1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

This forum is for the individual discussion thread that goes with each new comic.

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

User avatar
rhomboidal
Posts: 801
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:25 pm UTC
Contact:

1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby rhomboidal » Fri Jan 20, 2012 5:07 am UTC

Image

Title Text: "Roger Ebert once called you directionless and unwatchable."

But I'll bet Ryan Reynolds could and would play the part.

User avatar
glasnt
Posts: 539
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:18 am UTC
Location: SQUEE!

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby glasnt » Fri Jan 20, 2012 5:13 am UTC

I claim this thread to be the first one.

Also, I'd pick Tory Belleci instead of Ryan Reynolds, but that's just me.

Oh, you mean unlike-able...

User avatar
SpringLoaded12
Posts: 350
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 1:58 am UTC
Location: Guarding the Super Missile
Contact:

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby SpringLoaded12 » Fri Jan 20, 2012 5:15 am UTC

Gah! I saw there was no thread, started making one, saw TrueNarnian's and thus discarded mine, then noticed TrueNarnian's wasn't even close to the right format so I started again, and then I see this. Oh well, maybe next time.


Did anyone else immediately think of Audie Murphy? When they made a movie of his life, they actually did portray some of his accomplishments as less than what they really were, to make it more believable for audiences.
"It's easy to forget what a sin is in the middle of a battlefield." "Opposite over hypotenuse, dipshit."

User avatar
A_of_s_t
Posts: 180
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 5:10 am UTC
Contact:

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby A_of_s_t » Fri Jan 20, 2012 5:37 am UTC

I can't tell if this was supposed to be funny or not... There wasn't much of a punchline.

EDIT:

What I mean to say is that the first stick figure says "no one would believe it" and the second one responses by saying that he agrees because the script would be poorly written. It's like they are having two completely different conversations. It's like the second stick figure is responding to the phrase "no one would watch it." But that's not what he said. So I'm a bit perplexed.
Check out my web interzones powered by Web 3.0 technology running on Mozzarella Foxfire:
Spoiler:
Image
Image
Image

User avatar
Djehutynakht
Posts: 1546
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:37 am UTC

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby Djehutynakht » Fri Jan 20, 2012 5:40 am UTC

A_of_s_t wrote:I can't tell if this was supposed to be funny or not... There wasn't much of a punchline.



That's the point.



Indeed... a movie of his life would be boring. Fiction should interest people.

User avatar
Eebster the Great
Posts: 3484
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:58 am UTC
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby Eebster the Great » Fri Jan 20, 2012 5:42 am UTC

A_of_s_t wrote:What I mean to say is that the first stick figure says "no one would believe it" and the second one responses by saying that he agrees because the script would be poorly written. It's like they are having two completely different conversations. It's like the second stick figure is responding to the phrase "no one would watch it." But that's not what he said. So I'm a bit perplexed.

Randall evidently writes sloppy dialog.

bhoot
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:12 am UTC

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby bhoot » Fri Jan 20, 2012 5:46 am UTC

I get the joke, but it really wasn't all that funny. Of course Randall can't be expected to make amazing comics every time, so I'm not complaining much.

User avatar
Brace
Posts: 1169
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 5:40 am UTC
Location: Denver, Co
Contact:

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby Brace » Fri Jan 20, 2012 5:53 am UTC

It seems pretty straightforward to me.

Here, have the parent trope this joke was derived from.
"The future is the only kind of property that the masters willingly concede to the slaves" - Albert Camus

Invisiblemoose
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:15 am UTC

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby Invisiblemoose » Fri Jan 20, 2012 6:03 am UTC

Heh, got a laugh out of me, for whatever reason.

Edit: Oh, I agree "no one would believe it" was the wrong phrase. I read right over that.

User avatar
Kisama
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 5:52 am UTC
Location: (0, 0, 0)

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby Kisama » Fri Jan 20, 2012 6:20 am UTC


Posting tvtropes links should constitute a forum foul, punishable by an amusing forfeit such as having word filters applied to all of the offender's posts.
cd880b726e0a0dbd4237f10d15da46f4

User avatar
Brace
Posts: 1169
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 5:40 am UTC
Location: Denver, Co
Contact:

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby Brace » Fri Jan 20, 2012 6:44 am UTC

Are you sure you're on the right forum?
"The future is the only kind of property that the masters willingly concede to the slaves" - Albert Camus

User avatar
Kisama
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 5:52 am UTC
Location: (0, 0, 0)

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby Kisama » Fri Jan 20, 2012 6:52 am UTC

Brace wrote:Are you sure you're on the right forum?
No, but is 80% confidence good enough?

I don't want tvtrope links banned outright, I just want them to carry a minor cost in exchange for the potential hours wasted by people following those links. I also want to be entertained, and my suggestion would hopefully kill both birds.
cd880b726e0a0dbd4237f10d15da46f4

User avatar
pbnjstowell
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:35 am UTC
Location: Middle of Washington, USA

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby pbnjstowell » Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:16 am UTC

Kisama wrote:
Brace wrote:Are you sure you're on the right forum?
No, but is 80% confidence good enough?

I don't want tvtrope links banned outright, I just want them to carry a minor cost in exchange for the potential hours wasted by people following those links. I also want to be entertained, and my suggestion would hopefully kill both birds.


I second your suggestion. I've had to ban myself from tvtropes. And sometimes Wikipedia, unless I have time to kill. Dangerous!
Never trust a dog with orange eyebrows.

User avatar
Quicksilver
Posts: 437
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 6:21 am UTC

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby Quicksilver » Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:18 am UTC

SpringLoaded12 wrote:Did anyone else immediately think of Audie Murphy? When they made a movie of his life, they actually did portray some of his accomplishments as less than what they really were, to make it more believable for audiences.
I wish I did. Audie Murphy is one of the manliest men ever. I actually thought of Breaking Bad first because I hate the main protagonist and that doesn't change my enjoyment of the show. The guy on the left kind of looks like Aaron Paul too.

LordBritish
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:10 pm UTC

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby LordBritish » Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:15 am UTC

Kisama wrote:I don't want tvtrope links banned outright, I just want them to carry a minor cost in exchange for the potential hours wasted by people following those links. I also want to be entertained, and my suggestion would hopefully kill both birds.


I came back after three tropes. I'm so proud of myself.

Now to something completely different.

What could "technically it wasn't cheating" mean? I call cybersex.
In vacuum, you are no longer a sucker.

now to something completely different: http://demesos.blogspot.com

Kibate
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 8:33 am UTC

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby Kibate » Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:20 am UTC

From what i know(which isn't a lot due to my information coming from tv shows) is that when someone says "technically it wasn't cheating" is when someone is "just" going out with a girl, maybe a slight kiss, but no sex

also agree on the ban of tvtropes links, see you in 5 hours

User avatar
J L
Posts: 242
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:03 am UTC
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby J L » Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:38 am UTC

I thought it was funny. It's a nice twist on the old truth that life sometimes is poorly scripted; for it's not life itself, but individual lives -- and mostly the lives of the exact same people that keep boring you with tales about their "crazy" biographies.

"Unwatchable" is a great response to that ... must remember ...

Istaro
Posts: 101
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:00 pm UTC

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby Istaro » Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:48 am UTC

Kisama wrote:I don't want tvtrope links banned outright, I just want them to carry a minor cost in exchange for the potential hours wasted by people following those links.


I suspect that many (most?) of this forum's denizens have already gotten the initial TVTropes binge out of the way (upon reading http://xkcd.com/609/ if not before then).

User avatar
wlao
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 8:43 am UTC

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby wlao » Fri Jan 20, 2012 1:15 pm UTC

When looking at the left guy, I'm amazed how someone manages to put so much personality into a stick figure.

But again, that may say more about my own prejudice...

User avatar
Sprocket
Seymour
Posts: 5951
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 6:04 pm UTC
Location: impaled on Beck's boney hips.
Contact:

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby Sprocket » Fri Jan 20, 2012 2:03 pm UTC

How did this warrant being made into a comic? Is that the meta joke?
"She’s a free spirit, a wind-rider, she’s at one with nature, and walks with the kodama eidolons”
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Zohar wrote: Down with the hipster binary! It's a SPECTRUM!

User avatar
eculc
Wet Peanut Butter
Posts: 451
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 4:25 am UTC

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby eculc » Fri Jan 20, 2012 2:40 pm UTC

I only went through about 20 links...then again the only reason I stopped was because I'm at school.
Um, this post feels devoid of content. Good luck?
For comparison, that means that if the cabbage guy from Avatar: The Last Airbender filled up his cart with lettuce instead, it would be about a quarter of a lethal dose.

galifixomatosis
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 2:44 pm UTC

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby galifixomatosis » Fri Jan 20, 2012 2:46 pm UTC

Sprocket wrote:How did this warrant being made into a comic? Is that the meta joke?


Let me guess... you have a goatee?

User avatar
Hawknc
Oompa Loompa of SCIENCE!
Posts: 6986
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:14 am UTC
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby Hawknc » Fri Jan 20, 2012 2:51 pm UTC

galifixomatosis wrote:
Sprocket wrote:How did this warrant being made into a comic? Is that the meta joke?


Let me guess... you have a goatee?

I approved this one purely for the lolz.

User avatar
Klear
Posts: 1965
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:43 am UTC
Location: Prague

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby Klear » Fri Jan 20, 2012 2:52 pm UTC

This would be a nice comeback in a conversation. In comic form it's not enough.

And the reply indeed doesn't fit what the guy is saying.

User avatar
CorruptUser
Posts: 10547
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:12 pm UTC

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby CorruptUser » Fri Jan 20, 2012 3:04 pm UTC

I don't get it. Not the joke, I get that, but why people don't get it. The guy is a jackass, and it would be painful to watch him try to talk for 2 hours.

(And where I'm from, "technically not cheating" means, *ahem*, fingerwork).

gdyetrauda
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 3:20 pm UTC

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby gdyetrauda » Fri Jan 20, 2012 3:13 pm UTC

My brain immediately went "Nice! A comic about how worthless Tucker Max is!"

DVC
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 5:20 am UTC

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby DVC » Fri Jan 20, 2012 3:18 pm UTC

Well, I was completely confused. The title had me thinking of Stranger than Fiction which was simply brilliant, and Will Ferrel was great in it. It seemed like Randal and I had watched two different films. Turns out we had.

User avatar
addams
Posts: 10325
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 4:44 am UTC
Location: Oregon Coast: 97444

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby addams » Fri Jan 20, 2012 3:48 pm UTC

LordBritish wrote:
Kisama wrote:I don't want tvtrope links banned outright, I just want them to carry a minor cost in exchange for the potential hours wasted by people following those links. I also want to be entertained, and my suggestion would hopefully kill both birds.


I came back after three tropes. I'm so proud of myself.

Now to something completely different.

What could "technically it wasn't cheating" mean? I call cybersex.

Seconded.
One more and it passes.

Then, we can all get back to doing NOTHING!
Life is, just, an exchange of electrons; It is up to us to give it meaning.

We are all in The Gutter.
Some of us see The Gutter.
Some of us see The Stars.
by mr. Oscar Wilde.

Those that want to Know; Know.
Those that do not Know; Don't tell them.
They do terrible things to people that Tell Them.

Ronsonic
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 4:29 pm UTC

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby Ronsonic » Fri Jan 20, 2012 3:56 pm UTC

SpringLoaded12 wrote:Did anyone else immediately think of Audie Murphy? When they made a movie of his life, they actually did portray some of his accomplishments as less than what they really were, to make it more believable for audiences.


Audie Murphy was a certifiable badass and a damn good actor. One of the few to ever exceed the 1000milliBronson threshold.

(And where I'm from, "technically not cheating" means, *ahem*, "cheating.")

User avatar
TheMaskedGecko
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 10:20 am UTC
Location: Wales,UK

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby TheMaskedGecko » Fri Jan 20, 2012 4:06 pm UTC

I read "wouldn't believe it" as a pun on two of that phrases meanings (the straight up ,you would not believe the day I've had" and the specific ,you wouldn't believe how crap that film is'. It made sense to me.

Hmm, who was it that said that dissecting jokes is like dissecting frogs: noones that interested and the joke dies. They spoke much truth.

Re: technical cheating. An example from some of my friends: imagine, if you will, two people [A and B] having a long term relationship but momentarily separated over something trivial. A third person [C] enters the scene, perhaps at a party, possibly elsewhere, and seeks carnal knowledge of B. What they're doing is not technically cheating but the Facebook bitching community agrees that it is de facto cheating (or to quote verbatim: "Oh me yarm, what a slimer. shes [sic] such a slut")
It occurs to me that this is more specific to the teenage world in which I reside.
ConMan wrote:the neighbourhood’s favourite lizard

Yeah, I don't care if it's out of context, it massages my ego and so it stays.

User avatar
Steve the Pocket
Posts: 707
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 4:02 am UTC
Location: Going downtuuu in a Luleelurah!

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby Steve the Pocket » Fri Jan 20, 2012 4:24 pm UTC

Huh. I got a completely different vibe out of it: Guy #1 is a jerk who blames his "crazy" ex for relationship problems that are his fault (Questionable Content did a strip that commented on the phenomenon of men calling their girlfriends/ex-girlfriends "crazy", but I can't be assed to hunt it down at the moment; suffice it to say the writer does not approve), and Guy #2 uses the "movie" comment as a set-up to call him out for it in that clever, indirect way that usually merits a response of "Yeah... HEY!"
cephalopod9 wrote:Only on Xkcd can you start a topic involving Hitler and people spend the better part of half a dozen pages arguing about the quality of Operating Systems.

Baige.

User avatar
synack
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 4:54 pm UTC

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby synack » Fri Jan 20, 2012 4:57 pm UTC

Any way we could change the title to include a word at the end that starts with 'U'? Then it would share its acronym with something many of us are often thinking when talking with a guy like this.

AndrewGPaul
Posts: 69
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 5:02 pm UTC

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby AndrewGPaul » Fri Jan 20, 2012 5:09 pm UTC

I just thought that the beardless fellow was implying that beardy man's life wasn't nearly as exciting or unusual as he thinks it is.

fauxmo
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 5:02 pm UTC

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby fauxmo » Fri Jan 20, 2012 5:31 pm UTC

This is the first comic in a while that I've actually laughed at - sometimes it's nice to see a nice snappy retort and not the usual over-intellectualised or meme-based stuff. The difficulty most people seem to have is that they can't grasp that "believe" isn't being used in the literal context; as TheMaskedGecko said, it's a pun: when a critic reviews a show and says the characters aren't believable, they mean things such as the dialogue is poor, the protagonist is unlikeable, etc.

A_of_s_t wrote:What I mean to say is that the first stick figure says "no one would believe it" and the second one responses by saying that he agrees because the script would be poorly written. It's like they are having two completely different conversations. It's like the second stick figure is responding to the phrase "no one would watch it." But that's not what he said. So I'm a bit perplexed.

User avatar
A_of_s_t
Posts: 180
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 5:10 am UTC
Contact:

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby A_of_s_t » Fri Jan 20, 2012 5:32 pm UTC

Klear wrote:This would be a nice comeback in a conversation. In comic form it's not enough.

And the reply indeed doesn't fit what the guy is saying.

I'm glad I'm not the only one that thinks this.
Check out my web interzones powered by Web 3.0 technology running on Mozzarella Foxfire:
Spoiler:
Image
Image
Image

User avatar
fearless
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 2:49 pm UTC
Location: Cape Town
Contact:

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby fearless » Fri Jan 20, 2012 6:11 pm UTC

TheMaskedGecko wrote:I read "wouldn't believe it" as a pun on two of that phrases meanings (the straight up ,you would not believe the day I've had" and the specific ,you wouldn't believe how crap that film is'. It made sense to me.


This is exactly how I understand it! ie - why would any film producer spend money making a film that has poor dialogue and a despicable main character? Sounds like a porno. (The despicable character being the person with the penis)

User avatar
TheMaskedGecko
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 10:20 am UTC
Location: Wales,UK

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby TheMaskedGecko » Fri Jan 20, 2012 6:33 pm UTC

fearless wrote: (The despicable character being the person with the penis)

Good rule for life there folks: Person possessing a penis=despicable

No, I do see what your saying, although I'm struggling to think of a 'real' film that matches these criteria. The best I can come up with is Clash of the Titans with its poor dialogue and one dimensional main character.
ConMan wrote:the neighbourhood’s favourite lizard

Yeah, I don't care if it's out of context, it massages my ego and so it stays.

User avatar
fearless
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 2:49 pm UTC
Location: Cape Town
Contact:

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby fearless » Fri Jan 20, 2012 6:48 pm UTC

TheMaskedGecko wrote:
fearless wrote: (The despicable character being the person with the penis)

Good rule for life there folks: Person possessing a penis=despicable


lol i wasn't being sexist, I swear. It's just that the guys all seem to be on steroids and they don't even show the faces half the time. It's hard to love such a character...

User avatar
TheMaskedGecko
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 10:20 am UTC
Location: Wales,UK

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby TheMaskedGecko » Fri Jan 20, 2012 6:53 pm UTC

...and yet those women seem to manage it. The reason for this is probably that any porn with relateable, likable characters gets upgraded to art.
ConMan wrote:the neighbourhood’s favourite lizard

Yeah, I don't care if it's out of context, it massages my ego and so it stays.

User avatar
PolakoVoador
Posts: 1028
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 11:11 pm UTC
Location: Brazil

Re: 1006: "Sloppier Than Fiction"

Postby PolakoVoador » Fri Jan 20, 2012 6:54 pm UTC

Great, I just lost almost 2h on TvTropes. And I'm at work. Curse you, Internet!


Return to “Individual XKCD Comic Threads”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alexa [Bot] and 51 guests