British Snap Election - Theresa, Meh; Corbyn near-win; So long, Farron, auf wiedersehen goodbyeee

Seen something interesting in the news or on the intertubes? Discuss it here.

Moderators: Zamfir, Hawknc, Moderators General, Prelates

Regardless of all other practicalities, I will (or would if I could) mostly be voting...

Poll ended at Fri Jun 09, 2017 8:48 am UTC

...for the local candidate I like best.
1
6%
...against the local candidate I like least.
0
No votes
...for the party I think best shares my core not-Brexit views.
8
44%
...against the party I think does not share my core not-Brexit views.
4
22%
...for the leader I think deserves to be PM.
2
11%
...against the leader who should not be PM.
1
6%
...to align with a type-of-Brexit/no-Brexit view.
0
No votes
...to spoil a type-of-Brexit/no-Brexit view.
0
No votes
...regarding IndyRef2/more localised issue..
0
No votes
...pointedly withholding/spoiling my vote.
0
No votes
...not at all (apathy, etc)
2
11%
...with a completely different strategy in mind.
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 18

User avatar
charliepanayi
Posts: 1519
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 7:26 pm UTC
Location: London, UK

Re: British Snap Election - not a re-referendum?

Postby charliepanayi » Sat Jun 10, 2017 8:57 pm UTC

[quote="Jumble"
Speaking as a Labour supporter my whole life, before we crack open the champagne, we need to figure out how to win. Happy to accept that may need to be led by Corbyn, but in case anyone missed it, we came second. No prize for second place.[/quote]

Until 10pm on Thursday, pretty much everyone thought the Tories were going to have a majority of anything from 50 to over 100. When the election was called a majority of 150 was even being suggested. So give people a few days to be happy that Labour have made some real progress from 2015. You want to figure out how to win? This election campaign just provided the blueprint!
"Excuse me Miss, do you like pineapple?"

"I don't want to achieve immortality through my work, I want to achieve it through not dying"

User avatar
Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 2486
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

Re: British Snap Election - not a re-referendum?

Postby Soupspoon » Sat Jun 10, 2017 9:06 pm UTC

Redprint. ;)

elasto
Posts: 3107
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 1:53 am UTC

Re: British Snap Election - not a re-referendum?

Postby elasto » Sat Jun 10, 2017 9:52 pm UTC

Mutex wrote:Other than looking at past turnout? Possibly not...

That seems like a fatal flaw if so; It would make polling entirely pointless. You should be able to ask 'how likely are you to vote?' and predict turnout based on how many people answered yes in previous years.

Maybe a lot of people said they were not likely to vote and then changed their mind...

---

Thought this article on the bbc was cool: link

The BBC has spoken to former Tory voters in some of those lost seats to find out why they changed their minds.

David Manning, 64, has supported the Conservatives for most of his life. Living in the Plymouth Sutton and Devonport constituency, he was among the voters who helped Labour candidate Luke Pollard take the seat from Conservative Oliver Colvile - increasing Labour's share of the vote by 16.7%.

A retired teacher, he says the idea that he would have voted for Jeremy Corbyn's Labour Party was laughable at the beginning of the campaign.

"I was even ridiculing him," he told the BBC. "At the start of the campaign I was totally against Jeremy Corbyn. My switch from blue to red was a surprise even to myself. However, as the campaign progressed I warmed to him and cooled to Mrs May."

David has voted for Labour only once before, when Tony Blair was leading the party.

"Mrs May was wooden and lacked charisma," he said. "And having witnessed first hand the way education has been dismantled by the Tories, I concluded that the alternative Labour was offering was far better for the country.

"I've watched my partner's school become an academy and have the money sucked out of it. I read every manifesto and asked myself an honest question: 'What do I think is best for the country?' I believe in Labour's manifesto."

David believes there has been a shift in public opinion and he thinks that is a trend which could continue.

User avatar
eSOANEM
:D
Posts: 3600
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:39 pm UTC
Location: Grantabrycge

Re: British Snap Election - not a re-referendum?

Postby eSOANEM » Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:51 pm UTC

charliepanayi wrote:

Until 10pm on Thursday, pretty much everyone thought the Tories were going to have a majority of anything from 50 to over 100.


The yougov poll was basically the only one that had made substantial enough changes to their calculations and was the main one I was following so I was expecting a reduced majority as of two weeks or more ago and a hung parliament for all of the last week (I was also looking at the momentum within the poll and extrapolating forward which is dangerous but, eh, it seemed to work).

I think previously they'd guessed turnout by just asking people how likely they were to vote; this time they (yougov's revised model) asked a bunch of other demographic questions instead and used previous data to work out the actual probability of voting from there (or at least, a better probability than the self-reported one).
my pronouns are they

Magnanimous wrote:(fuck the macrons)

User avatar
Angua
Don't call her Delphine.
Posts: 5653
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:42 pm UTC
Location: UK/[St. Kitts and] Nevis Occasionally, I migrate to the US for a bit

Re: British Snap Election - not a re-referendum?

Postby Angua » Sun Jun 11, 2017 11:57 am UTC

'Look, sir, I know Angua. She's not the useless type. She doesn't stand there and scream helplessly. She makes other people do that.'
GNU Terry Pratchett

elasto
Posts: 3107
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 1:53 am UTC

Re: British Snap Election - not a re-referendum?

Postby elasto » Sun Jun 11, 2017 12:25 pm UTC

Wow. And from that link:

Meanwhile, the polling company which accurately predicted Friday’s dramatic election results released another poll – putting Labour five points ahead.

The Survation survey, for The Mail on Sunday, also found that 49 per cent of the public want the Prime Minister to resign, while only 38 per cent want her to remain in post.

Incredible.

May definitely looks toast, but can the Tories limp on without being forced to call a new election? I feel that Boris has the charisma to pretend to shift the Tories to the left to win a general election, but I'm not sure Rudd does.

User avatar
Xenomortis
Not actually a special flower.
Posts: 1397
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:47 am UTC

Re: British Snap Election - not a re-referendum?

Postby Xenomortis » Sun Jun 11, 2017 12:37 pm UTC

eSOANEM wrote:
charliepanayi wrote:

Until 10pm on Thursday, pretty much everyone thought the Tories were going to have a majority of anything from 50 to over 100.


The yougov poll was basically the only one that had made substantial enough changes to their calculations and was the main one I was following so I was expecting a reduced majority as of two weeks or more ago and a hung parliament for all of the last week (I was also looking at the momentum within the poll and extrapolating forward which is dangerous but, eh, it seemed to work).

I think previously they'd guessed turnout by just asking people how likely they were to vote; this time they (yougov's revised model) asked a bunch of other demographic questions instead and used previous data to work out the actual probability of voting from there (or at least, a better probability than the self-reported one).

Torture data enough and it will confess to anything.
A lot of "raw data" from the pollsters actually indicated a very close election (Conservative and Labour vote shares being similar, at most a 4-5 point Tory lead). But then they do their "adjustments", over fit the data, and report a headline that gives the Conservatives an 8 or even 12 point lead.

ICM polling report - the guys that gave a 12 point lead to the Tories wrote:

Code: Select all

Table 3
QB. The Conservatives, Labour, the Liberal Democrats, UKIP and other parties will fight the General Election in your area on June 8th.
Which party will you vote for in the General Election on Thursday?
Base: All respondents

Unweighted:
 Con: 525
 Lab: 505

Weighted:
 Con: 551
 Lab: 476


They allocated 2015 votes to some of those who indicated "unlikely to vote" (eh...), but then also added "refuse to vote" according to the same proportions (stop outguessing your respondents), and then artificially boosted the Conservative gain from that mechanism by 20% (wait, what!?).

elasto wrote:May definitely looks toast, but can the Tories limp on without being forced to call a new election? I feel that Boris has the charisma to pretend to shift the Tories to the left to win a general election, but I'm not sure Rudd does.

I don't think there's actually anything stopping them. Short of a leadership challenge, it's hard to imagine the remaining parties grouping up sufficiently well to topple May.
Conservative rebels will be a problem and associations with the DUP may concern the more moderate members.


There's a lot of emphasis on "the youth vote" on TV - I would personally be shocked if the turnout rate for the 18-25 group was above 50%.
That'd it be overwhelmingly pro-Labour would not surprise me, given the staggering amount of anti-Tory rhetoric my Facebook feed was filled with the past few weeks, and the collapse of Lib-Dem support in 2015.
Image

User avatar
Liri
Healthy non-floating pooper reporting for doodie.
Posts: 927
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 8:11 pm UTC
Contact:

Re: British Snap Election - not a re-referendum?

Postby Liri » Sun Jun 11, 2017 12:56 pm UTC

Nate Silver had an article a few days ago about the issues with British polling. The main gist was about multiple layers of overcorrection and still trying to account for prior elections.
He wondered could you eat the mushrooms, would you die, do you care.

elasto
Posts: 3107
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 1:53 am UTC

Re: British Snap Election - not a re-referendum?

Postby elasto » Sun Jun 11, 2017 6:25 pm UTC

Xenomortis wrote:Torture data enough and it will confess to anything.
A lot of "raw data" from the pollsters actually indicated a very close election (Conservative and Labour vote shares being similar, at most a 4-5 point Tory lead). But then they do their "adjustments", over fit the data, and report a headline that gives the Conservatives an 8 or even 12 point lead.

The problem is they have to do adjustments because people routinely lie to pollsters as a form of virtue signalling.

Traditionally more people vote Tory than say they will because the Tories are seen as 'the nasty party' even by many of their supporters, so voting Tory is something of 'a secret shame'.

It's possible that, this time around, voting Tory and voting for Corbyn were in some way equally 'shameful', so the raw data fitted the actual votes rather better than expected.

It's a tricky art to be sure, but, still, I'm surprised so many of them got it so badly wrong.

User avatar
Xenomortis
Not actually a special flower.
Posts: 1397
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:47 am UTC

Re: British Snap Election - not a re-referendum?

Postby Xenomortis » Sun Jun 11, 2017 6:39 pm UTC

You're referring to the "Shy Tory factor".

It is true that the Conservatives have beaten the polls more often than Labour (by about 2:1?), but I suspect the "shy Tory" effect is overstated.
I would have to look back at the various polls before previous elections to really argue further though, and I am no statistician.
Image

User avatar
Angua
Don't call her Delphine.
Posts: 5653
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:42 pm UTC
Location: UK/[St. Kitts and] Nevis Occasionally, I migrate to the US for a bit

Re: British Snap Election - not a re-referendum?

Postby Angua » Sun Jun 11, 2017 8:07 pm UTC

Given that apparently Jeremy *unt is still Health Secretary and both the BBC and Sky have mispronounced his name, I thought I'd take the moment to share this for our non-British friends who didn't get it ;)
'Look, sir, I know Angua. She's not the useless type. She doesn't stand there and scream helplessly. She makes other people do that.'
GNU Terry Pratchett

Mutex
Posts: 1043
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:32 pm UTC

Re: British Snap Election - not a re-referendum?

Postby Mutex » Sun Jun 11, 2017 8:33 pm UTC

Didn't realise that had happened so many times, the first one (full length clip) is legendary though (I love the strained sound of his voice when he tries continuing like nothing happened).

RCT Bob
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 2:05 pm UTC
Location: Netherlands

Re: British Snap Election - not a re-referendum?

Postby RCT Bob » Sun Jun 11, 2017 10:31 pm UTC

elasto wrote:
Xenomortis wrote:Torture data enough and it will confess to anything.
A lot of "raw data" from the pollsters actually indicated a very close election (Conservative and Labour vote shares being similar, at most a 4-5 point Tory lead). But then they do their "adjustments", over fit the data, and report a headline that gives the Conservatives an 8 or even 12 point lead.

The problem is they have to do adjustments because people routinely lie to pollsters as a form of virtue signalling.

Traditionally more people vote Tory than say they will because the Tories are seen as 'the nasty party' even by many of their supporters, so voting Tory is something of 'a secret shame'.

It's possible that, this time around, voting Tory and voting for Corbyn were in some way equally 'shameful', so the raw data fitted the actual votes rather better than expected.

It's a tricky art to be sure, but, still, I'm surprised so many of them got it so badly wrong.


As far as I know polls are generally also off quite a bit because the group of people that fills them in tends to be unrepresentative of the overall voting population. It is surprisingly hard to get a very representative sample size to poll from. In the Netherlands you often see an opposite effect. The Party for Freedom, which is basically the Dutch anti-muslim, anti-immigration, anti-EU party, tends to be over-represented in the polls, in some more than others. Some polled them at 25 seats for our last election and they ended up with 20. It's difficult to explain why, some say that a large portion of the people thinking favourably about them simply doesn't show up to vote, others say that people say they want to vote Party for Freedom to the polls to give a signal to the government that they're dissatisfied, although when it comes down to vote they don't actually believe that the Party for Freedom is actually a viable alternative. There are some other biases for the polls, and over the courses of several elections the people making those polls tend to adjust their results from past experience. It's always off a bit because the bias tends to change significantly from election to election and the adjustment is only made based on how 'off' they were in previous elections.

User avatar
Liri
Healthy non-floating pooper reporting for doodie.
Posts: 927
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 8:11 pm UTC
Contact:

Re: British Snap Election - not a re-referendum?

Postby Liri » Sun Jun 11, 2017 11:21 pm UTC

They weren't actually that far off in many cases, polling firms just beat the data to death trying to get the result they wanted. The miss (4% on average) was totally in-line with the past 70 years of election data.

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/emergency-politics-podcast-the-u-k-election/
He wondered could you eat the mushrooms, would you die, do you care.

User avatar
Angua
Don't call her Delphine.
Posts: 5653
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:42 pm UTC
Location: UK/[St. Kitts and] Nevis Occasionally, I migrate to the US for a bit

Re: British Snap Election - Meh result

Postby Angua » Mon Jun 12, 2017 12:48 pm UTC

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-40243782

Queen speech delayed partly because the goatskin parchment ink won't dry in time.
'Look, sir, I know Angua. She's not the useless type. She doesn't stand there and scream helplessly. She makes other people do that.'
GNU Terry Pratchett

Mutex
Posts: 1043
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:32 pm UTC

Re: British Snap Election - Meh result

Postby Mutex » Mon Jun 12, 2017 12:58 pm UTC

If they used normal paper it would be dry pretty much as soon as it came out of the laser printer.

User avatar
Grop
Posts: 1849
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:36 am UTC
Location: France

Re: British Snap Election - Meh result

Postby Grop » Mon Jun 12, 2017 1:22 pm UTC

And I thought everyone was vegan in the UK. Can they really use goat's skin?

Mutex
Posts: 1043
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:32 pm UTC

Re: British Snap Election - Meh result

Postby Mutex » Mon Jun 12, 2017 1:25 pm UTC

Grop wrote:And I thought everyone was vegan in the UK.

Is this a genuine stereotype?

User avatar
Grop
Posts: 1849
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:36 am UTC
Location: France

Re: British Snap Election - Meh result

Postby Grop » Mon Jun 12, 2017 1:48 pm UTC

No it isn't, I just made it up. I suspect a larger number of Brits are vegetarian (not necessarily vegan) than the French for instance, and that animal rights are more serious as well. But I don't think this is a well set stereotype.

Mutex
Posts: 1043
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:32 pm UTC

Re: British Snap Election - Meh result

Postby Mutex » Mon Jun 12, 2017 1:51 pm UTC

Ah ok, yeah that matches my general impression too.

User avatar
SlyReaper
inflatable
Posts: 8015
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:09 pm UTC
Location: Bristol, Old Blighty

Re: British Snap Election - not a re-referendum?

Postby SlyReaper » Mon Jun 12, 2017 5:48 pm UTC

charliepanayi wrote:
Jumble wrote:Speaking as a Labour supporter my whole life, before we crack open the champagne, we need to figure out how to win. Happy to accept that may need to be led by Corbyn, but in case anyone missed it, we came second. No prize for second place.


Until 10pm on Thursday, pretty much everyone thought the Tories were going to have a majority of anything from 50 to over 100. When the election was called a majority of 150 was even being suggested. So give people a few days to be happy that Labour have made some real progress from 2015. You want to figure out how to win? This election campaign just provided the blueprint!

That's... optimistic. Labour were up against the worst Tory manifesto anyone has ever seen, against a Tory leader with zero charisma. Under normal circumstances, they would have absolutely crushed it. That they not only failed to crush it, but failed to get even close to first place, I see as a somewhat damning indictment of Corbyn's policies. The only reason they did better than expected is because the Tory manifesto was an unexpected act of hubris, and people love punishing hubris.
Image
What would Baron Harkonnen do?

User avatar
charliepanayi
Posts: 1519
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 7:26 pm UTC
Location: London, UK

Re: British Snap Election - not a re-referendum?

Postby charliepanayi » Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:41 pm UTC

SlyReaper wrote:
charliepanayi wrote:
Jumble wrote:Speaking as a Labour supporter my whole life, before we crack open the champagne, we need to figure out how to win. Happy to accept that may need to be led by Corbyn, but in case anyone missed it, we came second. No prize for second place.


Until 10pm on Thursday, pretty much everyone thought the Tories were going to have a majority of anything from 50 to over 100. When the election was called a majority of 150 was even being suggested. So give people a few days to be happy that Labour have made some real progress from 2015. You want to figure out how to win? This election campaign just provided the blueprint!

That's... optimistic. Labour were up against the worst Tory manifesto anyone has ever seen, against a Tory leader with zero charisma. Under normal circumstances, they would have absolutely crushed it. That they not only failed to crush it, but failed to get even close to first place, I see as a somewhat damning indictment of Corbyn's policies. The only reason they did better than expected is because the Tory manifesto was an unexpected act of hubris, and people love punishing hubris.


You do realise this election was only called because the Tories expected to win a big majority, right? Until 9:59pm on Thursday evening, nearly everyone expected that outcome. To say 'actually it was still bad for Labour' is ludicrous. They boosted their vote share by 10%. They're now in a position when they could actually win next time, and that next time might be sooner rather than later. I mean, nowhere near first place? There's almost 30 seats where the Tory majority is down to under 2,000 now:

https://twitter.com/AdamBienkov/status/ ... 0545239040

And where is the alternative Tory leader with charisma? All the other options seem to be even less popular than May.
"Excuse me Miss, do you like pineapple?"

"I don't want to achieve immortality through my work, I want to achieve it through not dying"

User avatar
SlyReaper
inflatable
Posts: 8015
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:09 pm UTC
Location: Bristol, Old Blighty

Re: British Snap Election - Meh result

Postby SlyReaper » Mon Jun 12, 2017 8:05 pm UTC

BoJo and Moggy. Two names off the top of my head who have a modicum of charisma.

The Tories expected a big majority at the start. That was because they had yet to reveal their utterly cancerous manifesto. If they had just shut up and stuck to platitudes like "Brexit means Brexit", and kept their manifesto relatively anodyne, they would certainly have increased their majority at Labour's expense. Then May released her manifesto, and the Tory lead dwindled to almost nothing. That was what did it. It wasn't a sudden upswell of support for socialism, it was people punishing May for that abortion of a manifesto.

You keep saying that a big Tory majority was expected right up until the exit polls came out, but that's not true at all. There was a YouGov poll the previous week showing the Tories ending up with 310 seats, and most of the people I talked to and listened to seemed to think that was a fairly good prediction.
Image
What would Baron Harkonnen do?

elasto
Posts: 3107
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 1:53 am UTC

Re: British Snap Election - Meh result

Postby elasto » Mon Jun 12, 2017 8:19 pm UTC

SlyReaper wrote:The Tories expected a big majority at the start. That was because they had yet to reveal their utterly cancerous manifesto. If they had just shut up and stuck to platitudes like "Brexit means Brexit", and kept their manifesto relatively anodyne, they would certainly have increased their majority at Labour's expense. Then May released her manifesto, and the Tory lead dwindled to almost nothing. That was what did it. It wasn't a sudden upswell of support for socialism, it was people punishing May for that abortion of a manifesto.

I don't think that's fair either. The voting turnout was the highest in 25 years. If Corbyn's socialism was unpopular and May's 'cancerous manifesto' was too, you'd expect the exact opposite.

Comparing with 2015, for example, Cameron got 11.3m and Miliband got 9.3m - whereas this year May got 13.7m and Corbyn got 12.9m

That hardly suggests May's manifesto was viewed as 'cancerous' - and with Corbyn getting a third more votes than Miliband it's hard to paint it as anything but an upswell of support for 'socialism*'



*Socialism meaning no more tax rises on the poor and middle classes, and more investment in schools, hospitals and the police - horror of horrors...! Even the IMF recently admitted that austerity is self-defeating when trying to reduce a deficit - instead you need government investment to grow your way out of it...
Last edited by elasto on Mon Jun 12, 2017 9:06 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
charliepanayi
Posts: 1519
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 7:26 pm UTC
Location: London, UK

Re: British Snap Election - Meh result

Postby charliepanayi » Mon Jun 12, 2017 8:55 pm UTC

SlyReaper wrote:BoJo and Moggy. Two names off the top of my head who have a modicum of charisma.

The Tories expected a big majority at the start. That was because they had yet to reveal their utterly cancerous manifesto. If they had just shut up and stuck to platitudes like "Brexit means Brexit", and kept their manifesto relatively anodyne, they would certainly have increased their majority at Labour's expense. Then May released her manifesto, and the Tory lead dwindled to almost nothing. That was what did it. It wasn't a sudden upswell of support for socialism, it was people punishing May for that abortion of a manifesto.

You keep saying that a big Tory majority was expected right up until the exit polls came out, but that's not true at all. There was a YouGov poll the previous week showing the Tories ending up with 310 seats, and most of the people I talked to and listened to seemed to think that was a fairly good prediction.


Boris Johnson? Jacob Rees-Mogg? Things really are bad for the Tories if those are their best options. Does anyone outside of Westminster even know who Rees-Mogg is?

And that YouGov poll was very much the exception. The general consensus in the media and among the other polls (the Survation one apart) was a Tory majority of at least 40 and possible as high as 100. Even YouGov didn't quite trust their experimental poll, they put out a different one giving the Tories a 7 point lead as well.
"Excuse me Miss, do you like pineapple?"

"I don't want to achieve immortality through my work, I want to achieve it through not dying"

Mutex
Posts: 1043
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:32 pm UTC

Re: British Snap Election - Meh result

Postby Mutex » Mon Jun 12, 2017 9:39 pm UTC

Holy fuck I missed that... Jacob Rees-Mogg, charisma?!

I have cleaning utensils with more charisma.

User avatar
SlyReaper
inflatable
Posts: 8015
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:09 pm UTC
Location: Bristol, Old Blighty

Re: British Snap Election - Meh result

Postby SlyReaper » Mon Jun 12, 2017 9:52 pm UTC

Well, I know who Rees-Mogg is, and I live in Bristol. So... yes? By the same token, who had heard of Corbyn before he entered the Labour leadership contest?

I don't accept that high turnout means the manifestos were popular, at least not in this case. I think you're underestimating just how terrible the Tory one was. Attacking the elderly through the dementia tax, censoring the internet, attacking human rights. I don't know anyone who was in favour of these things. Fox hunting! A cause the common man can really get behind! People didn't vote for those policies, they voted Tory because they thought Corbyn would fuck up the Brexit negotiations, which is kind of a big deal at the moment. Labour's manifesto, I think was polarising. People either thought it was the best thing ever, or that it was going to be an economic disaster. In particular, it was the young voters they managed to get on their side. It wasn't enough, because there are still a lot of older people who lived through the 70s and don't want to repeat it.
Image
What would Baron Harkonnen do?

User avatar
orthogon
Posts: 2696
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 7:52 am UTC
Location: The Airy 1830 ellipsoid

Re: British Snap Election - Meh result

Postby orthogon » Tue Jun 13, 2017 2:41 pm UTC

Delayed reaction to Angua's topic change: should we start referring to the Prime Minister as Theresa Meh?
xtifr wrote:... and orthogon merely sounds undecided.

User avatar
Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 2486
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

Re: British Snap Election - Meh result

Postby Soupspoon » Tue Jun 13, 2017 3:40 pm UTC

orthogon wrote:Delayed reaction to Angua's topic change: should we start referring to the Prime Minister as Theresa Meh?

That was me, realising I Had The Power, and possibly even the obligation, but not realising There Was A Pun To Be Made.

I have been toying with a different meme...
Spoiler:
Hang on a minute lads, I've got a great idea...
GotAnIdea.png

...but with things still ripe to resolve or fall apart, but not guaranteed either way, I was leaving it for the time being.

User avatar
Angua
Don't call her Delphine.
Posts: 5653
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:42 pm UTC
Location: UK/[St. Kitts and] Nevis Occasionally, I migrate to the US for a bit

Re: British Snap Election - Meh result

Postby Angua » Tue Jun 13, 2017 3:52 pm UTC

I was just about to say that I don't take responsibility for the thread title. It does lead to the Theresa Meh pun though.
'Look, sir, I know Angua. She's not the useless type. She doesn't stand there and scream helplessly. She makes other people do that.'
GNU Terry Pratchett

User avatar
SlyReaper
inflatable
Posts: 8015
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:09 pm UTC
Location: Bristol, Old Blighty

Re: British Snap Election - Meh result

Postby SlyReaper » Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:09 pm UTC

Theresa Mayhem is also an acceptable pun. Does anyone know yet when we can expect Strong and Stable to kick in?
Image
What would Baron Harkonnen do?

User avatar
Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 2486
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

Re: British Snap Election - Meh result

Postby Soupspoon » Tue Jun 13, 2017 5:28 pm UTC

(Strong and stable, whilst trying to get out of Europe with as much wealth as possible. In case the point needs to be laboured...)

Spoiler:
Image

:mrgreen:


And I'll change the thread title again. All credit to everyone but me, who thought of it.

User avatar
kingofdreams
Posts: 437
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 4:31 pm UTC
Location: An avatar making factory

Re: British Snap Election - Theresa, Meh; Corbyn near-win; Farron forced-it major; Scots guarded; They think Nuttall's O

Postby kingofdreams » Tue Jun 13, 2017 8:37 pm UTC

this is the self preservation society
Picard- I shall appoint you my executive officer in charge of radishes

User avatar
Jumble
Posts: 1171
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:48 am UTC
Location: London(ish), UK.
Contact:

Re: British Snap Election - Theresa, Meh; Corbyn near-win; Farron forced-it major; Scots guarded; They think Nuttall's O

Postby Jumble » Tue Jun 13, 2017 8:56 pm UTC

Please someone do a 'you're only supposed to blow the bloody doors off!' Photoshop!
Spoiler:
Giant Speck wrote:You're a demon! DEMON!!!!

Oregonaut wrote:CURSE YOU VILLAIN!!
PhoenixEnigma wrote:Jumble is either the best or worst Santa ever, and I can't figure out which. Possibly both.

User avatar
Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 2486
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

Re: British Snap Election - Theresa, Meh; Corbyn near-win; Farron forced-it major; Scots guarded; They think Nuttall's O

Postby Soupspoon » Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:40 pm UTC

Jumble wrote:Please someone do a 'you're only supposed to blow the bloody doors off!' Photoshop!

I have this GIMPed, probably needing words on it, but I only spent five minutes on it. I was going to get a better screencap...
Spoiler:
DoorsOff.jpg

(Or, even better, process an image-streammas a movie, and be slightly more consistent with the matte/transparency/overlay/underlay process, then reconstruct as animation.)

User avatar
orthogon
Posts: 2696
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 7:52 am UTC
Location: The Airy 1830 ellipsoid

Re: British Snap Election - Meh result

Postby orthogon » Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:49 pm UTC

Angua wrote:I was just about to say that I don't take responsibility for the thread title. It does lead to the Theresa Meh pun though.

Ah, apologies. You had a post with the new topic after one with the old, so I thought it was you. In fairness I should say that I didn't get much sleep last night. And not in a good way.
xtifr wrote:... and orthogon merely sounds undecided.

User avatar
Jumble
Posts: 1171
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:48 am UTC
Location: London(ish), UK.
Contact:

Re: British Snap Election - Theresa, Meh; Corbyn near-win; Farron forced-it major; Scots guarded; They think Nuttall's O

Postby Jumble » Wed Jun 14, 2017 5:05 pm UTC

Soupspoon wrote:
Jumble wrote:Please someone do a 'you're only supposed to blow the bloody doors off!' Photoshop!

I have this GIMPed, probably needing words on it, but I only spent five minutes on it. I was going to get a better screencap...
Spoiler:
DoorsOff.jpg

(Or, even better, process an image-streammas a movie, and be slightly more consistent with the matte/transparency/overlay/underlay process, then reconstruct as animation.)

Thanks! Genius!
Spoiler:
Giant Speck wrote:You're a demon! DEMON!!!!

Oregonaut wrote:CURSE YOU VILLAIN!!
PhoenixEnigma wrote:Jumble is either the best or worst Santa ever, and I can't figure out which. Possibly both.

User avatar
Angua
Don't call her Delphine.
Posts: 5653
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:42 pm UTC
Location: UK/[St. Kitts and] Nevis Occasionally, I migrate to the US for a bit

Re: British Snap Election - Theresa, Meh; Corbyn near-win; Farron forced-it major

Postby Angua » Wed Jun 14, 2017 6:25 pm UTC

Farron quits as lib-dem leader, sounds like he's too homophobic to lead?

I feel like this is something he should have realised when he took up the job.
'Look, sir, I know Angua. She's not the useless type. She doesn't stand there and scream helplessly. She makes other people do that.'
GNU Terry Pratchett

User avatar
HES
Posts: 4780
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 7:13 pm UTC
Location: England

Re: British Snap Election - Theresa, Meh; Corbyn near-win; Farron forced-it major

Postby HES » Wed Jun 14, 2017 6:44 pm UTC

When I first saw the headline I thought "surprise surprise, party leader quits after election". But his statement really is saying "you were right to call me out for being homophobic"
He/Him/His Image

User avatar
Thesh
Made to Fuck Dinosaurs
Posts: 5497
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:55 am UTC
Location: Colorado

Re: British Snap Election - Theresa, Meh; Corbyn near-win; So long, Farron, auf wiedersehen goodbyeee

Postby Thesh » Wed Jun 14, 2017 10:02 pm UTC

I took it as "Well, when I try and do what I think is actually right, in my heart, I find that I cannot follow religion and so I have decided to leave politics."
Honesty replaced by greed, they gave us the reason to fight and bleed
They try to torch our faith and hope, spit at our presence and detest our goals


Return to “News & Articles”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests