1190: "Time"

This forum is for the individual discussion thread that goes with each new comic.

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

User avatar
Caswallon
Posts: 229
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2013 10:04 pm UTC
Location: Seattle wa
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby Caswallon » Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:14 pm UTC

Latent22 wrote:Thanks everyone for helping with the party!
Your Welcome!

I like that other people used my "Prescient" comment about Blitzgirl showing up in the comic ;) That came together beautifully!
histrion wrote:"Gunaxf gb gur Grzcbeny Vyyhzvangv, zl jbex cebqhpgvivgl unf qrpernfrq qenzngvpnyyl! Gunaxf, Rayvtugrarq Barf!"

Precepter and historian of the Chruch of the Newpage. achoo

User avatar
lmjb1964
Posts: 2173
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 7:09 pm UTC
Location: In the Present! Need to ketchup NP 2236-2280, plus NP 2026-2058 and something like 2060-2090+?.

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby lmjb1964 » Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:19 pm UTC

mscha wrote:
lmjb1964 wrote:That is such a sad, pathetic "bye." And BlitzGirl was just saying how cheerful HER present (our past) was. Maybe we should all go live in the past.

FTFY.

lmjb1964 wrote:That watersemencancercoffeebabybaconice is rising rather quickly.

Not in the past 8 newpix it hasn't. But once Megan is off-screen, it will probably pick up again.


Hmm, I guess you're right. It was going up for a while there. I don't understand what the sea is doing.

Pfhorrest wrote:
descor wrote:Are you suggesting there is some causal link between Megan and the tide? <Fat joke goes here>

Like "Ol' Flat Top" from the classic Beatles song "Come Together", Megan is so attractive that she's hard to see.

Because any light which reaches her is unable to escape.

Because her attractiveness is gravitational.

...cuz she fat.


Oh, no you di'n't.

I keep waiting for a banner to go unfurl in the comic saying "The End." Or maybe "Fin", in honor of La Petite. The suspense is killing me!
Image

Help addams stay in her home! https://www.crowdrise.com/in-a-comically-tragic-turn-of-events-addams-didnt-die
Imagesmiley by yappo
That's a robot but it totally counts. Image

bot by balthasar_s

User avatar
dreiarmumig
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 1:33 pm UTC

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby dreiarmumig » Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:24 pm UTC

Caswallon wrote:
Latent22 wrote:Thanks everyone for helping with the party!
Your Welcome!



Sorry, couldn't resist.
Image

User avatar
mscha
Posts: 6700
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:21 pm UTC
Location: NL
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby mscha » Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:24 pm UTC

If the comic is going to end, odds are that it'll will happen at midnight EDT; or non-heretically, in 5 newpix.
If that's the case, then Randall (in His infinite wisdom) is probably just padding with things like a final "bye" from Megan, probably one from Cueball coming up.

I hope I'm wrong, though.

Also...

Latent22 wrote:Thanks everyone for helping with the party!

Welcome...
I have the impression, though, that BlitzGirl didn't fully 'get' the time traveling operations we put in place for her, beginning with the request to switch her hat for a beret.
List¹ of all Frames of Time and after Time.
New here? Questions? Check the wiki.
Don't worry, feed molpies⁴.
Image
Holy Croce
Default footnotes; standard OTT-np2166m 1.2:
Spoiler:
Image
Image

User avatar
Caswallon
Posts: 229
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2013 10:04 pm UTC
Location: Seattle wa
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby Caswallon » Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:30 pm UTC

dreiarmumig wrote:
Caswallon wrote:
Latent22 wrote:Thanks everyone for helping with the party!
Your Welcome!
Sorry, couldn't resist.
Spoiler:
Image
Well don't I feel silly now, How dare you! ;)
histrion wrote:"Gunaxf gb gur Grzcbeny Vyyhzvangv, zl jbex cebqhpgvivgl unf qrpernfrq qenzngvpnyyl! Gunaxf, Rayvtugrarq Barf!"

Precepter and historian of the Chruch of the Newpage. achoo

User avatar
KarMann
As far as the hats go, I think it's safe to say that I'm pretty well set. Unless my hat, pre-dating Time itself, needs a hat of its own??
Posts: 916
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:38 am UTC
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA, far from river and sea
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby KarMann » Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:36 pm UTC

Flado wrote:
lmjb1964 wrote:Please, no discussions about whether backwards-R is a vowel, or a diphthong, etc...

Happy to oblige ;-) "backwards-R", being Cyrillic Я, is clearly a vowel. Or a diphthong. I'm not sure. We have 6 vowels, and neither Ю nor Я were among them at the time. The sounds are like "yu" and "ya", respectively, so maybe they are diphthongs. I wish I knew the difference, but now I must transcend to coma again, even before catching up. I feel blitzy.

I'm not great with Russian, but I think basically, if they're alone or at the beginning of a word, or following certain consonants or one of those palatization modifiers, they'd be a true diphthong. But, if they're following one of the usual consonants, they wouldn't be, and modify the pronunciation of the preceding consonant instead, kind of like '~' in Spanish & Portuguese.
P.S. I am Randall, but not that Randall.
We can rebuild it. We have the technology. We can make it better than it was. Better … stronger … well, maybe not faster.
Well, BlitzGirl is experiencing a bit of a title wave.
Magdiragdag wrote:I wait for it, therefore I am.
Illud expecto, ergo sum.

User avatar
ChronosDragon
Posts: 1848
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:42 am UTC
Location: [~]

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby ChronosDragon » Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:37 pm UTC

Comawalltext time!

Caswallon wrote:
dreiarmumig wrote:
Caswallon wrote:
Latent22 wrote:Thanks everyone for helping with the party!
Your Welcome!
Sorry, couldn't resist.
Spoiler:
Image
Well don't I feel silly now, How dare you! ;)


Don't kid you'reself, your sure to to better in life if you're yours are sorted.*

Purplepants77 wrote:
1"We" refers to the group of individuals or bots that are following this needle-pulled-thingy at any given point in Time. "We" is a legally binding contract and is subject to change at any Time. "We" assumes no liability.


Implying the individuals make bots to follow the thread? Or the individuals become bots following the thread? Or the individuals are replaced by bots who read the thead? :shock:

descor wrote:
Ptarr wrote:
Megan wrote:bye.
Is this the end of time?

Oh please, say it ain't so!


Your drug is a heartbreaker.

(I can't hear that phrase without thinking of that anymore, not since I played Rock Band and heard this song far too many times...)

airdrik wrote:
azule wrote:OH NOES!!! MEGAN'S GONE FOR REALS! ALL HOPE IS GONE! MEGANPOCALYPSE!!

Wait, Gone? you mean like Gone gone? She isn't really Gone gone, is she? She's just gone, but not gone gone, right? They will be coming back again, right? .. Right?!?


She couldn't possibly be! She *sniffle* she's a main *sob* character, Randall wouldn't *choke sob* dare change the cast of the comic *breakdown into tears*

Randall willing, that won't be the end of M&C's arc!

*This sentence physically hurt to write
Image

User avatar
azule
Saved
Posts: 2113
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:45 pm UTC
Location: The land of the Golden Puppies and Rainbows

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby azule » Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:41 pm UTC

airdrik wrote:
azule wrote:OH NOES!!! MEGAN'S GONE FOR REALS! ALL HOPE IS GONE! MEGANPOCALYPSE!!

Wait, Gone? you mean like Gone gone? She isn't really Gone gone, is she? She's just gone, but not gone gone, right? They will be coming back again, right? .. Right?!?

Well, you still have BlitzGirl to look forward to. *pat-pat*
Image

If you read this sig, post about one arbitrary thing you did today.

I celebrate up to six arbitrary things before breakfast.
Time does drag on and on and contain spoilers. Be aware of memes.

User avatar
jjjdavidson
Posts: 652
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 1:40 pm UTC
Location: Outside: The Ozarks, North America ─ OTTside: Lost in the 1400s

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby jjjdavidson » Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:44 pm UTC

Okay, I'm a little freaked out now. No, I'm a lot freaked out.

Everybody's wondered, How did Randall generate the hashes? I thought about Externalities and the hash everyone was trying to break there, a Skein 1024 1024 hash.

But that's a 128-byte hash (256 hex digits) and the file names are only 32-byte (64 digits). But then I thought, Would it be so un-Randallish to generate a 1024-bit hash and only use 256 bits? So I wrote a script to test the Externalites hash against the Time image folder, taking 64 hex digits at a time for the image name. 192 failures, then this, with the very last 64 digits of the hash.

I don't know how many frames in the future this is, but here's:
b567aa3e2390a573a373a48a5e676640c79cc70197e1c5e7f902fb53ca1858b6.png
Spoiler:
Image
So you see why I'm freaked out.

Edit: 192 failures, not 184. Duh.
Last edited by jjjdavidson on Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:49 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.
Don't worry. Feed squirpys.
Don't wait for me.
My OTC/OTT graphsMay include spoilers!
Helpful links: Time Wiki FAQrot-13 / Morse decoders
He won! He won! He won!
Knight Temporal. :) Ex-Loopist. :(

User avatar
dreiarmumig
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 1:33 pm UTC

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby dreiarmumig » Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:50 pm UTC

jjjdavidson wrote:
Spoiler:
Okay, I'm a little freaked out now. No, I'm a lot freaked out.

Everybody's wondered, How did Randall generate the hashes? I thought about Externalities and the hash everyone was trying to break there, a Skein 1024 1024 hash.

But that's a 128-byte hash (256 hex digits) and the file names are only 32-byte (64 digits). But then I thought, Would it be so un-Randallish to generate a 1024-bit hash and only use 256 bits? So I wrote a script to test the Externalites hash against the Time image folder, taking 64 hex digits at a time for the image name. 184 failures, then this, with the very last 64 digits of the hash.

I don't know how many frames in the future this is, but here's:
b567aa3e2390a573a373a48a5e676640c79cc70197e1c5e7f902fb53ca1858b6.png
[spoiler]ImageSo you see why I'm freaked out.


Woah.
Last edited by dreiarmumig on Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:04 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
lmjb1964
Posts: 2173
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 7:09 pm UTC
Location: In the Present! Need to ketchup NP 2236-2280, plus NP 2026-2058 and something like 2060-2090+?.

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby lmjb1964 » Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:55 pm UTC

dreiarmumig wrote:
Spoiler:
Caswallon wrote:
Latent22 wrote:Thanks everyone for helping with the party!
Your Welcome!



Sorry, couldn't resist.
Image


Hee-hee

Flado wrote:
lmjb1964 wrote:Please, no discussions about whether backwards-R is a vowel, or a diphthong, etc...

Happy to oblige ;-) "backwards-R", being Cyrillic Я, is clearly a vowel. Or a diphthong. I'm not sure. We have 6 vowels, and neither Ю nor Я were among them at the time. The sounds are like "yu" and "ya", respectively, so maybe they are diphthongs. I wish I knew the difference, but now I must transcend to coma again, even before catching up. I feel blitzy.


D'oh! Fine, if you're going to go there, I would say that the backwards R in Toys backwards-R Us (That's how Dave Barry writes it, so it works for me), or Flags backwards-R Us, is not the same thing as the Cyrillic Я. Otherwise, it would be pronounced Toy Ya Us instead of Toys R Us. And that would make no sense.
Image

Help addams stay in her home! https://www.crowdrise.com/in-a-comically-tragic-turn-of-events-addams-didnt-die
Imagesmiley by yappo
That's a robot but it totally counts. Image

bot by balthasar_s

User avatar
Caswallon
Posts: 229
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2013 10:04 pm UTC
Location: Seattle wa
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby Caswallon » Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:56 pm UTC

jjjdavidson wrote:
Spoiler:
Okay, I'm a little freaked out now. No, I'm a lot freaked out.

Everybody's wondered, How did Randall generate the hashes? I thought about Externalities and the hash everyone was trying to break there, a Skein 1024 1024 hash.

But that's a 128-byte hash (256 hex digits) and the file names are only 32-byte (64 digits). But then I thought, Would it be so un-Randallish to generate a 1024-bit hash and only use 256 bits? So I wrote a script to test the Externalites hash against the Time image folder, taking 64 hex digits at a time for the image name. 184 failures, then this, with the very last 64 digits of the hash.

I don't know how many frames in the future this is, but here's:
b567aa3e2390a573a373a48a5e676640c79cc70197e1c5e7f902fb53ca1858b6.png
ImageSo you see why I'm freaked out.

Holy Crap!
Spoiler:
I would believe this a bit more if any of the EXIF data matched up, or if you actually pointed at http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/time/ :wink:
histrion wrote:"Gunaxf gb gur Grzcbeny Vyyhzvangv, zl jbex cebqhpgvivgl unf qrpernfrq qenzngvpnyyl! Gunaxf, Rayvtugrarq Barf!"

Precepter and historian of the Chruch of the Newpage. achoo

User avatar
Eternal Density
Posts: 5377
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 12:37 am UTC
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby Eternal Density » Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:02 pm UTC

It won't be long, I belong,
Somewhere past the setting sun

Finally free, finally strong,
Somewhere back where I belong

User avatar
mscha
Posts: 6700
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:21 pm UTC
Location: NL
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby mscha » Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:03 pm UTC

QUAPHTHONG...
Image

Edit: Just some barely visible sea level rise.
Spoiler:
Image
Last edited by mscha on Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:06 pm UTC, edited 2 times in total.
List¹ of all Frames of Time and after Time.
New here? Questions? Check the wiki.
Don't worry, feed molpies⁴.
Image
Holy Croce
Default footnotes; standard OTT-np2166m 1.2:
Spoiler:
Image
Image

User avatar
Eternal Density
Posts: 5377
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 12:37 am UTC
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby Eternal Density » Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:05 pm UTC

Looks like I picked an extremely suspenseful time to catch up after being preoccupied Outside by ANZAC Day goings-on. But happily it is not over and I can breath a sigh of relief.
And yay, I'm on the List of Hatting :D

User avatar
ChronosDragon
Posts: 1848
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:42 am UTC
Location: [~]

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby ChronosDragon » Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:06 pm UTC

jjjdavidson wrote:I don't know how many frames in the future this is, but here's:
b567aa3e2390a573a373a48a5e676640c79cc70197e1c5e7f902fb53ca1858b6.png
Spoiler:
Image
So you see why I'm freaked out.


Well played, my friend, well played.

So has anyone actually tried to break the hash?
Image

User avatar
mscha
Posts: 6700
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:21 pm UTC
Location: NL
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby mscha » Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:09 pm UTC

ChronosDragon wrote:So has anyone actually tried to break the hash?

I believe the consensus is that IMO it's probably not actually a hash, but just a random ID, so there's nothing to break.

Edit: no consensus, I guess...
Last edited by mscha on Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:21 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.
List¹ of all Frames of Time and after Time.
New here? Questions? Check the wiki.
Don't worry, feed molpies⁴.
Image
Holy Croce
Default footnotes; standard OTT-np2166m 1.2:
Spoiler:
Image
Image

User avatar
htom
Posts: 357
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 6:13 am UTC
Location: Twin Cities, MN, USA

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby htom » Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:14 pm UTC

ChronosDragon wrote:
jjjdavidson wrote:I don't know how many frames in the future this is, but here's:
b567aa3e2390a573a373a48a5e676640c79cc70197e1c5e7f902fb53ca1858b6.png
Spoiler:
Image
So you see why I'm freaked out.


Well played, my friend, well played.

So has anyone actually tried to break the hash?


Not so much tried to break as thought about it. I think for each image n it's the hash of the path on the drive(s) devoted to Time-1190 image n. So he can update images as much as he wants, doesn't change the hash. Each path is different, so each hash will be different. Once the image is first retrieved, it's stored somewhere else as hash(n).png . If he makes changes, he issues a command to resync the images. The hashes don't change, everything else can.
cmyk wrote:How can I be so riveted to the Internet equivalent of watching grass grow?

Questions? Spoilers! TimeWiki, geekwagon, The Book of Aubron, ExplainXKCD
mscha wrote:We can ignore reality; in fact, we'll have to, since only Randall knows what it is.

User avatar
Caswallon
Posts: 229
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2013 10:04 pm UTC
Location: Seattle wa
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby Caswallon » Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:15 pm UTC

mscha wrote:
ChronosDragon wrote:So has anyone actually tried to break the hash?

I believe the consensus is that it's probably not actually a hash, but just a random ID, so there's nothing to break.

I actually believe it is a hash, but likely seeded and would be very difficult to crack. However the random attack approach suggested by jjjdavidson is not an entirely bad idea, but would likely be detected very easily and shutdown. Plus, if it is a seeded hash, it would be very easy for Randall to then change the seed and essentially all of the image links.
histrion wrote:"Gunaxf gb gur Grzcbeny Vyyhzvangv, zl jbex cebqhpgvivgl unf qrpernfrq qenzngvpnyyl! Gunaxf, Rayvtugrarq Barf!"

Precepter and historian of the Chruch of the Newpage. achoo

User avatar
cmyk
Posts: 326
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:54 pm UTC
Location: Somewhere beyond the sands of time... In other words, Detroit MI.
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby cmyk » Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:16 pm UTC

jjjdavidson wrote:Okay, I'm a little freaked out now. No, I'm a lot freaked out.

Everybody's wondered, How did Randall generate the hashes? I thought about Externalities and the hash everyone was trying to break there, a Skein 1024 1024 hash.

But that's a 128-byte hash (256 hex digits) and the file names are only 32-byte (64 digits). But then I thought, Would it be so un-Randallish to generate a 1024-bit hash and only use 256 bits? So I wrote a script to test the Externalites hash against the Time image folder, taking 64 hex digits at a time for the image name. 184 failures, then this, with the very last 64 digits of the hash.

I don't know how many frames in the future this is, but here's:
b567aa3e2390a573a373a48a5e676640c79cc70197e1c5e7f902fb53ca1858b6.png
Spoiler:
Image
So you see why I'm freaked out.


:shock:

Spoiler:
You alllllmost had me. ;)
Image

"If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour... you're gonna see some serious shit." —Doc Brown

"I... can't describe it. This... means something... this... is important." –Roy Neary

User avatar
Caswallon
Posts: 229
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2013 10:04 pm UTC
Location: Seattle wa
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby Caswallon » Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:18 pm UTC

htom wrote:
ChronosDragon wrote:<snip/>So has anyone actually tried to break the hash?
Not so much tried to break as thought about it. I think for each image n it's the hash of the path on the drive(s) devoted to Time-1190 image n. So he can update images as much as he wants, doesn't change the hash. Each path is different, so each hash will be different. Once the image is first retrieved, it's stored somewhere else as hash(n).png . If he makes changes, he issues a command to resync the images. The hashes don't change, everything else can.
I would suggest similar, but likely using a database to contain the images instead of a path. Easier management of the images, and how/when they render. This could also potentially show the behaviors with the image EXIF Data that has been noted earlier.
histrion wrote:"Gunaxf gb gur Grzcbeny Vyyhzvangv, zl jbex cebqhpgvivgl unf qrpernfrq qenzngvpnyyl! Gunaxf, Rayvtugrarq Barf!"

Precepter and historian of the Chruch of the Newpage. achoo

User avatar
SBN
Saved
Posts: 2106
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 7:15 pm UTC
Location: No longer in the home of the raptorcats, now in the home of the raptorcats.

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby SBN » Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:42 pm UTC

lmjb1964 wrote:D'oh! Fine, if you're going to go there, I would say that the backwards R in Toys backwards-R Us (That's how Dave Barry writes it, so it works for me), or Flags backwards-R Us, is not the same thing as the Cyrillic Я. Otherwise, it would be pronounced Toy Ya Us instead of Toys R Us. And that would make no sense.

I've been calling it We-Be-Toys, but I like Toys Ya Us so I may switch. Does the s in toys go away, or was that a typo? I want to get my incorrect store name right, after all.
astrotter wrote:It is not particularly clear to me at this time that we are not overanalyzing this...

Randalspeed thunk, iskinner, and other blitzers! Notes from the before-was improve the after-when.
Some Ways to Time
NetWeasel wrote:I want to put that in my sig... BUT I CAN'T!!!!

User avatar
Valarya
Posts: 975
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 4:27 pm UTC
Location: Nashville

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby Valarya » Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:44 pm UTC

ChronosDragon wrote:<snip>

Don't kid you'reself, your sure to to better in life if you're yours are sorted.*

*This sentence physically hurt to write


It hurt so bad* to read, to*. ><

Intentional.
Last edited by Valarya on Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:48 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.
Caridnal of Cupcakes | Friaress of Frosting | Pope of Pocket Pastries
Occasional basement dweller.

Image

User avatar
azule
Saved
Posts: 2113
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:45 pm UTC
Location: The land of the Golden Puppies and Rainbows

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby azule » Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:46 pm UTC

^"too", not "to". The hurt continues.

Anyone tried generating random hashes of the appropriate length and seeing if they exist on the server?

p.s. I wouldn't want to peek, just curious.
Image

If you read this sig, post about one arbitrary thing you did today.

I celebrate up to six arbitrary things before breakfast.
Time does drag on and on and contain spoilers. Be aware of memes.

User avatar
dreiarmumig
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 1:33 pm UTC

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby dreiarmumig » Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:55 pm UTC

azule wrote:I wouldn't want to peek, just curious.

That sounds a bit contradictory.

User avatar
BytEfLUSh
Posts: 308
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:15 am UTC
Location: Sombor, Serbia, Pizza
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby BytEfLUSh » Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:57 pm UTC

azule wrote:Anyone tried generating random hashes of the appropriate length and seeing if they exist on the server?


I may be wrong in my calculations, but let's assume there are 1 000 000 frames on the server and we bomb it with requests 1 000 000 times per second. The chance of loading an actual frame within one year is cca. 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003%
Last edited by BytEfLUSh on Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:43 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Image

-- Professor Dan, The Man from Earth (paraphrased)

User avatar
dreiarmumig
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 1:33 pm UTC

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby dreiarmumig » Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:02 am UTC

RIGGA-DIGGA-DING-DONG-SONG
Image

User avatar
mscha
Posts: 6700
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:21 pm UTC
Location: NL
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby mscha » Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:03 am UTC

Uh oh, sea wall collapse. (No sea level rise, though.)
Time_sea_level_rise_20130426_0000.png
Time_sea_level_rise_20130426_0000.png (1.51 KiB) Viewed 7286 times
List¹ of all Frames of Time and after Time.
New here? Questions? Check the wiki.
Don't worry, feed molpies⁴.
Image
Holy Croce
Default footnotes; standard OTT-np2166m 1.2:
Spoiler:
Image
Image

User avatar
Caswallon
Posts: 229
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2013 10:04 pm UTC
Location: Seattle wa
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby Caswallon » Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:06 am UTC

BytEfLUSh wrote:
azule wrote:Anyone tried generating random hashes of the appropriate length and seeing if they exist on the server?


I may be wrong in my calculations, but let's assume there are 1.000.000 frames on the server and we bomb it with requests 1.000.000 times per second. The chance of loading an actual frame within one year is cca. 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003%

Huh, mine say 0.00000002%. So that seems much more likely
Edit: totally missed a power, my calculations match up.
Last edited by Caswallon on Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:12 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.
histrion wrote:"Gunaxf gb gur Grzcbeny Vyyhzvangv, zl jbex cebqhpgvivgl unf qrpernfrq qenzngvpnyyl! Gunaxf, Rayvtugrarq Barf!"

Precepter and historian of the Chruch of the Newpage. achoo

User avatar
azule
Saved
Posts: 2113
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:45 pm UTC
Location: The land of the Golden Puppies and Rainbows

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby azule » Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:07 am UTC

This semenwall is crap. Too bad.

dreiarmumig wrote:
azule wrote:I wouldn't want to peek, just curious.

That sounds a bit contradictory.

I don't know what you mean. I wouldn't look. Maybe. I just want to know how good you guys are.

BytEfLUSh wrote:
azule wrote:Anyone tried generating random hashes of the appropriate length and seeing if they exist on the server?


I may be wrong in my calculations, but let's assume there are 1.000.000 frames on the server and we bomb it with requests 1.000.000 times per second. The chance of loading an actual frame within one year is cca. 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003%

But is that for real? It is not possible to just be lucky and see where that gets us?
Image

If you read this sig, post about one arbitrary thing you did today.

I celebrate up to six arbitrary things before breakfast.
Time does drag on and on and contain spoilers. Be aware of memes.

User avatar
Latent22
Posts: 622
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:57 pm UTC
Location: NZ

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby Latent22 » Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:08 am UTC

Did a bit more investigation into the Modified dates but didn't find anything much useful.

Code: Select all

wget "http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/time/c47e36a518ab34230553d695eb4d4be0bbee134d003a6c9a9acdd585c4b7b014.png" --output-document=Times883.dat  --save-header


This wget command gets the image and also the http headers and the headers have the following:

Spoiler:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Via: 1.1 NAME_OF_MY_WEBPROXY
Connection: Keep-Alive
Proxy-Connection: Keep-Alive
Content-Length: 11276
Age: 214
Expires: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 23:25:08 GMT
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 23:23:42 GMT
Content-Type: image/png
ETag: "3278645104"
Server: VoxCAST
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Last-Modified: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 05:31:13 GMT
Cache-Control: public, max-age=300
X-Cache: HIT from VoxCAST
Keep-Alive: timeout=5, max=47


The only interesting bit is the Last-Modified: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 05:31:13 GMT bit.

This date is exactly the same down to the second on all frames.

This tells us the date modified of the file stored on the web servers.

Note this date lines up with the change that was made on the 22nd when he modified all the images with the mod times of 2013-04-22 01:07:25-04:00. Note you need to add 4 hours to the 1:07:25 to get it to UTC/GMT.

speising
Posts: 1892
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 4:54 pm UTC
Location: wien

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby speising » Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:09 am UTC

azule wrote:This semenwall is crap. Too bad.

dreiarmumig wrote:
azule wrote:I wouldn't want to peek, just curious.

That sounds a bit contradictory.

I don't know what you mean. I wouldn't look. Maybe. I just want to know how good you guys are.

BytEfLUSh wrote:
azule wrote:Anyone tried generating random hashes of the appropriate length and seeing if they exist on the server?


I may be wrong in my calculations, but let's assume there are 1.000.000 frames on the server and we bomb it with requests 1.000.000 times per second. The chance of loading an actual frame within one year is cca. 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003%

But is that for real? It is not possible to just be lucky and see where that gets us?


sure, why not, a million to one chances crop up nine out of ten times, after all.

User avatar
Latent22
Posts: 622
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:57 pm UTC
Location: NZ

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby Latent22 » Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:12 am UTC

azule wrote:But is that for real? It is not possible to just be lucky and see where that gets us?

Are you win lotto 10 times in a row lucky? if so start guessing ;)

Edit: my guess at 10 lotto's was a bit off sorry. based on the lottery we have here in New Zealand anyway which is 1/3, 838, 380 chance of winning (bigger countries have harder to win lotteries with bigger prizes of course). So the chance of winning 9 NZ lotto's in a row is the same chance as guessing the hash if you tried 1,000,000 a second for about a month. so all you need to do is buy 9 random lotto over 9 weeks and if you win on all of them then start hitting the server for a month! And you will find ONE future frame! Good luck!
Edit2: by the way if you don't win all 9 lotteries but only say 8 of them then your not lucky enough and don't bother trying the hashs. But you are welcome to donate some of your winnings to me anyway!

User avatar
buffygirl
Cardinal
Posts: 736
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:09 pm UTC
Location: BuffyDashery closed.

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby buffygirl » Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:39 am UTC

cmyk wrote:
jjjdavidson wrote:Okay, I'm a little freaked out now. No, I'm a lot freaked out.

Everybody's wondered, How did Randall generate the hashes? I thought about Externalities and the hash everyone was trying to break there, a Skein 1024 1024 hash.

But that's a 128-byte hash (256 hex digits) and the file names are only 32-byte (64 digits). But then I thought, Would it be so un-Randallish to generate a 1024-bit hash and only use 256 bits? So I wrote a script to test the Externalites hash against the Time image folder, taking 64 hex digits at a time for the image name. 184 failures, then this, with the very last 64 digits of the hash.

I don't know how many frames in the future this is, but here's:
b567aa3e2390a573a373a48a5e676640c79cc70197e1c5e7f902fb53ca1858b6.png
Spoiler:
Image
So you see why I'm freaked out.


:shock:

Spoiler:
You alllllmost had me. ;)

You people are sooooo gullible!

richP
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 3:28 pm UTC

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby richP » Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:43 am UTC

It's not the end until the view pans out and over the sandcastles...
Spoiler:
And we see that the sandcastles spell out "goodbye" when seen from above.
Ask an old person, kids!

User avatar
AluisioASG
Posts: 2300
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:43 am UTC
Location: Forever asleep in a splendid cradle
Contact:

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby AluisioASG » Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:47 am UTC

richP wrote:It's not the end until the view pans out and over the sandcastles...
Spoiler:
And we see that the sandcastles spell out "goodbye" when seen from above.
Ask an old person, kids!

or SOS
Can't see addams on the right? Message me!Image

Randallspeed on your blitz, january1may! Save the Present!

User avatar
Valarya
Posts: 975
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 4:27 pm UTC
Location: Nashville

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby Valarya » Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:47 am UTC

azule wrote:^"too", not "to". The hurt continues.


Um, honey: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xECUrlnXCqk
Caridnal of Cupcakes | Friaress of Frosting | Pope of Pocket Pastries
Occasional basement dweller.

Image

User avatar
jjjdavidson
Posts: 652
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 1:40 pm UTC
Location: Outside: The Ozarks, North America ─ OTTside: Lost in the 1400s

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby jjjdavidson » Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:47 am UTC

Caswallon wrote:
mscha wrote:
ChronosDragon wrote:So has anyone actually tried to break the hash?

I believe the consensus is that it's probably not actually a hash, but just a random ID, so there's nothing to break.

I actually believe it is a hash, but likely seeded and would be very difficult to crack. However the random attack approach suggested by jjjdavidson is not an entirely bad idea, but would likely be detected very easily and shutdown. Plus, if it is a seeded hash, it would be very easy for Randall to then change the seed and essentially all of the image links.

I don't know whether the image names are a hash or a random string, but I don't believe they're related to file content, and probably not to the sequence numbers. Back around frame 255 or so, the comic page was returning two different file names, depending on how fast you captured the image--but both names returned the same image.

Nevertheless, I seriously had to wonder if Time and Externalities were linked somehow (especially since nobody's yet figured out the data for the Externalities-hash). I really did test all 193 contiguous 64-digit substrings of the E-hash, and likewise the reversed E-hash. No joy. (I'm still thinking about variants like every fourth digit, every fourth bit, and so on.)

Not that I expected to get anything back, anyway--at least not any future image. After all, it's pretty trivial coding to have the next image uploaded to the image server just in time; that's standard practice for most of the webcomics out there, where the next image name is often quite predictable. (Skin Horse doesn't, I've discovered, but each of their file names includes a few words of an ongoing story, so they're not easy to predict.)

vvn
Posts: 228
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:34 am UTC

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby vvn » Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:50 am UTC

buffygirl wrote:
vvn wrote:
HAL9000 wrote:Maybe it's Asteroid B-612.

From "Le petit prince":
The narrator explains that, as a young boy, he once drew a picture of a boa constrictor with an elephant digesting in its stomach; however, every adult who saw the picture would mistakenly interpret it as a drawing of a hat.
I want that hat!

Pour toi 1

1 EXCEPT THAT YOU DON'T NEED ANOTHER HAT!!! *pouts*

EDIT: Just aesthetic stuff.

No, I don't. I love my hat. I was just overwhelmed by the idea of a hat with an elephant inside. I am glad to see the image. Thank you. Besides, an elephant might make me capsize.

User avatar
Soup
Posts: 299
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 3:47 pm UTC
Location: The Comfy Chair

Re: 1190: "Time"

Postby Soup » Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:57 am UTC

Many thanks to mscha and any and all other members of the "Guild of People Who Know How to Do That Red/ Green Pixel Thing!" I would be blind by now if I had to gauge caffeinatedsemencancerbabybaconicesea-levels on my own. :wink:
Waiting for it...

Go username5243, musthavebeenmykarma, Rakhal, thunk!!


Return to “Individual XKCD Comic Threads”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests