??

It’s only you, Randall, and those magazine writers’ sexist minds, where such a statement becomes “belittlement”, implying that such a behavior somehow makes women “inferior”. Instead of just part of what it means to be a woman. The sad part is that you don’t realize that and call other people sexist for not being sexist! YOU think if it doesn’t work like men work, it must be inferior. And you should be ashamed of yourselves!

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

JustDoug wrote:You're probably one of those that outwardly goes on about low-fat vanilla being your favorite, but secretly buy rich calorie-bomb chocolate extravaganzas, thinking that you can burn off the extra 4,200 calories later with a brisk walk. […] You face nothing but heartbreak. Why not settle down on the couch with a nice reduced fat yogurt and save yourself the pain?


Have you been living behind the moon? You know that low-fat variants are less healthy, and make you even fatter, right? Please tell me you don’t still think fat makes people fat!
Because then I got some surprises for you:
In short words: Sugar & starch cause inflammation and growth of wrong bacteria not only in your mouth (where you brush your teeth against it), but in your entire digestive system. And THAT causes you to become fat from fat… and from everything else!

And no, calories do not matter AT ALL. If you have a healthy flora and don’t eat those dense carbs, you simply stop getting hungry before you can get fat, and because of the slow burn compared to carbs it will just take longer to be digested. That’s all. I’m living proof of that.

JustDoug wrote:Yeah, but what flavor?


Always the one you know the least. Keeps life interesting. And hence by definition gives you a longer life in retrospect. :)

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

CorruptUser wrote:Oh dear. Randall insulted the "friendzoners" again. EVERYONE, BATTLESTATIONS! Be on the lookout for rehashed MRA talking points and trilbies!


I wish people like you, who have nothing to contribute but arrogant-while-ignorant asshattery, would have the intelligence to realize they have nothing to contribute but how little they know and how much of an asshole they are, and shut up.

No triple posting, there's a notification of all the people ninja'ing you and an edit button, so use them
-Angua

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 6:47 am UTC
by da Doctah
What women want is shoes. Lots and lots of shoes. Their own shoes and shoes for other people.

I have tested this time and time again, and the results always confirm the hypothesis.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 7:15 am UTC
by Editer
CorruptUser wrote:Oh dear. Randall insulted the "friendzoners" again.

EVERYONE, BATTLESTATIONS! Be on the lookout for rehashed MRA talking points and trilbies!


1 hour 4 minutes. Those guys are slowing down.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 7:52 am UTC
by alun009
Uh oh.

Randall has ruined the comic-book device of showing people walking together as appearing one in front of the other. Now I will always see people in this configuration as fleeing/following.

The meaning of http://xkcd.com/77/ is very different now.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 8:18 am UTC
by Kazza3
Somewhere, Randall is reading this thread and laughing to himself at another job well done.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 8:20 am UTC
by Klear
BAReFOOt wrote:
CorruptUser wrote:Oh dear. Randall insulted the "friendzoners" again. EVERYONE, BATTLESTATIONS! Be on the lookout for rehashed MRA talking points and trilbies!


I wish people like you, who have nothing to contribute but arrogant-while-ignorant asshattery, would have the intelligence to realize they have nothing to contribute but how little they know and how much of an asshole they are, and shut up.


Oh the irony.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 8:30 am UTC
by ps.02
CorruptUser wrote:Oh dear. Randall insulted the "friendzoners" again.

At some point it became cliché to be a "friendzoner" (great term). I fear this comic is too late, though, as it has already become cliché to make fun of "friendzoners". Or perhaps I've just found a way to feel superior to both.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 8:37 am UTC
by Kit.
JustDoug wrote:
poxic wrote:What women really want is ice cream. I assume this is true because I am a woman and I wish I had some ice cream right now.


Yeah, but what flavor? You're probably one of those that outwardly goes on about low-fat vanilla being your favorite, but secretly buy rich calorie-bomb chocolate extravaganzas, thinking that you can burn off the extra 4,200 calories later with a brisk walk.

You face nothing but heartbreak. Why not settle down on the couch with a nice reduced fat yogurt and save yourself the pain?

Are you the guy on the left?

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 8:43 am UTC
by Aelfyre
Just to play Devil's Advocate.. the first guy might not have been belittling their judgement or self-awareness.
I find it much more likely he was belittling their capacity for honesty. :D

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 8:50 am UTC
by markfiend
BAReFOOt wrote:
CorruptUser wrote:Oh dear. Randall insulted the "friendzoners" again. EVERYONE, BATTLESTATIONS! Be on the lookout for rehashed MRA talking points and trilbies!


I wish people like you, who have nothing to contribute but arrogant-while-ignorant asshattery, would have the intelligence to realize they have nothing to contribute but how little they know and how much of an asshole they are, and shut up.

Fetch me a new irony meter, this one has just broken.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 8:54 am UTC
by Dontget
BAReFOOt wrote:What kind of stupid ad hominem argument is that? Has Randall become a stereotypical know-nothing white knight pro-sexism nerd now?

It seems he never actually talked to women. Nor does he understand female psychology. Instead it seems he got his infos from sexist magazines that cater to insecure women.

I talked to and consulted women all my adult life. And if you ask them, especially young women, what they want, by far the most will first say things like “I don’t know”, something very vague, or something they read somewhere that they’re supposed to want. And men are not much better nowadays, just so you know. They just never think about it (because that’s not “spontaneous”… another stupid meme the magazines put into people’s heads) or just plain don’t care. (“Not giving a fuck” has become a meme too, even though it’s literally half the definition of stupidity.)

But what women have in addition, is that they are more empathic and more susceptible to peer pressure (see: slut shaming [mostly done by women]). This, among more sensible intentions, causes them to hide their true intentions. Since if they openly blurted out that they just want to bang and fall in love madly and everything, a billion men would descend upon them, to spam them with requests… And a billion women and many men would call them “slut” because they think they have to, because they think that’s the group consensus, and because of jealousy.

Thirdly, if you ask any experienced woman (30+), she will tell you over and over again of the old dilemma: Nice family men are boring. And interesting adventure men are unfaithful. Somehow those two are mutually exclusive.
And, this has been studied, it actually is mutually exclusive. The former is a low level of testosterone. The latter a high level. Obviously you can’t have both at the same time.
But, an this is my point: Women normally say they want the former, but always go with the latter, hoping they can somehow “change” him.
It’s only when they become so old that they have given up, or when they boyfriend becomes the former during the relationship out of natural causes, that they take the former. Which will slowly start at 30–35 years.

What exactly about any of that is supposed to be “bad”? Anyone in that situation who is empathic and can become pregnant would react that way. Hell, I react that way in those situations!

So yes; yes indeed; women say they want one thing, but really want (and go for) another thing. So what??

It’s only you, Randall, and those magazine writers’ sexist minds, where such a statement becomes “belittlement”, implying that such a behavior somehow makes women “inferior”. Instead of just part of what it means to be a woman. The sad part is that you don’t realize that and call other people sexist for not being sexist! YOU think if it doesn’t work like men work, it must be inferior. And you should be ashamed of yourselves!


Heheh. It's funny that you went through all the effort and typed all this up when you missed the point of the comic. He isn't saying anything about women. He's saying men who don't respect women's decision to not date them, and instead turn around and say there is some inherent flaw in the female psychology, are douchebags, and it probably contributes to their difficulty with women. It helps if you're aware that the responder, in this situation, is being completely sarcastic the entire time.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 8:59 am UTC
by blob
Women (and men) don't want guys (or girls) they've rejected. That's kind of tautological.

So how you respond to rejection may affect whether you remain/become friends, but it's unlikely to change the fact that you've already been rejected.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:16 am UTC
by KarenRei
Let's keep it simple.

In almost any sentence where people say "Women (verb)..." or "Men (verb)..." and it's about something psychological (as opposed to, say, something involving reproductive organs or a statistical difference in strength / height or the like), 99% of the time it's equally accurate to simply say "People (verb)..." The popular perception of differences between genders (including the effects of both brain structure and hormones) is often vastly different from the statistical reality. Screw Mars and Venus; men and women are from Earth. Psychologically, we're statistically virtually identical in most measures. And in many cases where there are differences that even manage to meet statistical significance, what differences there are may well be artifacts of culture.

https://www.rochester.edu/news/show.php?id=5382

Remember that your partner is an individual who has thoughts and feelings just like yours. They are not their gender. Remember that gay couples have the exact same sort of relationship problems as straight ones.

And if you still have trouble viewing the other gender as being of the same stock as you... men, look at your scrotum. See the line down the middle? That's where your labia fused before you were born. Women, look at your clitoris. That would have been your penis.

We're all made of the same stuff.

One closing graph:

Image

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:30 am UTC
by blob
KarenRei wrote:Psychologically, we're statistically virtually identical in most measures.

Well, since most people are straight, we can say right off the bat that most men are attracted only to women, and most women are attracted only to men - so as far as the psychology of attraction goes, gender differences wouldn't be that surprising.

The OkCupid blog, for example, suggests that men find photos of women smiling at them most attractive, while women find photos of men looking away from the camera and not smiling most attractive.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:44 am UTC
by Alltat
Women do like nice guys, it's just that thinking of yourself as "nice" is not the same as actually being nice. If you're only kind to someone because of their gender, you're just as bad as the "assholes" and a lot less honest about it.

poxic wrote:What women really want is ice cream. I assume this is true because I am a woman and I wish I had some ice cream right now.

That's a cheat answer. Everyone wants ice cream. Some people are reluctant to accept the consequences of eating it, but they still want the ice cream.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 10:18 am UTC
by Harry Voyager
Of course then there is the faction that calls a pox on both your houses, but in this case it's redundant, doubly.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 10:24 am UTC
by orthogon
Alltat wrote:Women do like nice guys, it's just that thinking of yourself as "nice" is not the same as actually being nice. If you're only kind to someone because of their gender, you're just as bad as the "assholes" and a lot less honest about it.

poxic wrote:What women really want is ice cream. I assume this is true because I am a woman and I wish I had some ice cream right now.

That's a cheat answer. Everyone wants ice cream. Some people are reluctant to accept the consequences of eating it, but they still want the ice cream.

Not so. I've never been a massive fan of ice cream. I mean, on a hot day I might have one, but I can take it or leave it. If ice cream were banned tomorrow, I wouldn't really be bothered.

As for the combination of jelly (=jello?) and ice cream, which was a staple of children's birthday parties and which other kids seemed to go crazy over, I never really got that at all. I mean, the texture combination is unpleasant, the tastes don't really go together, and the temperature differential between the two components tops off the whole negative experience.

For reference, I have a penis.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 10:32 am UTC
by The Mighty Thesaurus
orthogon wrote:For reference, I have a penis.

No, you don't. You don't have anything: you are a bug in the forum software, the most obvious manifestation being this random series of characters that, by an astonishing coincidence, happens to resemble well-formed written English.

Everyone wants ice cream.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 10:43 am UTC
by quenlinlom
The funny thing is how Randall felt the need at all to address the pick-up artist movement.

They are such an insignificant minority. Just ignore them and they'll vanish. That there's a need at all to write such a passive-aggressive comic against these buffoons shows quite some insecurities going around here. :wink:

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 11:07 am UTC
by Mutex
KarenRei wrote:men, look at your scrotum. See the line down the middle?


Thanks for getting me into trouble at work.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 11:24 am UTC
by KarenRei
blob wrote:
KarenRei wrote:Psychologically, we're statistically virtually identical in most measures.

Well, since most people are straight, we can say right off the bat that most men are attracted only to women, and most women are attracted only to men


You do know the meaning of the word "most", right? Sexuality is one of those rare psychological measures that's not virtually identical between the sexes.

As for rating photos, you're free to conduct your own study to determine whether that's a consequence of sexuality, an inherent gender trait, or whether that's simply influenced by environmental/social factors of the participants of that website. For example, do the Masai express the same preference? What about the Aleut peoples? Tibetians? What people find attractive even varies over time within a *single* culture. In Europe, for example, most countries went through a phase where heavy women were seen as attractive in the rennaisance, skinny but curvy women attractive in the victorian era, skinny and non-curvy in the 20s, and on and on. We're just talking about European cultural changes. Do you find neck rings attractive?

Image

Because Kayan guys sure do!

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 11:30 am UTC
by Klear
KarenRei wrote:
blob wrote:
KarenRei wrote:Psychologically, we're statistically virtually identical in most measures.

Well, since most people are straight, we can say right off the bat that most men are attracted only to women, and most women are attracted only to men


You do know the meaning of the word "most", right? Sexuality is one of those rare psychological measures that's not virtually identical between the sexes.


...and, of course, it depends on whether you chose to formulate it as "are attracted to men/women" or "are attracted to the opposite sex".

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 11:33 am UTC
by BlitzGirl
Something about shoes and ice cream?
Spoiler:
Image

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 11:50 am UTC
by JustDoug
Kit. wrote:Are you the guy on the left?


Nah. On the right. He's got a strange sense of humor that doesxn't always translate to online posts well .

Mind you, I did live in that other guy's neghborhood in the long ago past, though.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 11:51 am UTC
by Plutarch
I have some sympathy for the first speaker, if he's young. There are plenty of young men (including me in the past) who simply have no idea how to find a girlfriend or lover, just because they lack experience of the world. So they end up being as nice as they can to the girl they like, and then become distressed when she disappears over the horizon with the bad guy on the motorbike. Which then leads to them saying stuff like 'Women say they want nice guys etc.' But it's much too harsh to then condemn that young man as someone who's 'belittling a woman's judgement and self-awareness.' He's just fed up because he can't find a girlfriend, and the only behaviour he can think of to rectify the situation, which is to be as friendly as he can, doesn't seem to be working.

I do understand the 'friend zone criticism,' that is to say, just because you've become really friendly with a woman doesn't mean she has any obligation to start dating you. That's obviously true, but it's not as if most young men who end up in that situation have cunningly planned it out in some sinister fashion beforehand. Quite the opposite - they're just blundering along being as nice as possible to the girl they like because they have no idea what else to do.

If I was a third character in the cartoon, I'd tell the smug second character they're not helping anyone with their sarcasm, and I'd try offering a sympathetic ear instead to the first guy, and maybe some helpful advice. For instance, how I solved all my relationship problems by retreating into alcohol and my Playstation, and have never looked back.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 12:23 pm UTC
by The Mighty Thesaurus
Plutarch wrote:If I was a third character in the cartoon, I'd tell the smug second character they're not helping anyone with their sarcasm

Women. They're helping women.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 12:44 pm UTC
by Estranged2
Is Karl Sagan a bitter reject?

Because it's in his books that I learned that female animals are attracted to status and power, while male animals go for quantity and youth. It's not a mystery why that is - females are the ones that get vulnerable during pregnancy, so they have to be more selective if they want to be protected and provided for. Both the male and the female heuristics can lead to errors; this doesn't have much to do with our "judgement and self-awareness" - we're all, male and female alike, puppets on a DNA string. And I don't mean we don't have our reasoning, but given the fact that women are the ones that carry the burden of pregnancy, we'd arrive at the same sexual priorities and the same rules of sexual attraction even if we had no instincts at all.
Nerd relationships go slightly differently and may obfuscate these principles, but they are still there doing their work.

And while we're here, we can also remember his strip "Negging" (I can't link it because it's considered spam, but it's strip # 1027).
It was very inaccurate - a real mockery of pickup culture that doesn't have much to do with what it is all about. Pickup art is not about being rude, inconsiderate and obnoxious. It's about building and displaying confidence in a very subtle way and creating emotional rapport that cannot be achieved (and is actually ruined) with a strictly rational, wordy approach. There is a very short essay, written by a woman, called "The Kino Process". A quick glance at it may enhance Randall Munroe's understanding of pickup art beyond the caricature of it that he has drawn. (This essay allowed me to start a relationship with my first girlfriend).

I wanted to send him a mail about this, but I suppose he's not to be bothered - his contact info states that if I have a comment about a strip I'd rather post it here, so I registered for the forum.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 1:06 pm UTC
by orthogon
The Mighty Thesaurus wrote:
orthogon wrote:For reference, I have a penis.

No, you don't. You don't have anything: you are a bug in the forum software, the most obvious manifestation being this random series of characters that, by an astonishing coincidence, happens to resemble well-formed written English.

Everyone wants ice cream.

Damn, I failed the Turing test despite actually being human.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 1:16 pm UTC
by markfiend
The stupid is strong in this thread.
BAReFOOt wrote:white knight

The very fact that you use this phrase betrays you, and is quite frankly insulting to those of us who don't buy into the PUA/MRA mythology.
BAReFOOt wrote:if you ask them, especially young women, what they want, by far the most will first say things like “I don’t know”

Maybe because she doesn't want to explain herself to this obnoxious arsehole who won't stop asking her what she wants out of life. And she's too polite to tell you to fuck off.
BAReFOOt wrote:they are more empathic and more susceptible to peer pressure

Bullshit broad-brush generalisation.
BAReFOOt wrote:Nice family men are boring. And interesting adventure men are unfaithful. Somehow those two are mutually exclusive.
And, this has been studied, it actually is mutually exclusive.

Link to the peer-reviewed papers in which it has been studied please. Otherwise what can be claimed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
BAReFOOt wrote:Women normally say they want the former, but always go with the latter, hoping they can somehow “change” him.

"always". Uh-huh. You realise you're completely discounting the existence of women who aren't heterosexual here?
BAReFOOt wrote:can become pregnant

Oh. So she's only a woman if she can become pregnant. Nice. So if she's had the menopause, she's not a woman. Had chemotherapy rendering her sterile? Not a woman. Trans* women? Do I really need to ask?

You don't even see -- indeed you actively deny! -- that this attitude betrays a profound contempt for women... and you have the gall to accuse Randall of sexism.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 1:17 pm UTC
by Invertin
My favorite part of the 'friendzone' reaction is the fact that they get angry at the girl for going off with the 'badboy' instead of angry at the badboy for inevitably breaking her heart, or sad for the girl who is in a relationship that isn't for her. By getting angry at the girl instead of the actual negative element according to your own definition of the event, you are proving that you didn't care about her in the first place, it was all about you getting a girlfriend.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 1:26 pm UTC
by HokieNerd
Dontget wrote:
BAReFOOt wrote:What kind of stupid ad hominem argument is that? Has Randall become a stereotypical know-nothing white knight pro-sexism nerd now?

Edit: TLDQ


Heheh. It's funny that you went through all the effort and typed all this up when you missed the point of the comic. He isn't saying anything about women. He's saying men who don't respect women's decision to not date them, and instead turn around and say there is some inherent flaw in the female psychology, are douchebags, and it probably contributes to their difficulty with women. It helps if you're aware that the responder, in this situation, is being completely sarcastic the entire time.


Well, Randall really dropped the ball, then, in not using a SarcMark™.

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 1:36 pm UTC
by cellocgw
da Doctah wrote:What women want is shoes. Lots and lots of shoes. Their own shoes and shoes for other people.

I have tested this time and time again, and the results always confirm the hypothesis.


This.

Plus, It's not about the nail

Re: 1325: "Rejection"

Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 1:40 pm UTC
by cellocgw
BlitzGirl wrote:Something about shoes and ice cream?
Spoiler:
Image


Somehow I just knew I could count on you , BG! Please not to send picture to my spousal unit: she's got enough shoes already. <-- by my count, of course. By her count, just getting started :oops: