Hifaleetin' thoughts

Things that don't belong anywhere else. (Check first).

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

User avatar
Magnanimous
Madmanananimous
Posts: 3491
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:11 pm UTC
Location: Land of Hipsters and Rain (LOHAR)

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby Magnanimous » Mon Apr 26, 2010 11:14 pm UTC

Assuming you have a friend that listens to his/her iPod while driving:

1) Discretely get access to their music library. Pick a song that they're likely to listen to.
2) Using Audacity(or whatever), splice a fifteen-second clip of sirens into the song. Edit the sirens to increase and decrease in volume and include the Doppler Effect.
3) Save over the original song with the edited version.
4) Wait for them to tell you about their run-in with the invisible police. :P

User avatar
You, sir, name?
Posts: 6983
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:07 am UTC
Location: Chako Paul City
Contact:

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby You, sir, name? » Mon Apr 26, 2010 11:15 pm UTC

The hat in your avatar is well deserved.


Fin Archangel wrote:
You, sir, name? wrote:1. Download the music from Jaws onto your MP3 player.
2. Take the bus, make sure to sit in the front-most seat so you have a good look out of the front view.
3. Put (1) on repeat
4. Pretend the bus is chasing the car in front of you.


What happens when the bus stops?


You pause the Jaws music. The bus is like a cheetah. It can only sprint short distances before it needs to rest.
I edit my posts a lot and sometimes the words wrong order words appear in sentences get messed up.

User avatar
Fat Zombie
Posts: 588
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 10:28 am UTC
Location: The comfy chair.

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby Fat Zombie » Mon Apr 26, 2010 11:17 pm UTC

I can't draw any more. I can't think of original ideas or draw anything existing. I don't know what's happened. I've become too lazy, or something. It's like, trying to draw things is just making me angry. Lots of things are making me angry.
...And before you ask: yes, I do like to listen to myself talk!

User avatar
Whelan
Posts: 2214
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 1:16 pm UTC
Location: Londonshire.

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby Whelan » Mon Apr 26, 2010 11:26 pm UTC

Stupid ipod and iTunes being twatish. I hate you both.
"I like to be understood whenever I open my mouth; I have a horror of blinding people with science"- Richard Dawkins
Weeks wrote:
TaintedDeity wrote:And all I get is this tame space dragon. Where's my recognition?!
A tame dragon is its own reward.

User avatar
RetSpline
Posts: 607
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 5:38 pm UTC
Location: Íæû

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby RetSpline » Tue Apr 27, 2010 12:10 am UTC

Magnanimous wrote:Assuming you have a friend that listens to his/her iPod while driving:

1) Discretely get access to their music library. Pick a song that they're likely to listen to.
2) Using Audacity(or whatever), splice a fifteen-second clip of sirens into the song. Edit the sirens to increase and decrease in volume and include the Doppler Effect.
3) Save over the original song with the edited version.
4) Wait for them to tell you about their run-in with the invisible police. :P
My friends did this, except with Bohemian Rhapsody and the audio from some porn movie. And suggested it for music during the field trip. "Teh Lulz" were had by many.

User avatar
Fin Archangel
Posts: 597
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 12:42 am UTC
Location: in ur base, killing ur doodz
Contact:

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby Fin Archangel » Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:24 am UTC

...I need a picture of myself for this thing I'm applying to. I can't find one.
Spoiler:
Image

Gus-TT-Showbiz
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 8:34 pm UTC
Contact:

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby Gus-TT-Showbiz » Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:50 am UTC

Magnanimous wrote:Assuming you have a friend that listens to his/her iPod while driving:

1) Discretely get access to their music library. Pick a song that they're likely to listen to.
2) Using Audacity(or whatever), splice a fifteen-second clip of sirens into the song. Edit the sirens to increase and decrease in volume and include the Doppler Effect.
3) Save over the original song with the edited version.
4) Wait for them to tell you about their run-in with the invisible police. :P


I am in awe. You sir get many e-cookies.

My fleeting thought: is she using me, and I don't know it? Or do I know it, but I want to be close to her, so I let myself be used?


User avatar
modularblues
Posts: 689
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:33 am UTC
Location: Escher's Wonderland
Contact:

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby modularblues » Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:19 am UTC


Wow I didn't know this. And here I am trying not to become a jaded grad student.

The Cat

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby The Cat » Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:44 pm UTC

FRT-
The difference between cold war Soviet worker and American worker was liberty and hope. I'm not talking about some bull shit $2,000 dollar small business tax cut, I'm talking about competent refs. on the field, Agency accountability, and a sense of fair play. Passing laws increasing corporations ability to donate to political campaigns does little to the "swiss cheese" laws already in place. By that I mean, corporations have always been able to donate as much money as they want to parties and candidates. The only thing this finding accomplishes is damaging the perception of the entrepreneurial spirit. How many times do you think the small business entrepreneur got shafted by corrupt legislation? Golly Beave, but we got you this $2,000 dollar tax credit. Thanks Wally, but that will only cover 10% of my increase in cost to do business for the same year. New legislation is requiring A,B,C that only the large corporations can afford because they have an in house staff to cover it. Oh, so what your saying is the Tea Baggers stuck their balls in your mouth, but they gave you a glass of mouthwash to rinse. Exactly Wally, exactly.

The entrepreneur doesn't want a hand out, they want an environment where they can thrive.

Fiduciary responsibility.

User avatar
NecklaceOfShadow
Posts: 775
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 7:40 pm UTC
Location: In the alchemical aether
Contact:

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby NecklaceOfShadow » Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:55 am UTC

*sigh*

Always on stagecrew, never on stage.

At least I auditioned, I suppose.
Significantly less weird than I used to be. Still pretty weird.

οὗτός ἐστιν Ἀγαμέμνων, ἐμὸς
πόσις, νεκρὸς δὲ τῆσδε δεξιᾶς χερός
ἔργον δικαίας τέκτονος. τάδ’ ὧδ’ ἔχει.

User avatar
You, sir, name?
Posts: 6983
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:07 am UTC
Location: Chako Paul City
Contact:

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby You, sir, name? » Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:00 am UTC

I really need to work on reducing my sleep deficit. The dark circles around my eyes have dark circles around their eyes.

The day before yesterday was absolutely ridiculous. I was like a zombie all day, barely managing to keep awake. Got 8 hours last night, and I'm still seriously tired (even if it's better).
Last edited by You, sir, name? on Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:03 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.
I edit my posts a lot and sometimes the words wrong order words appear in sentences get messed up.

User avatar
Xeio
Friends, Faidites, Countrymen
Posts: 5101
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:12 am UTC
Location: C:\Users\Xeio\
Contact:

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby Xeio » Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:02 am UTC

You, sir, name? wrote:I really need to work on reducing my sleep deficit. The dark circles around my eyes have dark circles around their eyes.
Yes, if your dark circles are growing eyes, you definitely should get more sleep.

User avatar
Magnanimous
Madmanananimous
Posts: 3491
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:11 pm UTC
Location: Land of Hipsters and Rain (LOHAR)

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby Magnanimous » Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:10 am UTC

Last night, I accidentally slept for sixteen hours. I ended up missing a class, but I've pretty much caught up on sleep. :)

User avatar
You, sir, name?
Posts: 6983
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:07 am UTC
Location: Chako Paul City
Contact:

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby You, sir, name? » Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:14 am UTC

Magnanimous wrote:Last night, I accidentally slept for sixteen hours. I ended up missing a class, but I've pretty much caught up on sleep. :)


I should really do something like that. Unfortunately, I'm quite out of phase with the local time zone as it is.
I edit my posts a lot and sometimes the words wrong order words appear in sentences get messed up.

User avatar
bigglesworth
I feel like Biggles should have a title
Posts: 7461
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 9:29 pm UTC
Location: Airstrip One

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby bigglesworth » Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:17 am UTC

You could re-phase yourself then, end up going to sleep early but waking up on time.
Generation Y. I don't remember the First Gulf War, but do remember floppy disks.

User avatar
You, sir, name?
Posts: 6983
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:07 am UTC
Location: Chako Paul City
Contact:

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby You, sir, name? » Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:26 am UTC

bigglesworth wrote:You could re-phase yourself then, end up going to sleep early but waking up on time.


That's my intention, but my internal clock has different ideas.
I edit my posts a lot and sometimes the words wrong order words appear in sentences get messed up.

User avatar
RetSpline
Posts: 607
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 5:38 pm UTC
Location: Íæû

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby RetSpline » Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:27 am UTC

You, sir, name? wrote:
bigglesworth wrote:You could re-phase yourself then, end up going to sleep early but waking up on time.


That's my intention, but my internal clock has different ideas.
That guy's such an asshole sometimes.

User avatar
Fin Archangel
Posts: 597
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 12:42 am UTC
Location: in ur base, killing ur doodz
Contact:

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby Fin Archangel » Wed Apr 28, 2010 2:41 am UTC

RetSpline wrote:
You, sir, name? wrote:
bigglesworth wrote:You could re-phase yourself then, end up going to sleep early but waking up on time.


That's my intention, but my internal clock has different ideas.
That guy's such an asshole sometimes.


Seriously. Screw that guy. I'm always exhausted at like 11AM during school and when I try to sleep at night I want to get up and run in circles.
Spoiler:
Image

User avatar
Vohu Manah
athlete's nipple.
Posts: 316
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:00 am UTC
Location: Western Hemisphere. Possibly Idaho.

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby Vohu Manah » Wed Apr 28, 2010 3:01 am UTC

I once had an internal clock. After a less than polite colloquy with it, our irreconcilable differences forced me to teach it a lesson with a katana and a hake. Unfortunately, it won.

Also, I'm convinced that every instance involving overuse of the word 'whom' causes a large migration of flying pigs on some distant planet.
Isaac Hill wrote:If this tetonic plate's rockin' such that it registers no less than 6.1 on the Richter scale, don't come a knockin'.

User avatar
Briareos
Posts: 1940
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 12:40 pm UTC
Location: Town of the Big House

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby Briareos » Wed Apr 28, 2010 3:33 am UTC

Vohu Manah wrote:Also, I'm convinced that every instance involving overuse of the word 'whom' causes a large migration of flying pigs on some distant planet.
Like, earth pigs? Or some distant-planet analogue that we can most easily understand by labeling it "pig"?
Sandry wrote:Bless you, Briareos.

Blriaraisghaasghoasufdpt.
Oregonaut wrote:Briareos is my new bestest friend.

User avatar
Vohu Manah
athlete's nipple.
Posts: 316
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:00 am UTC
Location: Western Hemisphere. Possibly Idaho.

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby Vohu Manah » Wed Apr 28, 2010 4:27 am UTC

Briareos wrote:Like, earth pigs? Or some distant-planet analogue that we can most easily understand by labeling it "pig"?

I was thinking they would be a strange combination of both, with a large label hovering above them denoting their name. Add in a picture of bacon above their heads too. You don't want to confuse any strange lifeforms on the surface.
Isaac Hill wrote:If this tetonic plate's rockin' such that it registers no less than 6.1 on the Richter scale, don't come a knockin'.

User avatar
Amie
Posts: 910
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:34 am UTC
Location: in Somnia.

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby Amie » Wed Apr 28, 2010 4:34 am UTC

Stephen Hawking says we mustn't try and contact aliens if they do exist at all. I tend to agree.
Summer is miles and miles away, and no one would ask me to stay.
And I, should contemplate this change... to ease the pain.
And I, should step out of the rain... turn away.

User avatar
Magnanimous
Madmanananimous
Posts: 3491
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:11 pm UTC
Location: Land of Hipsters and Rain (LOHAR)

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby Magnanimous » Wed Apr 28, 2010 5:06 am UTC

By Saturday, I have to write a 1500-word paper arguing for or against limiting the number of children that couples can raise. (Similar to China's One-child policy, but it'd be more like two or three.) After about an hour of research, this is what I've come up with.

Arguments For: Reduces strain on education, cuts healthcare costs, less damage to the environment, decreases unemployment rates, decreases poverty, reduces number of orphans
Arguments Against: GOD WANTS PEOPLE TO MAKE BABIES D:<

I think I'll be arguing for it.

User avatar
Zohar
COMMANDER PORN
Posts: 8572
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:45 pm UTC
Location: Denver

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby Zohar » Wed Apr 28, 2010 5:17 am UTC

There's also involvement of the government in child-raising policies (we don't need a license to be parents, we aren't told how to raise our children, why should they tell us not to have more?) - the whole freedom issue. I'm sure there are some developmental advantages to growing up in a big family. Just as having less children reduces the number of orphans so does it increase the risk of parents remaining childless. Less unemployment but also less help around the farm. One could argue that five environmentally-conscious children pollute less than one or two who don't care about the environment, plus it raises the percent of people in support of green whatever. There's the psychological strain on the children - "You're all we have, you must be really excellent and we expect so much from you". Suppose a family has a quadruplet or quintuplet (by accident or because they need help in getting pregnant) - do you force them to abort some of their unborn (cue ABORTION IS MURDER calls or simply going against the family's beliefs)? If you don't force them to abort and the entire country is completely targeted at having only two children per couple, how would society see a family that suddenly has five children? What about single parents - are they allowed only a single child? They could potentially marry someone with children and form a *gasp* four-children family!

I'm not saying it's a good or bad idea, I'm just saying there are plenty of reasons against such a decision.
Mighty Jalapeno: "See, Zohar agrees, and he's nice to people."
SecondTalon: "Still better looking than Jesus."

Not how I say my name

User avatar
Magnanimous
Madmanananimous
Posts: 3491
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:11 pm UTC
Location: Land of Hipsters and Rain (LOHAR)

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby Magnanimous » Wed Apr 28, 2010 5:39 am UTC

*turns off sarcasm mode*

There are a lot of reasons against it, but most of them seem to be religiously charged... That's what I meant. One of the biggest problems is that a pregnancy doesn't always result in one child, so that puts a damper on child limits unless you're in favor of abortion. And considering how many pro-life people there are, it's hugely unlikely that anyone would go for something like this. (Another option is to put the "extra" child up for adoption, but I have the feeling that just as many people would object to that.)

We're allowed to specify some terms in the paper, so right now I'm planning on a limit of three children with the option to apply for more. "Farm" families do tend to need more help around the house, so they would be allowed to have more, but families living in big cities can do fine with 1-3. I've read a lot about China's policies, and it turns out that putting the limit at one has a lot of bad side effects... There's more pressure on the child, like you said, and the male-oriented society means that in the case of twins/triplets, families are choosing to keep a male baby. Right now, the teenage population in China is something like 65% male.

User avatar
Zohar
COMMANDER PORN
Posts: 8572
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:45 pm UTC
Location: Denver

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby Zohar » Wed Apr 28, 2010 5:50 am UTC

I wasn't trying to convince you against it. Does your paper have to argue specifically one side? Can't it just say "here are the arguments for and against, this is why we should, this is why we shouldn't?"

Also, I don't think restricting at three children does anything much, especially considering the average number of children per household in the US is around 1.8 (0.9 if you take average of all households, not only those with children).
Mighty Jalapeno: "See, Zohar agrees, and he's nice to people."
SecondTalon: "Still better looking than Jesus."

Not how I say my name

User avatar
broken_escalator
They're called stairs
Posts: 3312
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:49 am UTC
Location: _| ̄|○

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby broken_escalator » Wed Apr 28, 2010 5:59 am UTC

Who knows, it could motivate some people to have more than 3 kids just because it is restricted. That'll show the man!

I kid, I kid.

User avatar
SlyReaper
inflatable
Posts: 8015
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:09 pm UTC
Location: Bristol, Old Blighty

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby SlyReaper » Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:45 am UTC

Zohar wrote:Also, I don't think restricting at three children does anything much, especially considering the average number of children per household in the US is around 1.8 (0.9 if you take average of all households, not only those with children).


I also thought 3 was an odd number to pick. If your aim is population stability (and I'm struggling to think of any other reasons you'd want to regulate childbirth), then the magic number is 2. One to replace mummy, one to replace daddy.

I don't know how it works in other countries but in the UK, parents get more child benefit payments for every child they have. Instead of outright banning having more than n children, perhaps a better way would be to only give state support to the first n children, and any children you have after that are your sole responsibility to provide for. Or possibly levy a tax against surplus children if your country doesn't provide child benefits. That deals with the problem of multiple-child pregnancies: you don't have to get rid of any of them, you'll just be worse off financially. And I imagine multiple-child pregnancies would be eligible for an exception anyway.
Image
What would Baron Harkonnen do?

User avatar
smw543
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 4:45 am UTC
Location: Orlando, Florida

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby smw543 » Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:31 am UTC

Magnanimous wrote:There are a lot of reasons against it, but most of them seem to be religiously charged... That's what I meant. One of the biggest problems is that a pregnancy doesn't always result in one child, so that puts a damper on child limits unless you're in favor of abortion. And considering how many pro-life people there are, it's hugely unlikely that anyone would go for something like this. (Another option is to put the "extra" child up for adoption, but I have the feeling that just as many people would object to that.)

The only legitimate argument I can think of concerning multiple-birth pregnancies is the issue of stigma that Zohar mentioned (which can already be seen in stereotypes about Catholics and Orthodox Jews, who are more likely on average to violate cultural norms on the number of children a couple should have). Putting up the extra kids for adoption is just vindictive—the population is still increased, but now those kids have all the difficulties that come with being an orphan (also, it's pretty fucked up to make the parents choose). Aborting some of the fetuses isn't really necessary considering how incredibly rare quadruplets are (and it only gets rarer as the number increases. And again, making the parents choose is problematic).

Anyways, assuming you accept that having X (insert your threshold here) children is bad1, then X+1 is worse, and X+2 even more so, while the value of your right to make babies remains constant, and will eventually be outweighed by the public's right to not have all their resources consumed by little Magnanimice.

People rant about how evil China's restrictions are, but (according to China) they prevented more than a quarter of a billion births in the first 21 years (1979-2000). When we2 idiotically triggered skyrocketing grain prices with our corn-car experiment, China took a serious hit; if their population had been ~20% higher, they would have been seriously pissed. Like, "This is your fault, Americans. Give us reasonable prices or no more cheap plastic toys." Extrapolating for an equivalent event 50 years from now, it would be more like "Give us your crop surplus, or we invade our food producing neighbors."

ninja'd:
SlyReaper wrote:Or possibly levy a tax against surplus children if your country doesn't provide child benefits. That deals with the problem of multiple-child pregnancies: you don't have to get rid of any of them, you'll just be worse off financially. And I imagine multiple-child pregnancies would be eligible for an exception anyway.
Was about to type something like this. Anyway, you will probably get people arguing that such a tax violates people's reproductive rights—and when you consider that it particularly effects the poor, who are disproportionately composed of certain ethnic minorities, you can add concerns about racism. But if you make an exemption for people who can't afford the tax, the racists will get pissed because said minorities will be unaffected, while the predominately white middle class (who can afford the tax, but are still poor enough to see it as a real disincentive) will stick to having one or two kids. (Of course, they'll dress it up with accusations of socialism, etc., but regardless, they will oppose it for the same reason they oppose Hispanic immigration—they're afraid of losing their majority status.)2

1Which follows naturally from thinking that massive overpopulation is bad; the only question is whether it is bad enough to outweigh the arguments against reproductive regulation.

2Go go gadget Americentrism!
Spoiler:
LE4dGOLEM wrote:Now you know the difference between funny and sad.
Ubik wrote:But I'm too fond of the penis to let it go.
gmalivuk wrote:If you didn't want people to 'mis'understand you, then you probably should have tried saying something less stupid.

User avatar
e^iπ+1=0
Much, much better than Gooder
Posts: 2065
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 9:41 am UTC
Location: Lancaster

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby e^iπ+1=0 » Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:54 am UTC

Holy crap, when did it suddenly get so late? I'm only going to get 4-5 hours now. Not that this is too different from usual, but I had actually planned to get a bit more sleep tonight because of a big test tomorrow.
poxic wrote:You, sir, have heroic hair.
poxic wrote:I note that the hair is not slowing down. It appears to have progressed from heroic to rocking.

(Avatar by Sungura)

User avatar
Moo
Oh man! I'm going to be so rebellious! I'm gonna...
Posts: 6441
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:15 pm UTC
Location: Beyond the goblin city
Contact:

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby Moo » Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:21 am UTC

If you can specify terms I don't understand all this talk of forced abortions, just define it as x number of successful pregnancies (but if someone has more than x in their first pregnancy maybe they don't get to try again). Natural* n-tuplets get treated as one pregnancy, problem solved.

* in-vitro pregnancies would have to be regulated so they don't implant so many eggs, which currently very often result in n-tuplets.


Question to ponder: what about people who have a religious (or other) objection to birth control, how would such a law affect their freedom of beliefs?
Proverbs 9:7-8 wrote:Anyone who rebukes a mocker will get an insult in return. Anyone who corrects the wicked will get hurt. So don't bother correcting mockers; they will only hate you.
Hawknc wrote:FFT: I didn't realise Proverbs 9:7-8 was the first recorded instance of "haters gonna hate"

Hit3k
Posts: 1156
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 9:12 am UTC
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby Hit3k » Wed Apr 28, 2010 9:04 am UTC

I'm trying to rewrite some code my lecturer gave us... It is not going well. LEARN TO COMMENT YOUR CODE. Please.
Sungura wrote:My mom made me watch a star wars. Two of them , actually. The Death Star one and the one where the dude ends up in the swamp with the weird guy who talks funny.

User avatar
smw543
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 4:45 am UTC
Location: Orlando, Florida

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby smw543 » Wed Apr 28, 2010 9:18 am UTC

Moo wrote:* in-vitro pregnancies would have to be regulated so they don't implant so many eggs, which currently very often result in n-tuplets.

Wikipedia says there are already some regulations—Canada, UK, NZ, and Australia have a limit of two; three if the woman is over 40. The odds of a given embryo surviving aren't great, so 2-3 seems reasonable to avoid cases where none are viable, though this still results in many having to try several times (if they can afford it; the advantage to transferring many embryos is that you're mainly paying for the procedure, so there's little difference in cost between 2 and 8).

There's probably a thread for this, or at least there should be.
Spoiler:
LE4dGOLEM wrote:Now you know the difference between funny and sad.
Ubik wrote:But I'm too fond of the penis to let it go.
gmalivuk wrote:If you didn't want people to 'mis'understand you, then you probably should have tried saying something less stupid.

User avatar
Moo
Oh man! I'm going to be so rebellious! I'm gonna...
Posts: 6441
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:15 pm UTC
Location: Beyond the goblin city
Contact:

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby Moo » Wed Apr 28, 2010 9:30 am UTC

I didn't know about the regulations, thanks. As for the rest - I am well aware, I was supposing purely from the point of view that such a law would be seriously considered, as per the terms of the assignment that got me thinking about it all.
Proverbs 9:7-8 wrote:Anyone who rebukes a mocker will get an insult in return. Anyone who corrects the wicked will get hurt. So don't bother correcting mockers; they will only hate you.
Hawknc wrote:FFT: I didn't realise Proverbs 9:7-8 was the first recorded instance of "haters gonna hate"

User avatar
SlyReaper
inflatable
Posts: 8015
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:09 pm UTC
Location: Bristol, Old Blighty

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby SlyReaper » Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:11 pm UTC

smw543 wrote:ninja'd:
SlyReaper wrote:Or possibly levy a tax against surplus children if your country doesn't provide child benefits. That deals with the problem of multiple-child pregnancies: you don't have to get rid of any of them, you'll just be worse off financially. And I imagine multiple-child pregnancies would be eligible for an exception anyway.
Was about to type something like this. Anyway, you will probably get people arguing that such a tax violates people's reproductive rights—and when you consider that it particularly effects the poor, who are disproportionately composed of certain ethnic minorities, you can add concerns about racism. But if you make an exemption for people who can't afford the tax, the racists will get pissed because said minorities will be unaffected, while the predominately white middle class (who can afford the tax, but are still poor enough to see it as a real disincentive) will stick to having one or two kids. (Of course, they'll dress it up with accusations of socialism, etc., but regardless, they will oppose it for the same reason they oppose Hispanic immigration—they're afraid of losing their majority status.)2


Don't exempt the poor from the tax then. The idea is to make people only have as many children as they can afford to adequately provide for. Alternatively, make the tax means-tested. So the fee for going one child over the limit would be x% of the household's annual income.

I know. It's very very harsh to consider taking money from people when they have just had a new baby and need all the money they can get. But the long-term effects of uncontrolled population growth would be far far worse. This little rock is already pretty crowded. To put numbers on it, wikipedia says world population growth is about 1.14% p.a, which is a doubling time of 61 years. We have 6.8 billion people now. In 61 years, we will have 13.6 billion people. In 122 years, we will have 27.2 billion people. Less than 2 lifetimes. There isn't enough space or food or water to fit that many people on Earth, so something will eventually force our population growth to decline. That something will likely be something very unpleasant like war, famine, disease, or drought. I'd say it's better for us to choose for ourselves exactly how we limit our population so that we might avoid such things.
Image
What would Baron Harkonnen do?

User avatar
You, sir, name?
Posts: 6983
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:07 am UTC
Location: Chako Paul City
Contact:

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby You, sir, name? » Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:17 pm UTC

Waaaaait a minute! This is serious discussion, complete with walls of text and a mature topic! What are you doing in FT?! Shoo, I say! Make way for exclamations like "FT: My eye is hurting."


FT: My eye is hurting.
I edit my posts a lot and sometimes the words wrong order words appear in sentences get messed up.

User avatar
Moo
Oh man! I'm going to be so rebellious! I'm gonna...
Posts: 6441
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:15 pm UTC
Location: Beyond the goblin city
Contact:

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby Moo » Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:20 pm UTC

FT: I found pretty and cheap boots for winter work outfits this weekend, hooray! Now just to get the unborked ankle that will allow me to wear them (they has heels).
Proverbs 9:7-8 wrote:Anyone who rebukes a mocker will get an insult in return. Anyone who corrects the wicked will get hurt. So don't bother correcting mockers; they will only hate you.
Hawknc wrote:FFT: I didn't realise Proverbs 9:7-8 was the first recorded instance of "haters gonna hate"

User avatar
You, sir, name?
Posts: 6983
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:07 am UTC
Location: Chako Paul City
Contact:

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby You, sir, name? » Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:30 pm UTC

Moo wrote:FT: I found pretty and cheap boots for winter work outfits this weekend, hooray! Now just to get the unborked ankle that will allow me to wear them (they has heels).


I first read this as "I found pretty and cheap [ro]bots for winter work". Then I was disappointed.
I edit my posts a lot and sometimes the words wrong order words appear in sentences get messed up.

User avatar
Sir_Elderberry
Posts: 4206
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 6:50 pm UTC
Location: Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
Contact:

Re: Fleeting/Random/Thoughts (Random like the plague)

Postby Sir_Elderberry » Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:58 pm UTC

Last I checked, the dramatic drop in birth rates in developed countries was predicted to cause a peak in global population in 2060 or so. The real solution to population growth isn't regulating developed countries, since in many of them (especially Europe) the birth rate is already crazy low (1.0 in parts of Germany). You need to work on the economic problems in the Third World, especially female empowerment and infant mortality.
http://www.geekyhumanist.blogspot.com -- Science and the Concerned Voter
Belial wrote:You are the coolest guy that ever cooled.

I reiterate. Coolest. Guy.

Well. You heard him.


Return to “General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests