1190: "Time"

This forum is for the individual discussion thread that goes with each new comic.

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

User avatar
buffygirl
Cardinal
Posts: 736
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:09 pm UTC
Location: BuffyDashery closed.

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby buffygirl » Sat Apr 06, 2013 7:44 pm UTC

Can someone help with the buffygirl wiki page?

Oooh! This was my 200th post!

User avatar
LoneMarauder
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 3:35 am UTC
Location: Birmingham, AL US

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby LoneMarauder » Sat Apr 06, 2013 7:48 pm UTC

They're building scaffolding so they can go higher.

User avatar
Smithers
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 2:51 am UTC
Location: Cambridge, England
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby Smithers » Sat Apr 06, 2013 7:50 pm UTC

KarMann wrote:You're also all* assuming that this is two-dimensional, so there can be no foreshortening. Which is funny, because I'm the one who suggested that Occam's razor suggested no need for a third spatial dimension. (It doesn't really.)

* or "y'all are also"

Occam's razor works fine for deciding between one theory that assumes X and another that assumes X and Y; one should choose the former. It fails, however, when neither theory assumes a subset of the assumptions of the other. To choose between a theory that assumes A and B and a theory that assumes C and D it is no help at all. Depending on preference, I could claim A and B were seperate assumptions ot that (A and B) is a single assumption. By doing the same for C and D I could claim that Occam's razor demands whichever of the theories I choose, as one assumption is preferable to two.
To return to the matter at hand, we are choosing between "there are more than 2 spatial dimensions" and "physical objects can pass through one another". Occam's razor does not help us to select between the two. We can, in fact, observe the truth of each of these assumptions in the outside; the former is known to be true and the latter false. It then becomes a question of whether we should assume the One True Comic is more or less like the outside in these regards, a matter that I must defer to the Congrigation pro Doctrina Temporis.
Lord Randall, Creator of the One True Comic wrote:Wait for it.

Helper wrote:The great thing about this needle-pulled thing be that it tin turn ænig everyday situation into an hilarious nightmare:
Helper goeth to Starbux:
"ic'd like an coffee, please. Hold the baby!"
"hwæt? eow be, like, weird."
"Y-Y-You too.FULL STOPFULL STOP"

User avatar
udscbt
Cardinal
Posts: 193
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:21 pm UTC
Location: Italy

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby udscbt » Sat Apr 06, 2013 7:54 pm UTC

Smithers wrote:
KarMann wrote:You're also all* assuming that this is two-dimensional, so there can be no foreshortening. Which is funny, because I'm the one who suggested that Occam's razor suggested no need for a third spatial dimension. (It doesn't really.)

* or "y'all are also"

Occam's razor works fine for deciding between one theory that assumes X and another that assumes X and Y; one should choose the former. It fails, however, when neither theory assumes a subset of the assumptions of the other. To choose between a theory that assumes A and B and a theory that assumes C and D it is no help at all. Depending on preference, I could claim A and B were seperate assumptions ot that (A and B) is a single assumption. By doing the same for C and D I could claim that Occam's razor demands whichever of the theories I choose, as one assumption is preferable to two.
To return to the matter at hand, we are choosing between "there are more than 2 spatial dimensions" and "physical objects can pass through one another". Occam's razor does not help us to select between the two. We can, in fact, observe the truth of each of these assumptions in the outside; the former is known to be true and the latter false. It then becomes a question of whether we should assume the One True Comic is more or less like the outside in these regards, a matter that I must defer to the Congrigation pro Doctrina Temporis.

The workload is increasing. I delegate the Secretary.
udscbt (a.k.a アダスチボト), Cardinal of the Timewaiters, Prefect of the Congregatio pro Doctrina Temporis, peanut butter and jelly sandwich. Burn y'all heretics!
buffygirl wrote:I, Timewaiter Buffygirl, Cardinal of The One True Comic, do hereby nominate you, udscbt, for the position of Cardinal. -poof!- You're a peanut butter and jelly sandwich! Wait, that's not right - - -

bigcrag92 wrote:I Bigcrag92 being of soundish mind yada yada yada do ratify the cardinalship of udscbt nominated by buffygirl. may I and buffygirl be stuck down if we have erred in this decision.

bigcrag92 (continued...) wrote:by the power vested in me I now name you Cardinal peanut butter and jelly sandwich udscbt. arise my brethren

User avatar
kryton
Posts: 218
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:34 am UTC

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby kryton » Sat Apr 06, 2013 7:55 pm UTC

Not to be a complainer but all 3 are behind on updates
Explain
Wiki
Aubronwood
I wanted to review newpix reveals from during my coma and failed.
1298 and counting

User avatar
Smithers
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 2:51 am UTC
Location: Cambridge, England
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby Smithers » Sat Apr 06, 2013 7:57 pm UTC

kryton wrote:Not to be a complainer but all 3 are behind on updates
Explain
Wiki
Aubronwood
I wanted to review newpix reveals from during my coma and failed.

Then review the thread. Someone (almost) always posts every new frame as it is revealed.
Lord Randall, Creator of the One True Comic wrote:Wait for it.

Helper wrote:The great thing about this needle-pulled thing be that it tin turn ænig everyday situation into an hilarious nightmare:
Helper goeth to Starbux:
"ic'd like an coffee, please. Hold the baby!"
"hwæt? eow be, like, weird."
"Y-Y-You too.FULL STOPFULL STOP"

User avatar
udscbt
Cardinal
Posts: 193
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:21 pm UTC
Location: Italy

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby udscbt » Sat Apr 06, 2013 7:58 pm UTC

kryton wrote:Not to be a complainer but all 3 are behind on updates
Explain
Wiki
Aubronwood
I wanted to review newpix reveals from during my coma and failed.

I haven't checked the others, but http://xkcd.aubronwood.com/ seems up to date.
udscbt (a.k.a アダスチボト), Cardinal of the Timewaiters, Prefect of the Congregatio pro Doctrina Temporis, peanut butter and jelly sandwich. Burn y'all heretics!
buffygirl wrote:I, Timewaiter Buffygirl, Cardinal of The One True Comic, do hereby nominate you, udscbt, for the position of Cardinal. -poof!- You're a peanut butter and jelly sandwich! Wait, that's not right - - -

bigcrag92 wrote:I Bigcrag92 being of soundish mind yada yada yada do ratify the cardinalship of udscbt nominated by buffygirl. may I and buffygirl be stuck down if we have erred in this decision.

bigcrag92 (continued...) wrote:by the power vested in me I now name you Cardinal peanut butter and jelly sandwich udscbt. arise my brethren

User avatar
SBN
Saved
Posts: 2106
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 7:15 pm UTC
Location: No longer in the home of the raptorcats, now in the home of the raptorcats.

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby SBN » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:00 pm UTC

kryton wrote:Not to be a complainer but all 3 are behind on updates
Explain
Wiki
Aubronwood
I wanted to review newpix reveals from during my coma and failed.


The Book of Aubron is up to date, so you can at least see the Newpix. Current max Newpix is 424.
astrotter wrote:It is not particularly clear to me at this time that we are not overanalyzing this...

Randalspeed thunk, iskinner, and other blitzers! Notes from the before-was improve the after-when.
Some Ways to Time
NetWeasel wrote:I want to put that in my sig... BUT I CAN'T!!!!

User avatar
KarMann
As far as the hats go, I think it's safe to say that I'm pretty well set. Unless my hat, pre-dating Time itself, needs a hat of its own??
Posts: 916
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:38 am UTC
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA, far from river and sea
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby KarMann » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:00 pm UTC

Image
Another one??
P.S. I am Randall, but not that Randall.
We can rebuild it. We have the technology. We can make it better than it was. Better … stronger … well, maybe not faster.
Well, BlitzGirl is experiencing a bit of a title wave.
Magdiragdag wrote:I wait for it, therefore I am.
Illud expecto, ergo sum.

User avatar
udscbt
Cardinal
Posts: 193
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:21 pm UTC
Location: Italy

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby udscbt » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:00 pm UTC

I'm sorry I have to double-post, but I don't want to edit the last post for the Frame [EDIT: ninja'd]
Image
Everything goes as expected.
Last edited by udscbt on Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:04 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.
udscbt (a.k.a アダスチボト), Cardinal of the Timewaiters, Prefect of the Congregatio pro Doctrina Temporis, peanut butter and jelly sandwich. Burn y'all heretics!
buffygirl wrote:I, Timewaiter Buffygirl, Cardinal of The One True Comic, do hereby nominate you, udscbt, for the position of Cardinal. -poof!- You're a peanut butter and jelly sandwich! Wait, that's not right - - -

bigcrag92 wrote:I Bigcrag92 being of soundish mind yada yada yada do ratify the cardinalship of udscbt nominated by buffygirl. may I and buffygirl be stuck down if we have erred in this decision.

bigcrag92 (continued...) wrote:by the power vested in me I now name you Cardinal peanut butter and jelly sandwich udscbt. arise my brethren

User avatar
Smithers
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 2:51 am UTC
Location: Cambridge, England
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby Smithers » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:04 pm UTC

davidy22 wrote:
Smithers wrote:
davidy22 wrote:
SBN wrote:
davidy22 wrote:So, the auto-updating GIF seems to be unavailable for me. Anyone got an up-to-date GIF of the thing?


The Book of Aubron: http://xkcd.aubronwood.com/


I have really specific needs. I actually need a single file, not a bunch of images chained together with javascript magic. Unfortunate that Primis seems to be down.

http://xkcd-time.wikia.com/wiki/File:Time_1-418.gif


It's beautiful and I love it. It's now on the explainxkcd wiki.

I'm glad you like it. I guess I assumed that by
davidy22 wrote:I'm looking for a single file that cycles through all the past frames. An animated GIF of all the images so far. I'm doing this for the wiki, so checking the wiki doesn't really help me much.

you meant the xkcd Time Wiki. Does this mean that explainxkcd has become our The Other Wiki?
Lord Randall, Creator of the One True Comic wrote:Wait for it.

Helper wrote:The great thing about this needle-pulled thing be that it tin turn ænig everyday situation into an hilarious nightmare:
Helper goeth to Starbux:
"ic'd like an coffee, please. Hold the baby!"
"hwæt? eow be, like, weird."
"Y-Y-You too.FULL STOPFULL STOP"

User avatar
mybrainhurts
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 7:09 am UTC
Location: Baltic Sea, Germany

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby mybrainhurts » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:05 pm UTC

Hmmm... Or maybe a scaffold?

EDIT: Ooops, hadn't seen i't's been mentioned already 17 minutes earlier. :oops:
Last edited by mybrainhurts on Sun Apr 07, 2013 7:27 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
KarMann
As far as the hats go, I think it's safe to say that I'm pretty well set. Unless my hat, pre-dating Time itself, needs a hat of its own??
Posts: 916
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:38 am UTC
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA, far from river and sea
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby KarMann » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:06 pm UTC

buffygirl wrote:Image
Firefox has encountered an error and is about to go up in flames.
P.S. I am Randall, but not that Randall.
We can rebuild it. We have the technology. We can make it better than it was. Better … stronger … well, maybe not faster.
Well, BlitzGirl is experiencing a bit of a title wave.
Magdiragdag wrote:I wait for it, therefore I am.
Illud expecto, ergo sum.

User avatar
tman2nd
Posts: 419
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:56 pm UTC
Location: Somewhere south of the North Poll

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby tman2nd » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:08 pm UTC

Here's my take on the whole comma debate.
Oxford commas are a matter of preference, so writer can choose whether to include it or not. However, the comma in "Lurked, waited, posted, and it's interminable" is not an Oxford comma. Combined with the "and" it's actually joining two independent clauses. I guess if it were to be completely correct it would have to be "I lurked, posted(,) and waited, and it's indeterminable.", but that wouldn't fit the acronym. "Lurked, waited, posted; and it's interminable" doesn't work because you can't start a sentence with "and".
Sir Tristram, Guardian of the Time Cats, Defender of the One True Comic, Landsknecht von der Zeit.

Wspi kfp gd...
Wait for it...

User avatar
SBN
Saved
Posts: 2106
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 7:15 pm UTC
Location: No longer in the home of the raptorcats, now in the home of the raptorcats.

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby SBN » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:10 pm UTC

tman2nd wrote:Here's my take on the whole comma debate.
Oxford commas are a matter of preference, so writer can choose whether to include it or not. However, the comma in "Lurked, waited, posted, and it's interminable" is not an Oxford comma. Combined with the "and" it's actually joining two independent clauses. I guess if it were to be completely correct it would have to be "I lurked, posted(,) and waited, and it's indeterminable.", but that wouldn't fit the acronym. "Lurked, waited, posted; and it's interminable" doesn't work because you can't start a sentence with "and".


And why not?
astrotter wrote:It is not particularly clear to me at this time that we are not overanalyzing this...

Randalspeed thunk, iskinner, and other blitzers! Notes from the before-was improve the after-when.
Some Ways to Time
NetWeasel wrote:I want to put that in my sig... BUT I CAN'T!!!!

rmsgrey
Posts: 2915
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 6:35 pm UTC

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby rmsgrey » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:11 pm UTC

Must dash:

Lurked, waited, posted - and it's interminable.

User avatar
tman2nd
Posts: 419
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:56 pm UTC
Location: Somewhere south of the North Poll

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby tman2nd » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:11 pm UTC

Smithers wrote:
KarMann wrote:You're also all* assuming that this is two-dimensional, so there can be no foreshortening. Which is funny, because I'm the one who suggested that Occam's razor suggested no need for a third spatial dimension. (It doesn't really.)

* or "y'all are also"

Occam's razor works fine for deciding between one theory that assumes X and another that assumes X and Y; one should choose the former. It fails, however, when neither theory assumes a subset of the assumptions of the other. To choose between a theory that assumes A and B and a theory that assumes C and D it is no help at all. Depending on preference, I could claim A and B were seperate assumptions ot that (A and B) is a single assumption. By doing the same for C and D I could claim that Occam's razor demands whichever of the theories I choose, as one assumption is preferable to two.
To return to the matter at hand, we are choosing between "there are more than 2 spatial dimensions" and "physical objects can pass through one another". Occam's razor does not help us to select between the two. We can, in fact, observe the truth of each of these assumptions in the outside; the former is known to be true and the latter false. It then becomes a question of whether we should assume the One True Comic is more or less like the outside in these regards, a matter that I must defer to the Congrigation pro Doctrina Temporis.

We know there are three dimensions because they go behind (or in front of) the sand castles.
Sir Tristram, Guardian of the Time Cats, Defender of the One True Comic, Landsknecht von der Zeit.

Wspi kfp gd...
Wait for it...

User avatar
KarMann
As far as the hats go, I think it's safe to say that I'm pretty well set. Unless my hat, pre-dating Time itself, needs a hat of its own??
Posts: 916
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:38 am UTC
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA, far from river and sea
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby KarMann » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:14 pm UTC

SBN wrote:
tman2nd wrote:Here's my take on the whole comma debate.
Oxford commas are a matter of preference, so writer can choose whether to include it or not. However, the comma in "Lurked, waited, posted, and it's interminable" is not an Oxford comma. Combined with the "and" it's actually joining two independent clauses. I guess if it were to be completely correct it would have to be "I lurked, posted(,) and waited, and it's indeterminable.", but that wouldn't fit the acronym. "Lurked, waited, posted; and it's interminable" doesn't work because you can't start a sentence with "and".

And why not?

I think you're actually kind of making tman2nd's point for him*. What actual purpose does your "and" serve other than as a counterexample? How is your question improved by its presence in a way that a simple "why not?" wouldn't, aside from counterexample?

Added:
* or her, but I'm taking a guess based on the "man" part of the nick
Last edited by KarMann on Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:16 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.
P.S. I am Randall, but not that Randall.
We can rebuild it. We have the technology. We can make it better than it was. Better … stronger … well, maybe not faster.
Well, BlitzGirl is experiencing a bit of a title wave.
Magdiragdag wrote:I wait for it, therefore I am.
Illud expecto, ergo sum.

User avatar
KarMann
As far as the hats go, I think it's safe to say that I'm pretty well set. Unless my hat, pre-dating Time itself, needs a hat of its own??
Posts: 916
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:38 am UTC
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA, far from river and sea
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby KarMann » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:15 pm UTC

tman2nd wrote:
Smithers wrote:
KarMann wrote:You're also all* assuming that this is two-dimensional, so there can be no foreshortening. Which is funny, because I'm the one who suggested that Occam's razor suggested no need for a third spatial dimension. (It doesn't really.)

* or "y'all are also"

Occam's razor works fine for deciding between one theory that assumes X and another that assumes X and Y; one should choose the former. It fails, however, when neither theory assumes a subset of the assumptions of the other. To choose between a theory that assumes A and B and a theory that assumes C and D it is no help at all. Depending on preference, I could claim A and B were seperate assumptions ot that (A and B) is a single assumption. By doing the same for C and D I could claim that Occam's razor demands whichever of the theories I choose, as one assumption is preferable to two.
To return to the matter at hand, we are choosing between "there are more than 2 spatial dimensions" and "physical objects can pass through one another". Occam's razor does not help us to select between the two. We can, in fact, observe the truth of each of these assumptions in the outside; the former is known to be true and the latter false. It then becomes a question of whether we should assume the One True Comic is more or less like the outside in these regards, a matter that I must defer to the Congrigation pro Doctrina Temporis.

We know there are three dimensions because they go behind (or in front of) the sand castles.

Or through; that was pretty well pointed out there.
P.S. I am Randall, but not that Randall.
We can rebuild it. We have the technology. We can make it better than it was. Better … stronger … well, maybe not faster.
Well, BlitzGirl is experiencing a bit of a title wave.
Magdiragdag wrote:I wait for it, therefore I am.
Illud expecto, ergo sum.

boozledorf
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 6:54 am UTC

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby boozledorf » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:18 pm UTC

Look, which people are impressively insane? (Hint: it's you guys)

User avatar
Roia
Posts: 60
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 4:50 pm UTC
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby Roia » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:19 pm UTC

Does this count as a new period? The pole period?
The World is Waiting, Anticipating...

lazy-bunny.com - Blog.

User avatar
mybrainhurts
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 7:09 am UTC
Location: Baltic Sea, Germany

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby mybrainhurts » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:19 pm UTC

Could the comma guys please go coma?

User avatar
KarMann
As far as the hats go, I think it's safe to say that I'm pretty well set. Unless my hat, pre-dating Time itself, needs a hat of its own??
Posts: 916
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:38 am UTC
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA, far from river and sea
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby KarMann » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:19 pm UTC

boozledorf wrote:Look, which people are impressively insane? (Hint: it's you guys)

I like it. Gets my vote. With or without that possibly superfluous (but meaning-changing) comma.
P.S. I am Randall, but not that Randall.
We can rebuild it. We have the technology. We can make it better than it was. Better … stronger … well, maybe not faster.
Well, BlitzGirl is experiencing a bit of a title wave.
Magdiragdag wrote:I wait for it, therefore I am.
Illud expecto, ergo sum.

User avatar
flicky1991
Like in Cinderella?
Posts: 520
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 3:36 pm UTC
Location: London

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby flicky1991 » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:21 pm UTC

Roia wrote:Does this count as a new period? The pole period?

It seems like it should.
Discord for Forum Games posters
---
adopted by emlightened

Elmach
Posts: 155
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 7:47 am UTC

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby Elmach » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:23 pm UTC

KarMann wrote:
SBN wrote:
tman2nd wrote:Here's my take on the whole comma debate.
Oxford commas are a matter of preference, so writer can choose whether to include it or not. However, the comma in "Lurked, waited, posted, and it's interminable" is not an Oxford comma. Combined with the "and" it's actually joining two independent clauses. I guess if it were to be completely correct it would have to be "I lurked, posted(,) and waited, and it's indeterminable.", but that wouldn't fit the acronym. "Lurked, waited, posted; and it's interminable" doesn't work because you can't start a sentence with "and".

And why not?

I think you're actually kind of making tman2nd's point for him*. What actual purpose does your "and" serve other than as a counterexample? How is your question improved by its presence in a way that a simple "why not?" wouldn't, aside from counterexample?

Added:
* or her, but I'm taking a guess based on the "man" part of the nick

What actual purpose does this post serve other than a refutation? How is this post improved by its presence in a way that its absence would not, except for a refutation of his point? And in a similar vein, what purpose does this post have, other than a refutation of yours? And how can anyone read this post*, given how it is full of troll logic***?

* Mine, not KarMann's.
** Obligatory TVTropes** link.****
*** Obligatory TVTropes** link.
**** Yes, I recursed my foot-notes. So what?

User avatar
tman2nd
Posts: 419
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:56 pm UTC
Location: Somewhere south of the North Poll

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby tman2nd » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:25 pm UTC

KarMann wrote:
boozledorf wrote:Look, which people are impressively insane? (Hint: it's you guys)

I like it. Gets my vote. With or without that possibly superfluous (but meaning-changing) comma.

Oh, at first I didn't realize that he was proposing an option for the acronym.
Without the comma, it isn't a question, so it belongs there.
Sir Tristram, Guardian of the Time Cats, Defender of the One True Comic, Landsknecht von der Zeit.

Wspi kfp gd...
Wait for it...

User avatar
Davidy
Posts: 221
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 1:18 am UTC

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby Davidy » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:28 pm UTC

macraw83 wrote:
orthogon wrote:
boozledorf wrote:
descor wrote:
RobIrr wrote:
orthogon wrote:
Angelastic wrote:
orthogon wrote:
boozledorf wrote:
Montov wrote:Let's speculate how this is a sign of the relationship of Randall, his career, coffee and/or the purpose of life. And how the first letters of all the frames with dialogues in them spell a very disturbing word.

Lpaii. Such a disturbing word.

Skim-reading that post, I totally assumed "Lpaii" was one of those Internet abbreviations, like LMAO, FTFY, inb4 etc. I think we should retrofit a meaning to it. But first we need to agree whether it's Lpaii or Lwpaii is correct.

[Edit]A superfluous one of those dratted it'ses crept in there. Either that or there's a that's missing.

Laughing With Perspicacity About Its/It's?

Nice, and has some relevance to the One True Thread. My suggestion is lwpaii = "laughing, weeing, pooing and injecting insulin". Descriptive of a state of uncontrolled hilarity induced at an inconvenient time in a sufferer of diabetes.


Looked, waited, posted, and it's interminable.


I like this one - except for the Oxford comma.
There exist people who disapprove of the Oxford Comma????????¿?¿?¿?

There do, and they're wrong :mrgreen:
I don't even know whether that is one or not. Then again I'm not convinced that RobIrr's was one either. Doesn't seem like "it's interminable" is part of the same list as "looked, waited, posted". To omit the comma would be to court the danger of syllepsis.


I think technically it should be "Looked, waited, and posted, and it's interminable." Except for "Looked, waited, and posted" has no subject, so...

EDIT: I find it amusing that this most recent off-topic discussion has revolved around picking apart the grammar of forum posts. And suddenly I am ashamed of having participated... :oops:

Actually, it should be, "Looked, waited and posted; and it's interminable."
"It's only funny until someone loses an eye, then it's still funny but they can only see it in 2-D."

User avatar
Smithers
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 2:51 am UTC
Location: Cambridge, England
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby Smithers » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:29 pm UTC

tman2nd wrote:
KarMann wrote:
boozledorf wrote:Look, which people are impressively insane? (Hint: it's you guys)

I like it. Gets my vote. With or without that possibly superfluous (but meaning-changing) comma.

Oh, at first I didn't realize that he was proposing an option for the acronym.
Without the comma, it isn't a question, so it belongs there.

Then one can still remove the comma, as long as one also replaces the question mark with a full stop and removes the parenthetical.
Lord Randall, Creator of the One True Comic wrote:Wait for it.

Helper wrote:The great thing about this needle-pulled thing be that it tin turn ænig everyday situation into an hilarious nightmare:
Helper goeth to Starbux:
"ic'd like an coffee, please. Hold the baby!"
"hwæt? eow be, like, weird."
"Y-Y-You too.FULL STOPFULL STOP"

User avatar
Eliram
Posts: 157
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 12:58 pm UTC

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby Eliram » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:31 pm UTC

udscbt wrote:
Montov wrote:
udscbt wrote:Image
Interesting


Megan is gone, so I think this is the end. Bringing in the pole was the punchline. Only an Outsider would not get that hilarious and beautiful ending.

It can't end until we reach 500 Frames. How could we be connoisseurs otherwise?
She (or Cueball) will return with something else. And they will build a robotic raptor.

You mean 512 frames. Right?
It's about time.

User avatar
KarMann
As far as the hats go, I think it's safe to say that I'm pretty well set. Unless my hat, pre-dating Time itself, needs a hat of its own??
Posts: 916
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:38 am UTC
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA, far from river and sea
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby KarMann » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:32 pm UTC

Smithers wrote:
tman2nd wrote:
KarMann wrote:
boozledorf wrote:Look, which people are impressively insane? (Hint: it's you guys)

I like it. Gets my vote. With or without that possibly superfluous (but meaning-changing) comma.

Oh, at first I didn't realize that he was proposing an option for the acronym.
Without the comma, it isn't a question, so it belongs there.

Then one can still remove the comma, as long as one also replaces the question mark with a full stop and removes the parenthetical.

Right, I did kind of omit the change of terminal punctuation, but I was thinking it. Thanks for pointing (& figuring) that out.
I do feel that the parenthetical could remain either way, though, but clearly not part of the acronym, unless we get really lucky with the next few appearances of dialogue.
P.S. I am Randall, but not that Randall.
We can rebuild it. We have the technology. We can make it better than it was. Better … stronger … well, maybe not faster.
Well, BlitzGirl is experiencing a bit of a title wave.
Magdiragdag wrote:I wait for it, therefore I am.
Illud expecto, ergo sum.

User avatar
KarMann
As far as the hats go, I think it's safe to say that I'm pretty well set. Unless my hat, pre-dating Time itself, needs a hat of its own??
Posts: 916
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:38 am UTC
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA, far from river and sea
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby KarMann » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:33 pm UTC

Eliram wrote:
udscbt wrote:
Montov wrote:
udscbt wrote:Image
Interesting

Megan is gone, so I think this is the end. Bringing in the pole was the punchline. Only an Outsider would not get that hilarious and beautiful ending.

It can't end until we reach 500 Frames. How could we be connoisseurs otherwise?
She (or Cueball) will return with something else. And they will build a robotic raptor.

You mean 512 frames. Right?

No, they definitely mean 500.
P.S. I am Randall, but not that Randall.
We can rebuild it. We have the technology. We can make it better than it was. Better … stronger … well, maybe not faster.
Well, BlitzGirl is experiencing a bit of a title wave.
Magdiragdag wrote:I wait for it, therefore I am.
Illud expecto, ergo sum.

User avatar
tman2nd
Posts: 419
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:56 pm UTC
Location: Somewhere south of the North Poll

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby tman2nd » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:35 pm UTC

KarMann wrote:
Smithers wrote:
tman2nd wrote:
KarMann wrote:
boozledorf wrote:Look, which people are impressively insane? (Hint: it's you guys)

I like it. Gets my vote. With or without that possibly superfluous (but meaning-changing) comma.

Oh, at first I didn't realize that he was proposing an option for the acronym.
Without the comma, it isn't a question, so it belongs there.

Then one can still remove the comma, as long as one also replaces the question mark with a full stop and removes the parenthetical.

Right, I did kind of omit the change of terminal punctuation, but I was thinking it. Thanks for pointing (& figuring) that out.
I do feel that the parenthetical could remain either way, though, but clearly not part of the acronym, unless we get really lucky with the next few appearances of dialogue.

So dialogue that starts with a question mark? :P
Sir Tristram, Guardian of the Time Cats, Defender of the One True Comic, Landsknecht von der Zeit.

Wspi kfp gd...
Wait for it...

User avatar
KarMann
As far as the hats go, I think it's safe to say that I'm pretty well set. Unless my hat, pre-dating Time itself, needs a hat of its own??
Posts: 916
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:38 am UTC
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA, far from river and sea
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby KarMann » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:38 pm UTC

tman2nd wrote:
KarMann wrote:
Smithers wrote:
tman2nd wrote:
KarMann wrote:
boozledorf wrote:Look, which people are impressively insane? (Hint: it's you guys)

I like it. Gets my vote. With or without that possibly superfluous (but meaning-changing) comma.

Oh, at first I didn't realize that he was proposing an option for the acronym.
Without the comma, it isn't a question, so it belongs there.

Then one can still remove the comma, as long as one also replaces the question mark with a full stop and removes the parenthetical.

Right, I did kind of omit the change of terminal punctuation, but I was thinking it. Thanks for pointing (& figuring) that out.
I do feel that the parenthetical could remain either way, though, but clearly not part of the acronym, unless we get really lucky with the next few appearances of dialogue.

So dialogue that starts with a question mark? :P

¿Por qué?

Added:
(Butter.)
Last edited by KarMann on Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:40 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.
P.S. I am Randall, but not that Randall.
We can rebuild it. We have the technology. We can make it better than it was. Better … stronger … well, maybe not faster.
Well, BlitzGirl is experiencing a bit of a title wave.
Magdiragdag wrote:I wait for it, therefore I am.
Illud expecto, ergo sum.

User avatar
buffygirl
Cardinal
Posts: 736
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:09 pm UTC
Location: BuffyDashery closed.

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby buffygirl » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:38 pm UTC

buffygirl wrote:
PinkShinyRose wrote:
udscbt wrote:
Spoiler:
Image

Interesting


So, is she stealing the next part from the beavers in the river? Or helping Cueball hauling the loot over?

EDIT:
Montov wrote:Megan is gone, so I think this is the end. Bringing in the pole was the punchline. Only an Outsider would not get that hilarious and beautiful ending.


Well, it still says: "Wait for it."

I think the next several TimeFrames will show her going back and forth, gathering more and more poles (or planks or whatever).


KarMann wrote:Image
Another one??


I TOTALLY CALLED IT!

EDITS: spoilered the first image, changed font color.
Last edited by buffygirl on Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:43 pm UTC, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
tman2nd
Posts: 419
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:56 pm UTC
Location: Somewhere south of the North Poll

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby tman2nd » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:42 pm UTC

KarMann wrote:
tman2nd wrote:
KarMann wrote:
Smithers wrote:
tman2nd wrote:
KarMann wrote:
boozledorf wrote:Look, which people are impressively insane? (Hint: it's you guys)

I like it. Gets my vote. With or without that possibly superfluous (but meaning-changing) comma.

Oh, at first I didn't realize that he was proposing an option for the acronym.
Without the comma, it isn't a question, so it belongs there.

Then one can still remove the comma, as long as one also replaces the question mark with a full stop and removes the parenthetical.

Right, I did kind of omit the change of terminal punctuation, but I was thinking it. Thanks for pointing (& figuring) that out.
I do feel that the parenthetical could remain either way, though, but clearly not part of the acronym, unless we get really lucky with the next few appearances of dialogue.

So dialogue that starts with a question mark? :P

¿Por qué?

Added:
(Butter.)

So, It would be "Look, which people are impressively insane¿".
Sir Tristram, Guardian of the Time Cats, Defender of the One True Comic, Landsknecht von der Zeit.

Wspi kfp gd...
Wait for it...

User avatar
Mr Moriaty
Posts: 205
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 9:05 am UTC
Location: A ship in the North Sea.

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby Mr Moriaty » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:44 pm UTC

I need to Coma (not Comma) for several Timeframes.

If nothing interesting happens in the one true comic overnight I would to see the Timewaiters who are not in coma to answer the following questions so that I have something to read in the morning.
"If commas were a colour what colour would they be?"
"How to milk a Raptor and can you make cheese?"
"How many people are reading this thread naked?"

Good night dark timeframes all.
The Holy Geophysicist of the Time Waiters - Can be found eating granite with a glass of port.

User avatar
Roia
Posts: 60
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 4:50 pm UTC
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby Roia » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:47 pm UTC

Mr Moriaty wrote:"If commas were a colour what colour would they be?"


Depends on the colour of the pen you were using.

Mr Moriaty wrote:"How to milk a Raptor and can you make cheese?"


Very carefully.

Mr Moriaty wrote:"How many people are reading this thread naked?"


Thirteen.
The World is Waiting, Anticipating...

lazy-bunny.com - Blog.

User avatar
KarMann
As far as the hats go, I think it's safe to say that I'm pretty well set. Unless my hat, pre-dating Time itself, needs a hat of its own??
Posts: 916
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:38 am UTC
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA, far from river and sea
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby KarMann » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:48 pm UTC

Mr Moriaty wrote:I need to Coma (not Comma) for several Timeframes.

If nothing interesting happens in the one true comic overnight I would to see the Timewaiters who are not in coma to answer the following questions so that I have something to read in the morning.
"If commas were a colour what colour would they be?"

Black, of course.
Mr Moriaty wrote:"How to milk a Raptor and can you make cheese?"

Very carefully, and yes, though it can be rather sharp.
Mr Moriaty wrote:"How many people are reading this thread naked?"
Good night dark timeframes all.

More than you want to know.
P.S. I am Randall, but not that Randall.
We can rebuild it. We have the technology. We can make it better than it was. Better … stronger … well, maybe not faster.
Well, BlitzGirl is experiencing a bit of a title wave.
Magdiragdag wrote:I wait for it, therefore I am.
Illud expecto, ergo sum.

User avatar
kryton
Posts: 218
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:34 am UTC

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby kryton » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:49 pm UTC

KarMann wrote:
tman2nd wrote:
Smithers wrote:
KarMann wrote:You're also all* assuming that this is two-dimensional, so there can be no foreshortening. Which is funny, because I'm the one who suggested that Occam's razor suggested no need for a third spatial dimension. (It doesn't really.)

* or "y'all are also"

Occam's razor works fine for deciding between one theory that assumes X and another that assumes X and Y; one should choose the former. It fails, however, when neither theory assumes a subset of the assumptions of the other. To choose between a theory that assumes A and B and a theory that assumes C and D it is no help at all. Depending on preference, I could claim A and B were seperate assumptions ot that (A and B) is a single assumption. By doing the same for C and D I could claim that Occam's razor demands whichever of the theories I choose, as one assumption is preferable to two.
To return to the matter at hand, we are choosing between "there are more than 2 spatial dimensions" and "physical objects can pass through one another". Occam's razor does not help us to select between the two. We can, in fact, observe the truth of each of these assumptions in the outside; the former is known to be true and the latter false. It then becomes a question of whether we should assume the One True Comic is more or less like the outside in these regards, a matter that I must defer to the Congrigation pro Doctrina Temporis.

We know there are three dimensions because they go behind (or in front of) the sand castles.

Or through; that was pretty well pointed out there.


In this case, version A of the theory; they are in 2D space and objects can pass through each other; and version B; they are in 2D space and red spiders excavate perfect shaped holes in the objects so that velociraptors can push them into the holes and woodpeckers pull them out and sharks fill back in the holes thus allowing objects to pass through each other; Occam's razor says to reduce the unnecessary actors and choose version A.

But I think version B would be so neat to see in action.
1298 and counting

User avatar
kryton
Posts: 218
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:34 am UTC

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby kryton » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:53 pm UTC

If commas were a color, what color would they be?


Blue. Commas take a pause, a bit of a slow down in pace, much like people do when they feel blue...
1298 and counting


Return to “Individual XKCD Comic Threads”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], mscha and 41 guests