Arguing with moderation in a thread is a pretty good way to get banned around here. But shit-slinging at moderators at the same time? That should be universally understood to end poorly for the shit-slinger.
Dear Readers: There is now extremely limited purpose in arguing with this poster.
What kind of stupid ad hominem argument is that
? Has Randall become a stereotypical know-nothing white knight pro-sexism nerd now?
It seems he never actually talked
to women. Nor does he understand female psychology. Instead it seems he got his infos from sexist magazines that cater to insecure women.
I talked to and consulted women all my adult life. And if you ask them, especially young women, what they want, by far the most will first say things like “I don’t know”, something very vague, or something they read somewhere that they’re supposed to want. And men are not much better nowadays, just so you know. They just never think about it (because that’s not “spontaneous”… another stupid meme the magazines put into people’s heads) or just plain don’t care. (“Not giving a fuck” has become a meme too, even though it’s literally
half the definition of stupidity.)
But what women have in addition, is that they are more empathic and more susceptible to peer pressure (see: slut shaming [mostly done by women]). This, among more sensible intentions, causes them to hide their true intentions. Since if they openly blurted out that they just want to bang and fall in love madly and everything, a billion men would descend upon them, to spam them with requests… And a billion women and many men would call them “slut” because they think they have to, because they think that’s the group consensus, and because of jealousy.
Thirdly, if you ask any experienced woman (30+), she will tell you over and over again of the old dilemma: Nice family men are boring. And interesting adventure men are unfaithful. Somehow those two are mutually exclusive.
And, this has been studied, it actually is
mutually exclusive. The former is a low level of testosterone. The latter a high level. Obviously
you can’t have both at the same time.
But, an this is my point: Women normally say they want the former, but always
go with the latter, hoping they can somehow “change” him.
It’s only when they become so old that they have given up, or when they boyfriend becomes
the former during the relationship out of natural causes, that they take the former. Which will slowly start at 30–35 years.
What exactly about any of that is supposed to be “bad”? Anyone in that situation who is empathic and can become pregnant would react that way. Hell, I
react that way in those situations!
So yes; yes indeed; women say
they want one thing, but really want (and go for) another
thing. So what??
It’s only you, Randall, and those magazine writers’ sexist minds, where such a statement becomes “belittlement”, implying
that such a behavior somehow makes women “inferior”. Instead of just part of what it means to be a woman. The sad part is that you don’t realize that and call other people sexist for not being sexist
! YOU think if it doesn’t work like men work, it must be inferior. And you should be ashamed of yourselves!————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
JustDoug wrote:You're probably one of those that outwardly goes on about low-fat vanilla being your favorite, but secretly buy rich calorie-bomb chocolate extravaganzas, thinking that you can burn off the extra 4,200 calories later with a brisk walk. […] You face nothing but heartbreak. Why not settle down on the couch with a nice reduced fat yogurt and save yourself the pain?
Have you been living behind the moon? You know that low-fat variants are less
healthy, and make you even fatter, right? Please tell me you don’t still think fat makes people fat!
Because then I got some surprises for you:
In short words: Sugar & starch cause inflammation and growth of wrong bacteria not only in your mouth (where you brush your teeth against it), but in your entire digestive system. And THAT causes you to become fat from fat… and from everything else!
And no, calories do not matter AT ALL. If you have a healthy flora and don’t eat those dense carbs, you simply stop getting hungry before you can get fat, and because of the slow burn compared to carbs it will just take longer to be digested. That’s all. I’m living proof of that.
JustDoug wrote:Yeah, but what flavor?
Always the one you know the least. Keeps life interesting. And hence by definition gives you a longer life in retrospect. ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
CorruptUser wrote:Oh dear. Randall insulted the "friendzoners" again. EVERYONE, BATTLESTATIONS! Be on the lookout for rehashed MRA talking points and trilbies!
I wish people like you, who have nothing to contribute but arrogant-while-ignorant asshattery, would have the intelligence to realize they have nothing to contribute but how little they know and how much of an asshole they are, and shut up.No triple posting, there's a notification of all the people ninja'ing you and an edit button, so use them