plytho wrote:Yes, and I said I did not understand what you meant by it, so please answer.
What? I mean it’s ok for you to prod me, but following that comment I’m noting an example of where I think you’ve got it wrong. What is unclear about that? Reference entire read:
bessie wrote:plytho – Subtly prodding me the entire game, ok. Pretending he doesn’t understand the post counts is odd enough, but why be against something that is encouraging content? Don’t like his page 4 interaction with Mark, feels to me like plytho is trying to steer the conversation toward something that is not going to be that important in determining the lynch. But it also feels like many conversations I have had with him, regardless of either of our alignments, so will reanalyze how I feel tomorrow.
plytho wrote:That's not really your style. Also doesn't make a lot of sense to ask for three posts instead of one.
See underlined in above quote.
plytho wrote:I don't quite understand why they're the same, but I think I kind of read over "and he knows it" the first time. This was mostly meant as a joke because "Mark - Playing exactly like normal. I feel though, that this time he is actually scum. " Sounds exactly like something moody would say.
My post was pointing out Mark was aware he is presenting his content to cultivate a specific interpretation. I spelled it out in my previous post, two posts above the one to which you are referring:
bessie wrote:I think part of the issue is that you are now self aware of what other players might consider typical of you.
I interpreted your remark in that you were pointing out the same thing.
moody7277 wrote:Well, one more reason to hate vote shenanigans.
Conditional Fos bessie and wam.
What shenanigans? Per the rules, there was no way to force No Lynch. And I wasn’t putting anything even close.
Unofficial Votals after
I moved my vote (a few minutes before deadline):
wam (2) : MasterOfAll, Mark_Cangila
MasterOfAll (3) : Sabrar, BoomFrog, bessie
Madge (5) : SuicideJunkie, LaserGuy, moody7277, wam, plytho
Not voting : Madge, mpolo
So moody, why the conditional FoS of me?
wam on the other hand. . . Nice safe pseudo bus there wam. Pre-post edit: or was it because you didn’t want to end the day with a vote on town?
bessie wrote:plytho I'm on my phone will reply to yo D2 if I'm here.
Looking forward to it, although I'm a bit taken aback by the strength of your response to what I felt was some light prodding.
I took the day off of work, was out Christmas shopping and made the mistake of bringing my husband, and was trying to get him a beer so he would chill out and I could finally have a chance to check the thread. The above comment was meant to be informational so that you knew I wasn’t at my computer and you didn’t assume I was ignoring your post.
Final D1 post count, including confirmation posts:
I have nothing I feel like claiming.
So wam, how about those cop results?