Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates

 Posts: 236
 Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:18 pm UTC
Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
Which mathematical concept do you like more? Make sure you don't confuse addition and summation since they are different. Since my last topic comparing opinions on mathematical concepts (lines and curves) went so well I decided to make another one. If this one goes well as well maybe I will make another one in about a week. Idea requests for my next topic are welcome.
Last edited by scratch123 on Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:44 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.

 Posts: 242
 Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 4:01 am UTC
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
I don't know which concept I like more, but summation is more versatile than multiplication. Summation can completely replace multiplication, as if you want xy for some constants x and y, you can just do a summation of y x times (or vice versa). However, with summation, you can do things like sum (n+1), with n going from 1 to 8, and you just don't get that with multiplication.
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
Anonymously Famous wrote:Summation can completely replace multiplication
Only if you allow noninteger numbers of iterations (in which case, I'd argue that it's no longer been reduced solely to summation as you need some notion of noninteger iteration).
my pronouns are they
Magnanimous wrote:(fuck the macrons)

 Posts: 21
 Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:35 am UTC
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
gmalivuk wrote:What?
Pancakes v. waffles for people slightly more mathematically minded.
I think. I can't really tell, either.
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
Otter?
 Indigo is a lie.
Which idiot decided that websites can't go within 4cm of the edge of the screen?
There should be a null word, for the question "Is anybody there?" and to see if microphones are on.

 Posts: 242
 Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 4:01 am UTC
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
eSOANEM wrote:Anonymously Famous wrote:Summation can completely replace multiplication
Only if you allow noninteger numbers of iterations (in which case, I'd argue that it's no longer been reduced solely to summation as you need some notion of noninteger iteration).
You are, of course, correct. I'd neglected to consider noninteger multiplication. Silly me. As long as one is an integer, though, it still works. If not... Well, it can take the place of multiplication in several instances, so it's still pretty cool.
 gmalivuk
 GNU Terry Pratchett
 Posts: 26765
 Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
 Location: Here and There
 Contact:
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
Good point.Macbi wrote:Otter?
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
gmalivuk wrote:Good point.Macbi wrote:Otter?
We're not talking about points until next week.
This signature is Y2K compliant.
Last updated 6/29/108
Last updated 6/29/108
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
Anonymously Famous wrote:I don't know which concept I like more, but summation is more versatile than multiplication. Summation can completely replace multiplication, as if you want xy for some constants x and y, you can just do a summation of y x times (or vice versa). However, with summation, you can do things like sum (n+1), with n going from 1 to 8, and you just don't get that with multiplication.
Not in Galois fields you can't!
Summum ius, summa iniuria.
 jestingrabbit
 Factoids are just Datas that haven't grown up yet
 Posts: 5967
 Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:50 pm UTC
 Location: Sydney
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
Anonymously Famous wrote:However, with summation, you can do things like sum (n+1), with n going from 1 to 8, and you just don't get that with multiplication.
What?
[math]\prod_{n=1}^8 (n+1) = 9!.[/math]
I otter ducked... this question sucks.
ameretrifle wrote:Magic space feudalism is therefore a viable idea.
 phlip
 Restorer of Worlds
 Posts: 7572
 Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:56 am UTC
 Location: Australia
 Contact:
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
I think that, on balance, I much prefer ducks to curtains. I'm open to being convinced, though.
Code: Select all
enum ಠ_ಠ {°□°╰=1, °Д°╰, ಠ益ಠ╰};
void ┻━┻︵╰(ಠ_ಠ ⚠) {exit((int)⚠);}
 jestingrabbit
 Factoids are just Datas that haven't grown up yet
 Posts: 5967
 Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:50 pm UTC
 Location: Sydney
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
Everyone needs their privacy. Quacking is a luxury. Ergo, curtains.
ameretrifle wrote:Magic space feudalism is therefore a viable idea.
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
[imath]\ln\left(\prod x_n \right) = \sum \ln\left( x_n \right)[/imath]
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
dissonant wrote:[imath]\ln\left(\prod x_n \right) = \sum \ln\left( x_n \right)[/imath]
Actually it's not exactly true
Spoiler:
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
Tryss wrote:Spoiler:
Actually it's not exactly true
Spoiler:
[imath]\ln\left(\prod x_n \right) = \sum \ln\left( x_n \right)[/imath] to remove all problems.
 phlip
 Restorer of Worlds
 Posts: 7572
 Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:56 am UTC
 Location: Australia
 Contact:
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
The OP made a big thing about not confusing addition with a summation... presumably the same distinction applies to multiplication vs sequence products. So we're comparing the multiplication of a number of individuallyspecified terms, with the sum of a sequence of values.
Hence my comparison with the "curtains or ducks" bit.
Hence my comparison with the "curtains or ducks" bit.
Code: Select all
enum ಠ_ಠ {°□°╰=1, °Д°╰, ಠ益ಠ╰};
void ┻━┻︵╰(ಠ_ಠ ⚠) {exit((int)⚠);}

 Posts: 236
 Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:18 pm UTC
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
Ugh sometimes I really hate mods. Just so you know I did not put that "otter" option into the poll. I edited the poll again to return it to its original state.
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
scratch123 wrote:Ugh sometimes I really hate mods. Just so you know I did not put that "otter" option into the poll. I edited the poll again to return it to its original state.
Otter option IS best option.
double epsilon = .0000001;
 Cleverbeans
 Posts: 1378
 Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 1:16 pm UTC
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
scratch123 admits to tampering with the otter vote, and once again democracy fails. For shame....
"Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration."  Abraham Lincoln
 gmalivuk
 GNU Terry Pratchett
 Posts: 26765
 Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
 Location: Here and There
 Contact:
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
If you don't want me adding foolish options to your polls, might I suggest you find things to post about other than foolish polls?scratch123 wrote:Ugh sometimes I really hate mods. Just so you know I did not put that "otter" option into the poll. I edited the poll again to return it to its original state.
 MartianInvader
 Posts: 808
 Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 5:51 pm UTC
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
Clearly the summation operotter.
Let's have a fervent argument, mostly over semantics, where we all claim the burden of proof is on the other side!
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
scratch123 wrote:Idea requests for my next topic are welcome.
How about "Ridiculous poll" or "Pointless poll" you can then use those results for the poll after that.

 Posts: 236
 Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:18 pm UTC
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
gmalivuk wrote:If you don't want me adding foolish options to your polls, might I suggest you find things to post about other than foolish polls?scratch123 wrote:Ugh sometimes I really hate mods. Just so you know I did not put that "otter" option into the poll. I edited the poll again to return it to its original state.
Whats so foolish about it? Are you not allowed to have opinions about abstract concepts?
 gmalivuk
 GNU Terry Pratchett
 Posts: 26765
 Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
 Location: Here and There
 Contact:
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
You can have opinions on anything you want. That's not the same as wanting to create a silly poll about every single one of them. If you don't actually have something mathematical to discuss, I fail to see why you need to create a thread in the mathematics forum.
Also, who are you to declare that my opinion about an abstract concept cannot be "otter"?
Also, who are you to declare that my opinion about an abstract concept cannot be "otter"?

 Posts: 236
 Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:18 pm UTC
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
gmalivuk wrote:You can have opinions on anything you want. That's not the same as wanting to create a silly poll about every single one of them. If you don't actually have something mathematical to discuss, I fail to see why you need to create a thread in the mathematics forum.
Also, who are you to declare that my opinion about an abstract concept cannot be "otter"?
So is making polls discouraged here or something? Polls do give you something to discuss since in addition to voting you can give reasons as to why you think that way. I think talking about the subjective parts of math is important.
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
scratch123 wrote:So is making polls discouraged here or something?
This poll, and the lines and curves one, seems almost trolly to me though. You give very little context on what exactly you are wanting people to compare about two topics both of which are fundamental and (one could argue) indispensable.
Spoiler:
 doogly
 Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
 Posts: 5531
 Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
 Location: Lexington, MA
 Contact:
Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)
Duck.
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests