1190: "Time"

HAL9000 · Postby **HAL9000** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:30 am UTC

]

chem1190c wrote:Just to prove to myself that I've retained my sanity despite the last couple of pages of babycancer fonts, I be now going to copy/paste wikipedia's article on "Proto-Indo-European" into a quote box for no apparent reason:

<snip this proto-indo-european bullshit>

I DID IT FOR THE LULZ

YOLOLOLZ

Ïa Ran'dall! Ïa Chulhu!

[/quote]
Though reading 'Proto-Indo-European' that many times was kinda fun, spoiler this please. It's waay too damn long.

KarMann · Postby **KarMann** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:31 am UTC

Oh, yeah:

Spoiler:

Edit: ninjaed again

diego5wh · Postby **diego5wh** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:34 am UTC

Dark Avorian wrote:I be not sure the M A D N E S S hath ever been quite so...ehm...literally RECKONED.

I have a feeling we are far from reaching bottom.
I mean Megan just started building, she is fast unlike that snail Cueball, I reckon a few of y'all good folks will stay awake to see what happens.

KarMann · Postby **KarMann** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:34 am UTC

So, what's Cueball up to out of frame this time? It doesn't look like he's doing something with the trebuchet, unless maybe fetching ammo for it.

A cow, maybe? A large wooden rabbit?

ChronosDragon · Postby **ChronosDragon** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:34 am UTC

diego5wh wrote:
Dark Avorian wrote:I be not sure the M A D N E S S hath ever been quite so...ehm...literally reckon-did.

I have a feeling we be far from reaching bottom.
I mean Megan just started building, she be fast unlike that snail Cueball, I reckon a few of y'all good folks woll stay awake to see hwæt happens.

Friday night, no reason to hallucinocoma

No reason at all

buffygirl · Postby **buffygirl** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:35 am UTC

buffygirl wrote:
HAL9000 wrote:Dude, spoiler the wikipedia article. Seriously.

AWWWWW, platonic squeezes! you be trying to catch up in a purist manner, be not you? sooooo sweet! You get on with your bad self....

WAIT - does "spoiler" now mean "hide" and/or "save space" and/or "spare others the details of which they don't really care"??? Where on earth --I mean NewPixLand-- have I been?

Wraithlord · Postby **Wraithlord** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:35 am UTC

Hey Guiz, I haz an adea for a mastur trollz! Let's copy Wikipedia articles into the forum's editing and then copy the changed articles back into Wikipedia!

GeoffreyY · Postby **GeoffreyY** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:36 am UTC

Megan continues to rebuild the destroyed.
Where on Earth is Cueball? Is there yet another part of the castle?

boozledorf · Postby **boozledorf** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:36 am UTC

buffygirl wrote:
buffygirl wrote:
HAL9000 wrote:Dude, spoiler the wikipedia article. Seriously.

AWWWWW, platonic squeezes! you be trying to catch up in a purist manner, be not you? sooooo sweet! You get on with your bad self....

WAIT - doth "spoiler" now mean "hide" and/or "save space" and/or "spare others the details of which they don't really care"??? Where on earth --I mean NewPixLand-- have I been?

It means to put it in spoiler tags to hide it unless you click on it to view it.

KarMann · Postby **KarMann** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:37 am UTC

buffygirl wrote:
buffygirl wrote:
HAL9000 wrote:Dude, spoiler the wikipedia article. Seriously.

AWWWWW, platonic squeezes! you be trying to catch up in a purist manner, be not you? sooooo sweet! You get on with your bad self....

WAIT - doth "spoiler" now mean "hide" and/or "save space" and/or "spare others the details of which they don't really care"??? Where on earth --I mean NewPixLand-- have I been?

Spoiler:

GeoffreyY · Postby **GeoffreyY** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:37 am UTC

Wraithlord wrote:Hey Guiz, I haz an adea for a mastur trollz! Let's copy Wikipedia articles into the forum's editing and then copy the changed articles back into Wikipedia!

Sure you'll get banned on wiki.

HAL9000 · Postby **HAL9000** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:37 am UTC

ChronosDragon wrote:Friday night, no reason to hallucinocoma

No reason at all

absolutely none.

buffygirl wrote:
buffygirl wrote:
HAL9000 wrote:Dude, spoiler the wikipedia article. Seriously.

AWWWWW, platonic squeezes! you be trying to catch up in a purist manner, be not you? sooooo sweet! You get on with your bad self....

WAIT - doth "spoiler" now mean "hide" and/or "save space" and/or "spare others the details of which they don't really care"??? Where on earth --I mean NewPixLand-- have I been?

in this case, save space. I think there's something about walls of text.

beargarden · Postby **beargarden** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:38 am UTC

I can't keep up with this. Today is going to be filled with too many outsider commitments.

If the vote for pope is held within the next 24 timeframes,
I VOTE FOR WHOEVER peewee_RotA VOTES FOR as it was he who ordained me as Cardinal.
If peewee_RotA doesn't vote, I vote for him.

AionArap · Postby **AionArap** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:40 am UTC

KarMann wrote:So, hwæt's Cueball up to out of frame this Things that are on my side for 600, Alex!? It doth not look like he be doing something with the catapult, unless maybe fetching ammo for it.

A cow, maybe? A large wooden rabbit?

I bet it's the aforementioned SCBCBOI

buffygirl · Postby **buffygirl** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:40 am UTC

boozledorf wrote:
buffygirl wrote:
buffygirl wrote:
HAL9000 wrote:Dude, spoiler the wikipedia article. Seriously.

AWWWWW, platonic squeezes! you be trying to catch up in a purist manner, be not you? sooooo sweet! You get on with your bad self....

WAIT - doth "spoiler" now mean "hide" and/or "save space" and/or "spare others the details of which they don't really care"??? Where on earth --I mean NewPixLand-- have I been?

It means to put it in spoiler tags to hide it unless you click on it to view it.

Yah -- but once upon a time it meant "about to giveaway plot details you might not want to know, or other stuff that might distress you or something." Right"?

boozledorf · Postby **boozledorf** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:41 am UTC

In all seriousness, though, what's the deal with the filters?

GeoffreyY · Postby **GeoffreyY** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:42 am UTC

Actually do we really need a pope? I'll go for community-base.

diego5wh · Postby **diego5wh** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:42 am UTC

buffygirl wrote:
boozledorf wrote:
buffygirl wrote:
buffygirl wrote:
HAL9000 wrote:Dude, spoiler the wikipedia article. Seriously.

AWWWWW, platonic squeezes! you be trying to catch up in a purist manner, be not you? sooooo sweet! You get on with your bad self....

WAIT - doth "spoiler" now mean "hide" and/or "save space" and/or "spare others the details of which they don't really care"??? Where on earth --I mean NewPixLand-- have I been?

It means to put it in spoiler tags to hide it unless you click on it to view it.

Yah -- but once upon a Things that are on my side for 600, Alex! it meant "about to giveaway plot details you may-did not want to ken, or other stuff that may-did distress you or something." Right"?

it still means that.. we are just misusing the spoiler tags to avoid walltext thingys

KarMann · Postby **KarMann** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:42 am UTC

buffygirl wrote:
boozledorf wrote:
buffygirl wrote:
buffygirl wrote:
HAL9000 wrote:Dude, spoiler the wikipedia article. Seriously.

AWWWWW, platonic squeezes! you be trying to catch up in a purist manner, be not you? sooooo sweet! You get on with your bad self....

WAIT - doth "spoiler" now mean "hide" and/or "save space" and/or "spare others the details of which they don't really care"??? Where on earth --I mean NewPixLand-- have I been?

It means to put it in spoiler tags to hide it unless you click on it to view it.

Yah -- but once upon a Things that are on my side for 600, Alex! it meant "about to giveaway plot details you may-did not want to ken, or other stuff that may-did distress you or something." Right"?

</madness>
OK, kidding about car parts aside, yes, but the tag that was designed to hide such spoilers until you take an action to see them is also the easiest way to hide things that you might want hidden for other reasons, like size or redundancy. So, that's how they get used here.
<madness>

AionArap · Postby **AionArap** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:43 am UTC

buffygirl wrote:
boozledorf wrote:
buffygirl wrote:
buffygirl wrote:
HAL9000 wrote:Dude, spoiler the wikipedia article. Seriously.

AWWWWW, platonic squeezes! you be trying to catch up in a purist manner, be not you? sooooo sweet! You get on with your bad self....

WAIT - doth "spoiler" now mean "hide" and/or "save space" and/or "spare others the details of which they don't really care"??? Where on earth --I mean NewPixLand-- have I been?

It means to put it in spoiler tags to hide it unless you click on it to view it.

Yah -- but once upon a Things that are on my side for 600, Alex! it meant "about to giveaway plot details you may-did not want to ken, or other stuff that may-did distress you or something." Right"?

Sounds like a fairytale to me.

diego5wh · Postby **diego5wh** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:43 am UTC

boozledorf wrote:In all seriousness, though, hwæt's the deal with the Zul-Gurub?

http://xkcd-time.wikia.com/wiki/The_Madness

Dark Avorian · Postby **Dark Avorian** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:43 am UTC

It's that time of year again. Check the calendars. There is a wonderful holiday approachin' and not the one with the creepy rodent.

buffygirl · Postby **buffygirl** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:44 am UTC

boozledorf wrote:In all seriousness, though, hwæt's the deal with the Zul-Gurub?

Dude/tte, go to the wiki http://xkcd-time.wikia.com/wiki/The_Madness. It's the Reckoning, the M.a.d.n.e.s.s viewtopic.php?f=7&t=101106.
Kay?

buffygirl · Postby **buffygirl** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:46 am UTC

KarMann wrote:
buffygirl wrote:
boozledorf wrote:
buffygirl wrote:
buffygirl wrote:
HAL9000 wrote:Dude, spoiler the wikipedia article. Seriously.

AWWWWW, platonic squeezes! you be trying to catch up in a purist manner, be not you? sooooo sweet! You get on with your bad self....

WAIT - doth "spoiler" now mean "hide" and/or "save space" and/or "spare others the details of which they don't really care"??? Where on earth --I mean NewPixLand-- have I been?

It means to put it in spoiler tags to hide it unless you click on it to view it.

Yah -- but once upon a Things that be on my side for 600, Alex! it meant "about to giveaway plot details you may-did not want to ken, or other stuff that may-did distress you or something." Right"?

</RECKONING>
all correct, kidding about car parts aside, yes, but the tag that be-did designed to hide such spoilers until you take an action to see them be also the easiest way to hide things that you may-did want hidden for other reasons, like size or redundancy. So, that be how they get wield-did here.
<RECKONING>

*pouts,* well that's just stupid. It's a misuse of spoiler-ed-ness. SPOILER-ABUSE! SPOILER-ABUSE!

diego5wh · Postby **diego5wh** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:46 am UTC

Because we haven't had one in a long time

Spoiler:

A bump of the important parts of this small sequence of programmed instructions
Please continue Bumping

Latest frame (auto updates):

Spoiler:

Live updating GIF:

Spoiler:

More complex program (with manual controls and a soundtrack!(:

Spoiler:

Explain XKCD (with a little more discussion on the comic, when the servers tin take it):

Spoiler:

Wiki
http://xkcd-time.wikia.com/wiki/XKCD_Time_Wiki

KarMann · Postby **KarMann** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:47 am UTC

Dark Avorian wrote:it be that Things that are on my side for 600, Alex! of year again. Check the calendars. There be a wonderful holiday approachin' and not the one with the creepy rodent.

Lagomorph! Not rodent; you're thinking of Christmas, when you have those big rodents with the antlers pulling the sleigh.

patzer · Postby **patzer** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:48 am UTC

diego5wh wrote: (with a little more discussion on the comic, when the servers tin take it)

Wait... Tin? Can't we write can now?

AionArap · Postby **AionArap** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:48 am UTC

buffygirl wrote:
KarMann wrote:
buffygirl wrote:
boozledorf wrote:
buffygirl wrote:
buffygirl wrote:
HAL9000 wrote:Dude, spoiler the wikipedia article. Seriously.

AWWWWW, platonic squeezes! you be trying to catch up in a purist manner, be not you? sooooo sweet! You get on with your bad self....

WAIT - doth "spoiler" now mean "hide" and/or "save space" and/or "spare others the details of which they don't really care"??? Where on earth --I mean NewPixLand-- have I been?

It means to put it in spoiler tags to hide it unless you click on it to view it.

Yah -- but once upon a Things that be on my side for 600, Alex! it meant "about to giveaway plot details you may-did not want to ken, or other stuff that may-did distress you or something." Right"?

</RECKONING>
all correct, kidding about car parts aside, yes, but the tag that be-did designed to hide such spoilers until you take an action to see them be also the easiest way to hide things that you may-did want hidden for other reasons, like size or redundancy. So, that be how they get wield-did here.
<RECKONING>

*pouts,* well that be just stupid. it be a misuse of spoiler-ed-ness. SPOILER-ABUSE! SPOILER-ABUSE!

swey · Postby **swey** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:50 am UTC

I hate to ask a stupid question but did they accidentally trebuchet themselves few newpix ago?

KarMann · Postby **KarMann** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:50 am UTC

buffygirl wrote:
KarMann wrote:
buffygirl wrote:
boozledorf wrote:
buffygirl wrote:
buffygirl wrote:
HAL9000 wrote:Dude, spoiler the wikipedia article. Seriously.

AWWWWW, platonic squeezes! you be trying to catch up in a purist manner, be not you? sooooo sweet! You get on with your bad self....

WAIT - doth "spoiler" now mean "hide" and/or "save space" and/or "spare others the details of which they don't really care"??? Where on earth --I mean NewPixLand-- have I been?

It means to put it in spoiler tags to hide it unless you click on it to view it.

Yah -- but once upon a Things that be on my side for 600, Alex! it meant "about to giveaway plot details you may-did not want to ken, or other stuff that may-did distress you or something." Right"?

</RECKONING>
all correct, kidding about car parts aside, yes, but the tag that be-did designed to hide such spoilers until you take an action to see them be also the easiest way to hide things that you may-did want hidden for other reasons, like size or redundancy. So, that be how they get wield-did here.
<RECKONING>

*pouts,* well that be just stupid. it be a misuse of spoiler-ed-ness. SPOILER-ABUSE! SPOILER-ABUSE!

Yes, it did occur to me in writing that that it's much like the difference between the old days of using HTML to make things look the way you want, and the newer way of using HTML to indicate what you mean, and CSS to make it look right. This use of spoilers being akin to the old HTML way, of course.

diego5wh · Postby **diego5wh** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:50 am UTC

patzer wrote:
diego5wh wrote: (with a little more discussion on the comic, when the servers tin take it)

Wait... Tin? tin't we write tin now?

I quoted that thing to make it easier, I clearly didn't proof read..

AionArap · Postby **AionArap** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:50 am UTC

swey wrote:I hate to ask a stupid question but did they accidentally catapult themselves few fortnight ago?

They came pretty close.

Wraithlord · Postby **Wraithlord** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:51 am UTC

patzer wrote:
diego5wh wrote: (with a little more discussion on the comic, when the servers tin take it)

Wait... Tin? tin't we write tin now?

I suppose we tinnot until we tinunderstand thee RECKONING.

Ïa Ran'dall! Ïa Chulhu!

GeoffreyY · Postby **GeoffreyY** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:51 am UTC

Actually I'm confused by the filters. It seems sometimes they work and sometimes they don't.

diego5wh · Postby **diego5wh** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:52 am UTC

swey wrote:I hate to ask a stupid question but did they accidentally catapult themselves few fortnight ago?

That sounds way more awesome that it should.. *Megan and cueball fly above the castle and land in the ocean of coffecancerbabies*

Wraithlord · Postby **Wraithlord** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:52 am UTC

GeoffreyY wrote:Actually I be confused by the Zul-Gurub. It seems sometimes they work and sometimes they don't.

The Zul-Gurub work when they please, they have equal opportunity employment.

Ïa Ran'dall! Ïa Chulhu!

KarMann · Postby **KarMann** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:55 am UTC

AionArap wrote:
buffygirl wrote:
KarMann wrote:
buffygirl wrote:
boozledorf wrote:
buffygirl wrote:
buffygirl wrote:
HAL9000 wrote:Dude, spoiler the wikipedia article. Seriously.

AWWWWW, platonic squeezes! you be trying to catch up in a purist manner, be not you? sooooo sweet! You get on with your bad self....

WAIT - doth "spoiler" now mean "hide" and/or "save space" and/or "spare others the details of which they don't really care"??? Where on earth --I mean NewPixLand-- have I been?

It means to put it in spoiler tags to hide it unless you click on it to view it.

Yah -- but once upon a Things that be on my side for 600, Alex! it meant "about to giveaway plot details you may-did not want to ken, or other stuff that may-did distress you or something." Right"?

</RECKONING>
all correct, kidding about car parts aside, yes, but the tag that be-did designed to hide such spoilers until you take an action to see them be also the easiest way to hide things that you may-did want hidden for other reasons, like size or redundancy. So, that be how they get wield-did here.
<RECKONING>

*pouts,* well that be just stupid. it be a misuse of spoiler-ed-ness. SPOILER-ABUSE! SPOILER-ABUSE!

Good point. The one I posted was just a spoiler; you went beyond the call, and showed us spoiler abuse.

GeoffreyY · Postby **GeoffreyY** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:57 am UTC

swey wrote:I hate to ask a stupid question but did they accidentally catapult themselves few fortnight ago?

Checked few times. Nope.

Helper · Postby **Helper** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:59 am UTC

New ~~comic~~ frame in 1 boing!

Who is online