
1190: "Time"
Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates
Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"

If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family Anatidae on our hands. –Douglas Adams
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
]
Though reading 'Proto-Indo-European' that many times was kinda fun, spoiler this please. It's waay too damn long.
[/quote]chem1190c wrote:Just to prove to myself that I've retained my sanity despite the last couple of pages of babycancer fonts, I be now going to copy/paste wikipedia's article on "Proto-Indo-European" into a quote box for no apparent reason:
<snip this proto-indo-european bullshit>
I DID IT FOR THE LULZ
YOLOLOLZ
Ïa Ran'dall! Ïa Chulhu!
Though reading 'Proto-Indo-European' that many times was kinda fun, spoiler this please. It's waay too damn long.
Last edited by HAL9000 on Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:32 am UTC, edited 2 times in total.
HAL9000 wrote:I find it simultaneously fascinating and disturbing that the most profound things I've read in the past months I have encountered in or been led to by an internet forum thread about a webcomic.
- KarMann
- As far as the hats go, I think it's safe to say that I'm pretty well set. Unless my hat, pre-dating Time itself, needs a hat of its own??
- Posts: 916
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:38 am UTC
- Location: Tucson, AZ, USA, far from river and sea
- Contact:
Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"
Oh, yeah:
Edit: ninjaed again
Spoiler:
Edit: ninjaed again
P.S. I am Randall, but not that Randall.
We can rebuild it. We have the technology. We can make it better than it was. Better … stronger … well, maybe not faster.
Well, BlitzGirl is experiencing a bit of a title wave.
We can rebuild it. We have the technology. We can make it better than it was. Better … stronger … well, maybe not faster.
Well, BlitzGirl is experiencing a bit of a title wave.
Illud expecto, ergo sum.Magdiragdag wrote:I wait for it, therefore I am.
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
Dark Avorian wrote:I be not sure the M A D N E S S hath ever been quite so...ehm...literally RECKONED.
I have a feeling we are far from reaching bottom.
I mean Megan just started building, she is fast unlike that snail Cueball, I reckon a few of y'all good folks will stay awake to see what happens.
Helper wrote:Dear god, even the recursion is recursing.
- KarMann
- As far as the hats go, I think it's safe to say that I'm pretty well set. Unless my hat, pre-dating Time itself, needs a hat of its own??
- Posts: 916
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:38 am UTC
- Location: Tucson, AZ, USA, far from river and sea
- Contact:
Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"
So, what's Cueball up to out of frame this time? It doesn't look like he's doing something with the trebuchet, unless maybe fetching ammo for it.
A cow, maybe? A large wooden rabbit?
A cow, maybe? A large wooden rabbit?
Last edited by KarMann on Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:34 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.
P.S. I am Randall, but not that Randall.
We can rebuild it. We have the technology. We can make it better than it was. Better … stronger … well, maybe not faster.
Well, BlitzGirl is experiencing a bit of a title wave.
We can rebuild it. We have the technology. We can make it better than it was. Better … stronger … well, maybe not faster.
Well, BlitzGirl is experiencing a bit of a title wave.
Illud expecto, ergo sum.Magdiragdag wrote:I wait for it, therefore I am.
- ChronosDragon
- Posts: 1851
- Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:42 am UTC
- Location: [~]
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
diego5wh wrote:Dark Avorian wrote:I be not sure the M A D N E S S hath ever been quite so...ehm...literally reckon-did.
I have a feeling we be far from reaching bottom.
I mean Megan just started building, she be fast unlike that snail Cueball, I reckon a few of y'all good folks woll stay awake to see hwæt happens.
Friday night, no reason to hallucinocoma
No reason at all
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
buffygirl wrote:HAL9000 wrote:Dude, spoiler the wikipedia article. Seriously.
AWWWWW, platonic squeezes! you be trying to catch up in a purist manner, be not you? sooooo sweet! You get on with your bad self....
WAIT - does "spoiler" now mean "hide" and/or "save space" and/or "spare others the details of which they don't really care"??? Where on earth --I mean NewPixLand-- have I been?
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 2:38 am UTC
- Location: In the shadow of the One True Comic
Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"
Hey Guiz, I haz an adea for a mastur trollz! Let's copy Wikipedia articles into the forum's editing and then copy the changed articles back into Wikipedia!
All hail divine Lord Randall
Author of the One True Comic
Illustrator of Sandcastles
Keeper of the Newpix
Creator of Time
We have seen the Castles
We reject the Outside
We watch Time
We do not rest
We Wait For It
Author of the One True Comic
Illustrator of Sandcastles
Keeper of the Newpix
Creator of Time
We have seen the Castles
We reject the Outside
We watch Time
We do not rest
We Wait For It
ChronosDragon wrote:The One True Comic is absolute, it is usually reality that is inaccurate.
Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"
Megan continues to rebuild the destroyed.
Where on Earth is Cueball? Is there yet another part of the castle?
Where on Earth is Cueball? Is there yet another part of the castle?
George Carlin wrote:Think of how stupid a average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 6:54 am UTC
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
buffygirl wrote:buffygirl wrote:HAL9000 wrote:Dude, spoiler the wikipedia article. Seriously.
AWWWWW, platonic squeezes! you be trying to catch up in a purist manner, be not you? sooooo sweet! You get on with your bad self....
WAIT - doth "spoiler" now mean "hide" and/or "save space" and/or "spare others the details of which they don't really care"??? Where on earth --I mean NewPixLand-- have I been?
It means to put it in spoiler tags to hide it unless you click on it to view it.
- KarMann
- As far as the hats go, I think it's safe to say that I'm pretty well set. Unless my hat, pre-dating Time itself, needs a hat of its own??
- Posts: 916
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:38 am UTC
- Location: Tucson, AZ, USA, far from river and sea
- Contact:
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
buffygirl wrote:buffygirl wrote:HAL9000 wrote:Dude, spoiler the wikipedia article. Seriously.
AWWWWW, platonic squeezes! you be trying to catch up in a purist manner, be not you? sooooo sweet! You get on with your bad self....
WAIT - doth "spoiler" now mean "hide" and/or "save space" and/or "spare others the details of which they don't really care"??? Where on earth --I mean NewPixLand-- have I been?
Spoiler:
Last edited by KarMann on Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:44 am UTC, edited 2 times in total.
P.S. I am Randall, but not that Randall.
We can rebuild it. We have the technology. We can make it better than it was. Better … stronger … well, maybe not faster.
Well, BlitzGirl is experiencing a bit of a title wave.
We can rebuild it. We have the technology. We can make it better than it was. Better … stronger … well, maybe not faster.
Well, BlitzGirl is experiencing a bit of a title wave.
Illud expecto, ergo sum.Magdiragdag wrote:I wait for it, therefore I am.
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
Wraithlord wrote:Hey Guiz, I haz an adea for a mastur trollz! Let's copy Wikipedia articles into the forum's editing and then copy the changed articles back into Wikipedia!
Sure you'll get banned on wiki.
George Carlin wrote:Think of how stupid a average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
ChronosDragon wrote:Friday night, no reason to hallucinocoma
No reason at all
absolutely none.
buffygirl wrote:buffygirl wrote:HAL9000 wrote:Dude, spoiler the wikipedia article. Seriously.
AWWWWW, platonic squeezes! you be trying to catch up in a purist manner, be not you? sooooo sweet! You get on with your bad self....
WAIT - doth "spoiler" now mean "hide" and/or "save space" and/or "spare others the details of which they don't really care"??? Where on earth --I mean NewPixLand-- have I been?
in this case, save space. I think there's something about walls of text.
HAL9000 wrote:I find it simultaneously fascinating and disturbing that the most profound things I've read in the past months I have encountered in or been led to by an internet forum thread about a webcomic.
- beargarden
- Cardinal
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:34 pm UTC
Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"
I can't keep up with this. Today is going to be filled with too many outsider commitments.
If the vote for pope is held within the next 24 timeframes,
I VOTE FOR WHOEVER peewee_RotA VOTES FOR as it was he who ordained me as Cardinal.
If peewee_RotA doesn't vote, I vote for him.
If the vote for pope is held within the next 24 timeframes,
I VOTE FOR WHOEVER peewee_RotA VOTES FOR as it was he who ordained me as Cardinal.
If peewee_RotA doesn't vote, I vote for him.
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
KarMann wrote:So, hwæt's Cueball up to out of frame this Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!? It doth not look like he be doing something with the catapult, unless maybe fetching ammo for it.
A cow, maybe? A large wooden rabbit?
I bet it's the aforementioned SCBCBOI
StratPlayer wrote:Ah yes -- Vinnie Longdong. I believe he retired. Now he owns a strip club in New Jersey...
BA-DA-BING!!!
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
boozledorf wrote:buffygirl wrote:buffygirl wrote:HAL9000 wrote:Dude, spoiler the wikipedia article. Seriously.
AWWWWW, platonic squeezes! you be trying to catch up in a purist manner, be not you? sooooo sweet! You get on with your bad self....
WAIT - doth "spoiler" now mean "hide" and/or "save space" and/or "spare others the details of which they don't really care"??? Where on earth --I mean NewPixLand-- have I been?
It means to put it in spoiler tags to hide it unless you click on it to view it.
Yah -- but once upon a time it meant "about to giveaway plot details you might not want to know, or other stuff that might distress you or something." Right"?
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 6:54 am UTC
Re: 1190: "Time"
In all seriousness, though, what's the deal with the filters?
Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"
Actually do we really need a pope? I'll go for community-base.
George Carlin wrote:Think of how stupid a average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
buffygirl wrote:boozledorf wrote:buffygirl wrote:buffygirl wrote:HAL9000 wrote:Dude, spoiler the wikipedia article. Seriously.
AWWWWW, platonic squeezes! you be trying to catch up in a purist manner, be not you? sooooo sweet! You get on with your bad self....
WAIT - doth "spoiler" now mean "hide" and/or "save space" and/or "spare others the details of which they don't really care"??? Where on earth --I mean NewPixLand-- have I been?
It means to put it in spoiler tags to hide it unless you click on it to view it.
Yah -- but once upon a Things that are on my side for 600, Alex! it meant "about to giveaway plot details you may-did not want to ken, or other stuff that may-did distress you or something." Right"?
it still means that.. we are just misusing the spoiler tags to avoid walltext thingys
Helper wrote:Dear god, even the recursion is recursing.
- KarMann
- As far as the hats go, I think it's safe to say that I'm pretty well set. Unless my hat, pre-dating Time itself, needs a hat of its own??
- Posts: 916
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:38 am UTC
- Location: Tucson, AZ, USA, far from river and sea
- Contact:
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
buffygirl wrote:boozledorf wrote:buffygirl wrote:buffygirl wrote:HAL9000 wrote:Dude, spoiler the wikipedia article. Seriously.
AWWWWW, platonic squeezes! you be trying to catch up in a purist manner, be not you? sooooo sweet! You get on with your bad self....
WAIT - doth "spoiler" now mean "hide" and/or "save space" and/or "spare others the details of which they don't really care"??? Where on earth --I mean NewPixLand-- have I been?
It means to put it in spoiler tags to hide it unless you click on it to view it.
Yah -- but once upon a Things that are on my side for 600, Alex! it meant "about to giveaway plot details you may-did not want to ken, or other stuff that may-did distress you or something." Right"?
</madness>
OK, kidding about car parts aside, yes, but the tag that was designed to hide such spoilers until you take an action to see them is also the easiest way to hide things that you might want hidden for other reasons, like size or redundancy. So, that's how they get used here.
<madness>
P.S. I am Randall, but not that Randall.
We can rebuild it. We have the technology. We can make it better than it was. Better … stronger … well, maybe not faster.
Well, BlitzGirl is experiencing a bit of a title wave.
We can rebuild it. We have the technology. We can make it better than it was. Better … stronger … well, maybe not faster.
Well, BlitzGirl is experiencing a bit of a title wave.
Illud expecto, ergo sum.Magdiragdag wrote:I wait for it, therefore I am.
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
buffygirl wrote:boozledorf wrote:buffygirl wrote:buffygirl wrote:HAL9000 wrote:Dude, spoiler the wikipedia article. Seriously.
AWWWWW, platonic squeezes! you be trying to catch up in a purist manner, be not you? sooooo sweet! You get on with your bad self....
WAIT - doth "spoiler" now mean "hide" and/or "save space" and/or "spare others the details of which they don't really care"??? Where on earth --I mean NewPixLand-- have I been?
It means to put it in spoiler tags to hide it unless you click on it to view it.
Yah -- but once upon a Things that are on my side for 600, Alex! it meant "about to giveaway plot details you may-did not want to ken, or other stuff that may-did distress you or something." Right"?
Sounds like a fairytale to me.
StratPlayer wrote:Ah yes -- Vinnie Longdong. I believe he retired. Now he owns a strip club in New Jersey...
BA-DA-BING!!!
Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"
boozledorf wrote:In all seriousness, though, hwæt's the deal with the Zul-Gurub?
http://xkcd-time.wikia.com/wiki/The_Madness
Helper wrote:Dear god, even the recursion is recursing.
-
- Posts: 546
- Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:48 pm UTC
Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"
It's that time of year again. Check the calendars. There is a wonderful holiday approachin' and not the one with the creepy rodent.
The 62-foot tall statue of Jesus constructed out of styrofoam, wood and fiberglass resin caught on fire after the right hand of the statue was struck by lightning.
meatyochre wrote:And yea, verily the forums crowd spake: "Teehee!"
Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"
boozledorf wrote:In all seriousness, though, hwæt's the deal with the Zul-Gurub?
Dude/tte, go to the wiki http://xkcd-time.wikia.com/wiki/The_Madness. It's the Reckoning, the M.a.d.n.e.s.s viewtopic.php?f=7&t=101106.
Kay?
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
KarMann wrote:buffygirl wrote:boozledorf wrote:buffygirl wrote:buffygirl wrote:HAL9000 wrote:Dude, spoiler the wikipedia article. Seriously.
AWWWWW, platonic squeezes! you be trying to catch up in a purist manner, be not you? sooooo sweet! You get on with your bad self....
WAIT - doth "spoiler" now mean "hide" and/or "save space" and/or "spare others the details of which they don't really care"??? Where on earth --I mean NewPixLand-- have I been?
It means to put it in spoiler tags to hide it unless you click on it to view it.
Yah -- but once upon a Things that be on my side for 600, Alex! it meant "about to giveaway plot details you may-did not want to ken, or other stuff that may-did distress you or something." Right"?
</RECKONING>
all correct, kidding about car parts aside, yes, but the tag that be-did designed to hide such spoilers until you take an action to see them be also the easiest way to hide things that you may-did want hidden for other reasons, like size or redundancy. So, that be how they get wield-did here.
<RECKONING>
*pouts,* well that's just stupid. It's a misuse of spoiler-ed-ness. SPOILER-ABUSE! SPOILER-ABUSE!
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
Because we haven't had one in a long time
Latest frame (auto updates):
Live updating GIF:More complex program (with manual controls and a soundtrack!(:
Explain XKCD (with a little more discussion on the comic, when the servers tin take it):
Wiki
http://xkcd-time.wikia.com/wiki/XKCD_Time_Wiki
Spoiler:
A bump of the important parts of this small sequence of programmed instructions
Please continue Bumping
Please continue Bumping
Latest frame (auto updates):
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
http://xkcd-time.wikia.com/wiki/XKCD_Time_Wiki
Helper wrote:Dear god, even the recursion is recursing.
- KarMann
- As far as the hats go, I think it's safe to say that I'm pretty well set. Unless my hat, pre-dating Time itself, needs a hat of its own??
- Posts: 916
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:38 am UTC
- Location: Tucson, AZ, USA, far from river and sea
- Contact:
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
Dark Avorian wrote:it be that Things that are on my side for 600, Alex! of year again. Check the calendars. There be a wonderful holiday approachin' and not the one with the creepy rodent.
Lagomorph! Not rodent; you're thinking of Christmas, when you have those big rodents with the antlers pulling the sleigh.
P.S. I am Randall, but not that Randall.
We can rebuild it. We have the technology. We can make it better than it was. Better … stronger … well, maybe not faster.
Well, BlitzGirl is experiencing a bit of a title wave.
We can rebuild it. We have the technology. We can make it better than it was. Better … stronger … well, maybe not faster.
Well, BlitzGirl is experiencing a bit of a title wave.
Illud expecto, ergo sum.Magdiragdag wrote:I wait for it, therefore I am.
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
diego5wh wrote: (with a little more discussion on the comic, when the servers tin take it)
Wait... Tin? Can't we write can now?
If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family Anatidae on our hands. –Douglas Adams
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
buffygirl wrote:KarMann wrote:buffygirl wrote:boozledorf wrote:buffygirl wrote:buffygirl wrote:HAL9000 wrote:Dude, spoiler the wikipedia article. Seriously.
AWWWWW, platonic squeezes! you be trying to catch up in a purist manner, be not you? sooooo sweet! You get on with your bad self....
WAIT - doth "spoiler" now mean "hide" and/or "save space" and/or "spare others the details of which they don't really care"??? Where on earth --I mean NewPixLand-- have I been?
It means to put it in spoiler tags to hide it unless you click on it to view it.
Yah -- but once upon a Things that be on my side for 600, Alex! it meant "about to giveaway plot details you may-did not want to ken, or other stuff that may-did distress you or something." Right"?
</RECKONING>
all correct, kidding about car parts aside, yes, but the tag that be-did designed to hide such spoilers until you take an action to see them be also the easiest way to hide things that you may-did want hidden for other reasons, like size or redundancy. So, that be how they get wield-did here.
<RECKONING>
*pouts,* well that be just stupid. it be a misuse of spoiler-ed-ness. SPOILER-ABUSE! SPOILER-ABUSE!

StratPlayer wrote:Ah yes -- Vinnie Longdong. I believe he retired. Now he owns a strip club in New Jersey...
BA-DA-BING!!!
Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"
I hate to ask a stupid question but did they accidentally trebuchet themselves few newpix ago?
HAL9000 wrote:Everyone whose posts are on this specific page so far who has a signature has included at least one thing from this thread as a whole in their sig.
Helper wrote:I was aware. But then I forgot. And now I'm aware again.
AionArap wrote:And +1 for Randalicitness
- KarMann
- As far as the hats go, I think it's safe to say that I'm pretty well set. Unless my hat, pre-dating Time itself, needs a hat of its own??
- Posts: 916
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:38 am UTC
- Location: Tucson, AZ, USA, far from river and sea
- Contact:
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
buffygirl wrote:KarMann wrote:buffygirl wrote:boozledorf wrote:buffygirl wrote:buffygirl wrote:HAL9000 wrote:Dude, spoiler the wikipedia article. Seriously.
AWWWWW, platonic squeezes! you be trying to catch up in a purist manner, be not you? sooooo sweet! You get on with your bad self....
WAIT - doth "spoiler" now mean "hide" and/or "save space" and/or "spare others the details of which they don't really care"??? Where on earth --I mean NewPixLand-- have I been?
It means to put it in spoiler tags to hide it unless you click on it to view it.
Yah -- but once upon a Things that be on my side for 600, Alex! it meant "about to giveaway plot details you may-did not want to ken, or other stuff that may-did distress you or something." Right"?
</RECKONING>
all correct, kidding about car parts aside, yes, but the tag that be-did designed to hide such spoilers until you take an action to see them be also the easiest way to hide things that you may-did want hidden for other reasons, like size or redundancy. So, that be how they get wield-did here.
<RECKONING>
*pouts,* well that be just stupid. it be a misuse of spoiler-ed-ness. SPOILER-ABUSE! SPOILER-ABUSE!
Yes, it did occur to me in writing that that it's much like the difference between the old days of using HTML to make things look the way you want, and the newer way of using HTML to indicate what you mean, and CSS to make it look right. This use of spoilers being akin to the old HTML way, of course.
P.S. I am Randall, but not that Randall.
We can rebuild it. We have the technology. We can make it better than it was. Better … stronger … well, maybe not faster.
Well, BlitzGirl is experiencing a bit of a title wave.
We can rebuild it. We have the technology. We can make it better than it was. Better … stronger … well, maybe not faster.
Well, BlitzGirl is experiencing a bit of a title wave.
Illud expecto, ergo sum.Magdiragdag wrote:I wait for it, therefore I am.
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
patzer wrote:diego5wh wrote: (with a little more discussion on the comic, when the servers tin take it)
Wait... Tin? tin't we write tin now?
I quoted that thing to make it easier, I clearly didn't proof read..
Helper wrote:Dear god, even the recursion is recursing.
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
swey wrote:I hate to ask a stupid question but did they accidentally catapult themselves few fortnight ago?
They came pretty close.
StratPlayer wrote:Ah yes -- Vinnie Longdong. I believe he retired. Now he owns a strip club in New Jersey...
BA-DA-BING!!!
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 2:38 am UTC
- Location: In the shadow of the One True Comic
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
patzer wrote:diego5wh wrote: (with a little more discussion on the comic, when the servers tin take it)
Wait... Tin? tin't we write tin now?
I suppose we tinnot until we tinunderstand thee RECKONING.
Ïa Ran'dall! Ïa Chulhu!
All hail divine Lord Randall
Author of the One True Comic
Illustrator of Sandcastles
Keeper of the Newpix
Creator of Time
We have seen the Castles
We reject the Outside
We watch Time
We do not rest
We Wait For It
Author of the One True Comic
Illustrator of Sandcastles
Keeper of the Newpix
Creator of Time
We have seen the Castles
We reject the Outside
We watch Time
We do not rest
We Wait For It
ChronosDragon wrote:The One True Comic is absolute, it is usually reality that is inaccurate.
Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"
Actually I'm confused by the filters. It seems sometimes they work and sometimes they don't. 

George Carlin wrote:Think of how stupid a average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
swey wrote:I hate to ask a stupid question but did they accidentally catapult themselves few fortnight ago?
That sounds way more awesome that it should.. *Megan and cueball fly above the castle and land in the ocean of coffecancerbabies*
Helper wrote:Dear god, even the recursion is recursing.
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 2:38 am UTC
- Location: In the shadow of the One True Comic
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
GeoffreyY wrote:Actually I be confused by the Zul-Gurub. It seems sometimes they work and sometimes they don't.
The Zul-Gurub work when they please, they have equal opportunity employment.
Ïa Ran'dall! Ïa Chulhu!
All hail divine Lord Randall
Author of the One True Comic
Illustrator of Sandcastles
Keeper of the Newpix
Creator of Time
We have seen the Castles
We reject the Outside
We watch Time
We do not rest
We Wait For It
Author of the One True Comic
Illustrator of Sandcastles
Keeper of the Newpix
Creator of Time
We have seen the Castles
We reject the Outside
We watch Time
We do not rest
We Wait For It
ChronosDragon wrote:The One True Comic is absolute, it is usually reality that is inaccurate.
- KarMann
- As far as the hats go, I think it's safe to say that I'm pretty well set. Unless my hat, pre-dating Time itself, needs a hat of its own??
- Posts: 916
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:38 am UTC
- Location: Tucson, AZ, USA, far from river and sea
- Contact:
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
AionArap wrote:buffygirl wrote:KarMann wrote:buffygirl wrote:boozledorf wrote:buffygirl wrote:buffygirl wrote:HAL9000 wrote:Dude, spoiler the wikipedia article. Seriously.
AWWWWW, platonic squeezes! you be trying to catch up in a purist manner, be not you? sooooo sweet! You get on with your bad self....
WAIT - doth "spoiler" now mean "hide" and/or "save space" and/or "spare others the details of which they don't really care"??? Where on earth --I mean NewPixLand-- have I been?
It means to put it in spoiler tags to hide it unless you click on it to view it.
Yah -- but once upon a Things that be on my side for 600, Alex! it meant "about to giveaway plot details you may-did not want to ken, or other stuff that may-did distress you or something." Right"?
</RECKONING>
all correct, kidding about car parts aside, yes, but the tag that be-did designed to hide such spoilers until you take an action to see them be also the easiest way to hide things that you may-did want hidden for other reasons, like size or redundancy. So, that be how they get wield-did here.
<RECKONING>
*pouts,* well that be just stupid. it be a misuse of spoiler-ed-ness. SPOILER-ABUSE! SPOILER-ABUSE!
Good point. The one I posted was just a spoiler; you went beyond the call, and showed us spoiler abuse.
P.S. I am Randall, but not that Randall.
We can rebuild it. We have the technology. We can make it better than it was. Better … stronger … well, maybe not faster.
Well, BlitzGirl is experiencing a bit of a title wave.
We can rebuild it. We have the technology. We can make it better than it was. Better … stronger … well, maybe not faster.
Well, BlitzGirl is experiencing a bit of a title wave.
Illud expecto, ergo sum.Magdiragdag wrote:I wait for it, therefore I am.
Re: 1190: "Things that be on my side for 600, Alex!"
swey wrote:I hate to ask a stupid question but did they accidentally catapult themselves few fortnight ago?
Checked few times. Nope.
George Carlin wrote:Think of how stupid a average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
Re: 1190: "Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!"
New comic frame in 1 boing!
Last edited by Helper on Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:59 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.
NoEdge wrote:Outside? Is that like Mesopotamia? Isn't Mesopotamia gone? Has Outside been destroyed without our noticing?!
Oh well. At least we still have our sandcastle.
NoEdge wrote:Maybe it's fire. The world is burning. It's dark behind me. Maybe the fires have been put out. Maybe it's all gone.
Return to “Individual XKCD Comic Threads”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests