best excuse for being fat!

For the discussion of math. Duh.

Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates

mikau16
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 4:15 am UTC

best excuse for being fat!

Postby mikau16 » Fri Feb 13, 2009 2:37 am UTC

point to a slim guy and state that the two of you are topologically equivalent! one can be obtained from the other by stretching or shrinking, and you both contain the same number of holes!

User avatar
NathanielJ
Posts: 882
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:04 pm UTC

Re: best excuse for being fat!

Postby NathanielJ » Fri Feb 13, 2009 2:40 am UTC

mikau16 wrote:point to a slim guy and state that the two of you are topologically equivalent! one can be obtained from the other by stretching or shrinking, and you both contain the same number of holes!


It would be a better joke without the explanation at the end, IMO.
Homepage: http://www.njohnston.ca
Conway's Game of Life: http://www.conwaylife.com

mikau16
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 4:15 am UTC

Re: best excuse for being fat!

Postby mikau16 » Fri Feb 13, 2009 2:47 am UTC

you may be right! :]

User avatar
Pa-Patch
Posts: 124
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:16 am UTC
Location: Winnipeg, MB

Re: best excuse for being fat!

Postby Pa-Patch » Fri Feb 13, 2009 3:15 am UTC

mikau16 wrote:you may be right! :]

I just gotta say I really like your attitude.

User avatar
Incompetent
Posts: 396
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 12:08 pm UTC
Location: Brussels

Re: best excuse for being fat!

Postby Incompetent » Fri Feb 13, 2009 9:42 am UTC

mikau16 wrote:point to a slim guy and state that the two of you are topologically equivalent!


What if the slim guy has more piercings than you?

User avatar
headprogrammingczar
Posts: 3072
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 5:28 pm UTC
Location: Beaming you up

Re: best excuse for being fat!

Postby headprogrammingczar » Fri Feb 13, 2009 1:59 pm UTC

Then your reduced surface area makes you more heat efficient!
<quintopia> You're not crazy. you're the goddamn headprogrammingspock!
<Weeks> You're the goddamn headprogrammingspock!
<Cheese> I love you

User avatar
HenryS
Posts: 199
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:16 am UTC
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re: best excuse for being fat!

Postby HenryS » Fri Feb 13, 2009 4:18 pm UTC

You mean surface area to volume ratio. And the insulation probably doesn't hurt either :)

codyhotel
Posts: 319
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:54 pm UTC

Re: best excuse for being fat!

Postby codyhotel » Fri Feb 13, 2009 5:21 pm UTC

headprogrammingczar wrote:Then your reduced surface area makes you more heat efficient!


it also makes it hard for you to be digested, by say,

a raptor?

(not really, they would chew you up. only holds true if you stay whole, like say, by a T-Rex. I just said raptor for shock value.)
Philwelch wrote:Would a prostitution enthusiast be a buy-sexual?

...sorry.

Tac-Tics
Posts: 536
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:58 pm UTC

Re: best excuse for being fat!

Postby Tac-Tics » Fri Feb 13, 2009 10:15 pm UTC

mikau16 wrote:point to a slim guy and state that the two of you are topologically equivalent! one can be obtained from the other by stretching or shrinking, and you both contain the same number of holes!


Two spaces cannot be homeomorphic if one has a larger cardinality. A fatter person has more fat cells than a skinnier one, and so the two cannot homeomorphic.

User avatar
Xanthir
My HERO!!!
Posts: 5423
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:49 am UTC
Location: The Googleplex
Contact:

Re: best excuse for being fat!

Postby Xanthir » Fri Feb 13, 2009 11:38 pm UTC

Tac-Tics wrote:
mikau16 wrote:point to a slim guy and state that the two of you are topologically equivalent! one can be obtained from the other by stretching or shrinking, and you both contain the same number of holes!


Two spaces cannot be homeomorphic if one has a larger cardinality. A fatter person has more fat cells than a skinnier one, and so the two cannot homeomorphic.

Assume an ideal fat person.
(defun fibs (n &optional (a 1) (b 1)) (take n (unfold '+ a b)))

User avatar
headprogrammingczar
Posts: 3072
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 5:28 pm UTC
Location: Beaming you up

Re: best excuse for being fat!

Postby headprogrammingczar » Sat Feb 14, 2009 3:13 am UTC

Xanthir wrote:
Tac-Tics wrote:
mikau16 wrote:point to a slim guy and state that the two of you are topologically equivalent! one can be obtained from the other by stretching or shrinking, and you both contain the same number of holes!


Two spaces cannot be homeomorphic if one has a larger cardinality. A fatter person has more fat cells than a skinnier one, and so the two cannot homeomorphic.

Assume an ideal fat person.

Then we can optimize the math by treating him as a single point (assumes American (spherical) shape). BLACK HOLE!
<quintopia> You're not crazy. you're the goddamn headprogrammingspock!
<Weeks> You're the goddamn headprogrammingspock!
<Cheese> I love you

Matterwave1
Posts: 226
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 7:01 pm UTC

Re: best excuse for being fat!

Postby Matterwave1 » Sat Feb 14, 2009 3:20 am UTC

No because his digestive tract goes all the way through, so he's more like a donut. It's not topologically the same as a sphere.

User avatar
MartianInvader
Posts: 809
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 5:51 pm UTC

Re: best excuse for being fat!

Postby MartianInvader » Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:14 am UTC

You might not be so fat if you'd just stop eating all those coffee mugs.
Let's have a fervent argument, mostly over semantics, where we all claim the burden of proof is on the other side!

User avatar
UserGoogol
Posts: 90
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:58 am UTC

Re: best excuse for being fat!

Postby UserGoogol » Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:47 am UTC

Tac-Tics wrote:
mikau16 wrote:point to a slim guy and state that the two of you are topologically equivalent! one can be obtained from the other by stretching or shrinking, and you both contain the same number of holes!


Two spaces cannot be homeomorphic if one has a larger cardinality. A fatter person has more fat cells than a skinnier one, and so the two cannot homeomorphic.


Depends on how you define person. If you define a human as the subset of R3 that they occupy (perhaps with some property associated with each point), then the two sets have the same cardinality, [imath]2^{\aleph_0}[/imath] (and presumably, the same topology). Your definition is somewhat more spurious though, since representing cells as isolated points is even weirder. Also, as it happens, you're factually wrong. Fat people don't have more fat cells than thin people, they have bigger fat cells.

Matterwave1 wrote:No because his digestive tract goes all the way through, so he's more like a donut. It's not topologically the same as a sphere.


I think that the sinus cavity provides some additional holes.

User avatar
Harg
Posts: 130
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 8:24 pm UTC

Re: best excuse for being fat!

Postby Harg » Sat Feb 14, 2009 9:24 am UTC

I would agree that a person has genus at least 3.

User avatar
evilbeanfiend
Posts: 2650
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:05 am UTC
Location: the old world

Re: best excuse for being fat!

Postby evilbeanfiend » Sat Feb 14, 2009 11:09 am UTC

UserGoogol wrote: Fat people don't have more fat cells than thin people, they have bigger fat cells.


i'm pretty sure its possible to have both more fat cells and bigger fat cells. iirc putting on weight when you are young tends to increase the number of fat cells while when you are old tends to increase the size of each cell but i don't think it is a strict rule.
in ur beanz makin u eveel

mikau16
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 4:15 am UTC

Re: best excuse for being fat!

Postby mikau16 » Sat Feb 14, 2009 10:10 pm UTC

*gazes with satisfaction upon what he has started*

User avatar
gmalivuk
GNU Terry Pratchett
Posts: 26818
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
Location: Here and There
Contact:

Re: best excuse for being fat!

Postby gmalivuk » Sun Feb 15, 2009 5:58 pm UTC

*gazes with even greater satisfaction upon what he has finished*
Unless stated otherwise, I do not care whether a statement, by itself, constitutes a persuasive political argument. I care whether it's true.
---
If this post has math that doesn't work for you, use TeX the World for Firefox or Chrome

(he/him/his)


Return to “Mathematics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests