Sound arguments AGAINST anthropogenic climate change?

For the discussion of the sciences. Physics problems, chemistry equations, biology weirdness, it all goes here.

Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates

User avatar
tzar1990
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 5:57 am UTC

Sound arguments AGAINST anthropogenic climate change?

Postby tzar1990 » Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:43 am UTC

Well, I'm a biology student, and I've always taken anthropogenic climate change as being most likely present, based on the data we've collected so far, and worth dealing with, since the costs of doing nothing if it's real outweigh, in my opinion, the costs of doing something if it's not. However, reading some discussions online, I've come to realize that I've never actually read any serious arguments against climate change, and dismissed the ones I saw as ill-informed or politically motivated. Needless to say, that's not exactly a very good attitude to have as a scientist.

As such, I'm looking for well-written papers or articles with a solid scientific foundation that conclude the climate change is most likely not anthropogenic. While I doubt I'll believe them anyways (confirmation bias ahoy!), I can at least try to maintain a properly open mind.

So, anyone have some good papers to recommend?
Last edited by gmalivuk on Thu Jan 12, 2012 5:14 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Changed the title to describe the actual request.
The universe is full of magical things patiently waiting for our wits to grow sharper. ~Eden Phillpotts, A Shadow Passes

User avatar
tomandlu
Posts: 1111
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 10:22 am UTC
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Re: Any scientifically sound arguments AGAINST climate chang

Postby tomandlu » Thu Jan 12, 2012 10:47 am UTC

IMHO pretty much any decent paper will be 'against' climate change in the sense that it will not state with absolute certainty that climate change is incontrovertible. This, plus their own naivety, has placed the climate scientists in an unenviable position - on the one hand, admitting this just raises a chorus of "see - told you" from the antis, but fighting it raises a different chorus of "see - they're making unsupportable claims".
How can I think my way out of the problem when the problem is the way I think?

User avatar
Jplus
Posts: 1721
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 12:29 pm UTC
Location: Netherlands

Re: Any scientifically sound arguments AGAINST climate chang

Postby Jplus » Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:10 pm UTC

If you want scientific studies that argue against climate change being anthropogenic, you should change the thread title... Right now it seems like you're looking for scientific studies that suggest there will be no climate change at all. Everyone, please keep a clear distinction between those two things.
"There are only two hard problems in computer science: cache coherence, naming things, and off-by-one errors." (Phil Karlton and Leon Bambrick)

coding and xkcd combined

(Julian/Julian's)

User avatar
gmalivuk
GNU Terry Pratchett
Posts: 26820
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
Location: Here and There
Contact:

Re: Sound arguments AGAINST anthropogenic climate change?

Postby gmalivuk » Thu Jan 12, 2012 5:16 pm UTC

Yeah, I changed the title to reflect what is actually being requested. At this point, arguing against the claim that the climate is changing in the first place has stopped being remotely scientifically sound, but I suppose reasonable arguments can still be had about the degree to which it is anthropogenic.
Unless stated otherwise, I do not care whether a statement, by itself, constitutes a persuasive political argument. I care whether it's true.
---
If this post has math that doesn't work for you, use TeX the World for Firefox or Chrome

(he/him/his)

User avatar
Username4242
Posts: 168
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 9:03 pm UTC
Location: (Previously) Montana State University--Bozeman, Montana.

Re: Sound arguments AGAINST anthropogenic climate change?

Postby Username4242 » Thu Jan 12, 2012 6:01 pm UTC

With my (admittedly limited) understanding of climate science, even the extent to which the observed change is anthropogenic is pretty well sealed. The fact is, climate scientists cannot reconstruct anything close to the observed temperature record and climatic behavior without the addition of CO2 forcings, the vast majority of which are anthropogenic in origin. The big question now is to what degree the future climate will change, and that will be a consequence of the behavior of various feedback loops (e.g. the changes in albedo caused by reduced sea ice extent) and the degree to which CO2 emissions change over time (reduction, 'business as usual', or an increase in emissions).

User avatar
Bears!
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 1:31 pm UTC

Re: Sound arguments AGAINST anthropogenic climate change?

Postby Bears! » Thu Jan 12, 2012 6:11 pm UTC

I'd recommend this website. It might look a little sketchy because of the ads, but the arguments for and against global climate change are legitimate (they cite papers and everything!). Granted, this website finds anthropogenic global climate change undeniably true (and I agree with them), but there is dialog between skeptics and non-skeptics for each article. In addition, each individual article actually gives a true (as in, this is what skeptics really say) representation of the arguments against anthropogenic global climate change. I know it's not exactly what you were looking for, but solid websites and resources critical of global climate change are hard to come by simply because the consensus on global climate change among climate researchers is that anthropogenic climate change is real (consensus = 97-98% agree that anthropogenic climate change is real). While consensus shouldn't convince anyone (evidence should), it indicates that the evidence is incredibly strong (i.e. virtually undeniable).

Hope this helps a little!
"It was books that taught me that the things that tormented me most were the very things that connected me with all the people who were alive, or who had ever been alive." - James Baldwin

User avatar
EMTP
Posts: 1556
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 7:39 pm UTC
Location: Elbow deep in (mostly) other people's blood.

Re: Sound arguments AGAINST anthropogenic climate change?

Postby EMTP » Fri Jan 13, 2012 7:05 pm UTC

There aren't any.

Serious people (which, in terms of climate "skeptics," is very much a relative term) no longer argue AGW, but rather focus on "CAGW" ("catastrophic anthropogenic global warming") a popular straw man used to describe the mainstream view that rapid, costly, destructive climate change is likely. They use a few arguments:

* Warming trends are running less than expected, so climate sensitivity may be lower than predicted.

* Natural variability may be greater than we think (paleoclimatology is hard) and hence some significant part of the warming trend may be not just AGW, but AGW + (unspecified natural forcing).

* Harms from warming may be overstated; benefits from warming may be understated.

All of these lines of argument have serious problems, but none as severe as those encountered by deniers of any and all AGW. The emphasis among "serious" "skeptics" is on minimizing the significance of AGW rather than denying it. Roy Spencer, John Christy, and Judith Curry are examples of this outlook.
"Reasonable – that is, human – men will always be capable of compromise, but men who have dehumanized themselves by becoming the blind worshipers of an idea or an ideal are fanatics whose devotion to abstractions makes them the enemies of life."
-- Alan Watts, "The Way of Zen"

User avatar
The Geoff
Posts: 144
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:22 am UTC

Re: Sound arguments AGAINST anthropogenic climate change?

Postby The Geoff » Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:57 am UTC

There's a cod-science equation to be done here:

$-available-to-anti-AGW-industry > $-available-to-independant-research

scientists-who-like-$ > scientists-who-don't-care-about-$

scientific-papers-in-favour-of-AGW > scientific-papers-refuting-AGW

Therefore the money points at AGW.

Me? I'm undecided to the point of having to take the balance of evidence presented to me, so I believe in AGW.

Numquam
Posts: 162
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 3:13 am UTC

Re: Sound arguments AGAINST anthropogenic climate change?

Postby Numquam » Sat Jan 14, 2012 10:13 pm UTC

The Geoff wrote:
$-available-to-anti-AGW-industry > $-available-to-independant-research


Wah?

Ever heard of the oil and gas industry?
admiror, o internet, te non cecidisse (ruinis)
qui tot scriptorum taedia sustineas

mfb
Posts: 950
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:48 pm UTC

Re: Sound arguments AGAINST anthropogenic climate change?

Postby mfb » Sat Jan 14, 2012 11:00 pm UTC

Probably, therefore he says that this side has more money.

User avatar
Gagundathar The Inexplicable
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:52 am UTC
Location: Sol-3, North America, USA, Georgia, Athens

Re: Sound arguments AGAINST anthropogenic climate change?

Postby Gagundathar The Inexplicable » Sun Jan 22, 2012 10:50 pm UTC

Egads, y'all.
It seems pretty much decided that the total amount of energy in the atmosphere is significantly larger than it was 50 years ago.
This will obviously have some effect on the atmospheric balance of energy. Now, we can all pretend that anthropogenic caused energy increase along with the associated results of demonstrably energy trapping emissions are not causing the changes in the climate.
And, of course, it isn't human activity that is causing these changes.

But, by doing so, I believe we doom our next generations to some horrible existence and if we can change it, then what kind of folks are we not do so?

Is there an answer?
Do we have any solution?
As our oil is depleted, we are forced to use more coal, which produces measurably larger amounts of CO2.

We all like to pretend that this is some political football game.
It isn't; it is as real as rain.

Now what do we do?

Do we just pretend this is something cooked up by 'them liberal scientists'
Or do we do something about it?

Is there ANYTHING we can do, as citizens?
We can petition the Federal government, but I'll bet you dollars to donuts that won't any difference.

Not a single politician out there has come out and said, "Yes, this is our problem and we are going to deal with it".

Not One.

Without that kind of support we are all truly screwed.

JWalker
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 1:13 am UTC

Re: Sound arguments AGAINST anthropogenic climate change?

Postby JWalker » Sun Jan 22, 2012 11:45 pm UTC

Gagundathar The Inexplicable wrote:Without that kind of support we are all truly screwed.


That is definitely true. However, sometimes I wonder if at this point we are screwed no matter what we do. That is all the more reason to at least try to do something about it though.


Return to “Science”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests