Topology Resources
Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates
Topology Resources
Does anyone know a good resource (book, lecture series, etc.) for topology? Preferably with a cost of less than $50.
 Yakk
 Poster with most posts but no title.
 Posts: 11106
 Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:27 pm UTC
 Location: E pur si muove
Re: Topology Resources
Algebraic, Pointset, introductory, what?
One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision  BR
Last edited by JHVH on Fri Oct 23, 4004 BCE 6:17 pm, edited 6 times in total.
Last edited by JHVH on Fri Oct 23, 4004 BCE 6:17 pm, edited 6 times in total.

 Posts: 154
 Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 4:29 am UTC
Re: Topology Resources
Topology, by James Munkres. Apparently it's much more expensive than I remembered, but I'm sure you can find a used copy much cheaper than that.
 Cleverbeans
 Posts: 1378
 Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 1:16 pm UTC
Re: Topology Resources
I found Toplogy: PointSet and Geometric by Paul L. Shick to be an excellent introductory text for selfstudy. The scope and presentation of the content is significantly different than Munkres book, so either may be appropriate based on your interests and background.
"Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration."  Abraham Lincoln
Re: Topology Resources
All right, thanks.
Yakk: Probably introductory.
Yakk: Probably introductory.
 Yakk
 Poster with most posts but no title.
 Posts: 11106
 Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:27 pm UTC
 Location: E pur si muove
Re: Topology Resources
There is always Rudin:
http://www.amazon.com/PrinciplesMathem ... pd_sim_b_2
which doesn't coddle you and covers (pointset) topology from the direction of analysis if I remember correctly. (note: I am not kidding about coddling, and book is mainly an analysis book)
Given the lack of answer, I'm guessing you want pointset.
Is there a purpose beyond 'topology is cool'? (and it is cool, but there might be other reasons!)
http://www.amazon.com/PrinciplesMathem ... pd_sim_b_2
which doesn't coddle you and covers (pointset) topology from the direction of analysis if I remember correctly. (note: I am not kidding about coddling, and book is mainly an analysis book)
Given the lack of answer, I'm guessing you want pointset.
Is there a purpose beyond 'topology is cool'? (and it is cool, but there might be other reasons!)
One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision  BR
Last edited by JHVH on Fri Oct 23, 4004 BCE 6:17 pm, edited 6 times in total.
Last edited by JHVH on Fri Oct 23, 4004 BCE 6:17 pm, edited 6 times in total.
Re: Topology Resources
As long as I can understand it without any prior knowledge of topology, it should be all right.
As for why, I'm trying to cover a few of the math topics with applications in physics.
As for why, I'm trying to cover a few of the math topics with applications in physics.
 Yakk
 Poster with most posts but no title.
 Posts: 11106
 Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:27 pm UTC
 Location: E pur si muove
Re: Topology Resources
Ah. So you want to go from topology to basic analysis to differential topology, take a gander at lie groups, maybe not category theory, some algebraic topology to understand how "topological sameness" is detected... Information theory (shannon entropy etc) will also be useful if you want to have a foundation for thermodynamics from the discrete side.
The foundations of the above will require rings, groups, fields, linear algebra (reasonably theoretical), basic analysis (to keep yourself sane when you are doing the more advanced stuff)
Does that seem reasonable? Some of the above is beyond me (I am still wrestling with Lie group theory), but it all looks connected to physics from my perspective.
The foundations of the above will require rings, groups, fields, linear algebra (reasonably theoretical), basic analysis (to keep yourself sane when you are doing the more advanced stuff)
Does that seem reasonable? Some of the above is beyond me (I am still wrestling with Lie group theory), but it all looks connected to physics from my perspective.
One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision  BR
Last edited by JHVH on Fri Oct 23, 4004 BCE 6:17 pm, edited 6 times in total.
Last edited by JHVH on Fri Oct 23, 4004 BCE 6:17 pm, edited 6 times in total.
 doogly
 Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
 Posts: 5507
 Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
 Location: Lexington, MA
 Contact:
Re: Topology Resources
Armstrong's Basic Topology is a great place to start. The neat little Dover books, Counterexamples in Topology and Counterexamples in Analysis are also really delightful.
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?
Re: Topology Resources
Yakk wrote:The foundations of the above will require rings, groups, fields, linear algebra (reasonably theoretical), basic analysis (to keep yourself sane when you are doing the more advanced stuff)
Linear algebra, I got, sorta. Group theory? If that's what you mean, I know a bit. What do you mean with rings and fields?
 doogly
 Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
 Posts: 5507
 Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
 Location: Lexington, MA
 Contact:
Re: Topology Resources
Generally algebra books treat all three of those things, with a 1 semester course paying most attention to groups. I'd be surprised though if a book you used for that didn't also have some discussion of rings and fields a bit later.
Rings and Fields add more structure to a set in addition to the group operation. Rings have a second operation, but not every element has an inverse under the 2nd operation. Fields do.
To get going in algebraic topology, you are actually pretty fine only having studied groups. The most important things in algebraic topology are the homotopy, homology and cohomology groups. You could get through the intro in Armstrong and probably through most (all?) of Hatcher's Algebraic Topology without much more. Hatcher is also fabulous, I should mention, though you'd want to do a basic thing first.
Rings and Fields add more structure to a set in addition to the group operation. Rings have a second operation, but not every element has an inverse under the 2nd operation. Fields do.
To get going in algebraic topology, you are actually pretty fine only having studied groups. The most important things in algebraic topology are the homotopy, homology and cohomology groups. You could get through the intro in Armstrong and probably through most (all?) of Hatcher's Algebraic Topology without much more. Hatcher is also fabulous, I should mention, though you'd want to do a basic thing first.
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?
 Yakk
 Poster with most posts but no title.
 Posts: 11106
 Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:27 pm UTC
 Location: E pur si muove
Re: Topology Resources
You need a bit of ring & field theory for linear algebra and to get your chops set up for understanding algebraic structures (like sigma algebras etc). But really, ring/field/group intro courses tend to be bundled together. Groups are the simplest, structurewise, but seem to be the one with the richest theory that connects to physics.
Group theory is needed for Lie groups and symmetry groups and the like, which is apparently pretty huge in theoretical physics.
Ie, the monster moonshine conjecture, which connects the largest simple group (with ~ 8E54 elements) to string theory and elliptic curves, was proven in 1998.
http://www.daviddarling.info/encycloped ... cture.html
When you see string theory talk about objects like E8, they are talking about group theory (I think!)
For lie groups, look at this google: http://google.com/search?q=lie+groups+and+physics
Which also contains this link: http://superstringtheory.com/math/math2.html a guide to what kinds of math someone who wants to understand/research theoretical physics needs.
Group theory is needed for Lie groups and symmetry groups and the like, which is apparently pretty huge in theoretical physics.
Ie, the monster moonshine conjecture, which connects the largest simple group (with ~ 8E54 elements) to string theory and elliptic curves, was proven in 1998.
http://www.daviddarling.info/encycloped ... cture.html
When you see string theory talk about objects like E8, they are talking about group theory (I think!)
For lie groups, look at this google: http://google.com/search?q=lie+groups+and+physics
Which also contains this link: http://superstringtheory.com/math/math2.html a guide to what kinds of math someone who wants to understand/research theoretical physics needs.
One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision  BR
Last edited by JHVH on Fri Oct 23, 4004 BCE 6:17 pm, edited 6 times in total.
Last edited by JHVH on Fri Oct 23, 4004 BCE 6:17 pm, edited 6 times in total.
 doogly
 Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
 Posts: 5507
 Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
 Location: Lexington, MA
 Contact:
Re: Topology Resources
Oh yes, all that stuff is exceedingly useful for further work in physics.
Especially if you don't want to be "that guy" who uses math without understanding it. Go ask your average physicist what a Hilbert space is actually defined as, and watch the squirms.
Especially if you don't want to be "that guy" who uses math without understanding it. Go ask your average physicist what a Hilbert space is actually defined as, and watch the squirms.
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?
 Marbas
 Posts: 1169
 Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 4:01 am UTC
 Location: Down down down at the bottom of the sea
 Contact:
Re: Topology Resources
Ah. So you want to go from topology to basic analysis
There are actually books with this basic progression in mind I believe. For example, I have Topology for Modern Analysis from Dover, and it has proved pretty useful. I know there's a more well regarded title in this vein, but currently it's escaping me.
Jahoclave wrote:Do you have any idea how much more fun the holocaust is with "Git er Done" as the catch phrase?

 Posts: 129
 Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:06 am UTC
Re: Topology Resources
Perhaps you should look at Calculus on Manifolds by Spivak, or Introduction to Manifolds by Loring Tu.
Re: Topology Resources
So anything I read will probably cover rings and fields, is that right?
EDIT: Turns out I didn't know what a group was, but I found a site that explained groups, rings, and fields, so never mind, then.
Well, thanks for the suggestions. This'll keep me busy over break, I guess.
EDIT: Turns out I didn't know what a group was, but I found a site that explained groups, rings, and fields, so never mind, then.
Well, thanks for the suggestions. This'll keep me busy over break, I guess.
Re: Topology Resources
Would you mind posting a link, Arariel? I happen to be interested in the same stuff.
I like to tackle some of the more advanced stuff in my spare time, since I might be going into math and/or theoretical physics.
I like to tackle some of the more advanced stuff in my spare time, since I might be going into math and/or theoretical physics.
Hi.
Re: Topology Resources
If you didn't know what a group was, you're probably not ready for Algebraic Topology by Hatcher. It is, however, cheap and/or available free online. It's quickly becoming the standard graduate textbook
Re: Topology Resources
Mapar wrote:Would you mind posting a link, Arariel? I happen to be interested in the same stuff.
I like to tackle some of the more advanced stuff in my spare time, since I might be going into math and/or theoretical physics.
http://www.quadibloc.com/math/abaint.htm
bobdylan wrote:If you didn't know what a group was, you're probably not ready for Algebraic Topology by Hatcher. It is, however, cheap and/or available free online. It's quickly becoming the standard graduate textbook
Well, I know what they are now. Do you have a link?
 doogly
 Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
 Posts: 5507
 Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
 Location: Lexington, MA
 Contact:
Re: Topology Resources
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?
 Yakk
 Poster with most posts but no title.
 Posts: 11106
 Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:27 pm UTC
 Location: E pur si muove
Re: Topology Resources
Rings and Fields is both about getting acquainted with them, and working on algebraic proof chops.
Knowing what ideals are, understanding what "modding out" does, etc is much easier if you've done it and proven how it works in a comparatively simple framework.
I also suspect "not knowing what a group is" is being used as a proxy.
Knowing what ideals are, understanding what "modding out" does, etc is much easier if you've done it and proven how it works in a comparatively simple framework.
I also suspect "not knowing what a group is" is being used as a proxy.
One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision  BR
Last edited by JHVH on Fri Oct 23, 4004 BCE 6:17 pm, edited 6 times in total.
Last edited by JHVH on Fri Oct 23, 4004 BCE 6:17 pm, edited 6 times in total.
Re: Topology Resources
Yakk wrote:Rings and Fields is both about getting acquainted with them, and working on algebraic proof chops.
Knowing what ideals are, understanding what "modding out" does, etc is much easier if you've done it and proven how it works in a comparatively simple framework.
I also suspect "not knowing what a group is" is being used as a proxy.
In that case, is there anything I can check out for practice problems?
 doogly
 Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
 Posts: 5507
 Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
 Location: Lexington, MA
 Contact:
Re: Topology Resources
There are a bunch of great text books that can help you get a deep understanding of groups, rather than a cursory familiarity. I like Artin's "Algebra" a lot. If you don't have access to a library there are some decent free things you can google too.
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?

 Posts: 129
 Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:06 am UTC
Re: Topology Resources
If you really want to learn algebra, then get Dummit and Foote's Abstract Algebra. It's a staple of any mathematician's library.
 doogly
 Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
 Posts: 5507
 Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
 Location: Lexington, MA
 Contact:
Re: Topology Resources
Eh, I didn't like it as much as Artin, and I certainly wouldn't start with it.
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?
Re: Topology Resources
If we're talking about introductions to abstract algebra for undergraduates, my vote is for Gallian.
Re: Topology Resources
skullturf wrote:If we're talking about introductions to abstract algebra for undergraduates, my vote is for Gallian.
I've been working through Hungerford's undergraduate text (Abstract Algebra: An Introduction) and I like what I've seen more than what I've done in Gallian's text (I used to work through Gallian). The problems are arranged in terms in difficulty, i.e. the A. Problems are easiest, B. Problems are challenging and C. problems are generally quite difficult, unfortunately, you are not given that luxury with Gallian's text. The subjects covered are very "algebraic", symmetry groups and other geometric concepts are not covered very much at all although they are covered. I also think that the material is covered better in Hungerford's text. You can also get a used copy of Hungerford's text for much less money than a used copy of Gallian's text. That said, Gallian's text is by no means a terrible book, and I'm only comparing Hungerford to Gallian because those are the only two abstract algebra texts that I have used.
Re: Topology Resources
Gallian might not be the most encyclopedic algebra text, but it's very userfriendly and a joy to learn from.
Re: Topology Resources
skullturf wrote:Gallian might not be the most encyclopedic algebra text, but it's very userfriendly and a joy to learn from.
I will say that I had fun learning from Gallian's text but I felt that I learned more from Hungerford's and since I was very into math when I started reading Hungerford, I had just as much fun. Since this is more of a topic about Topology, I'll stop my input for now.

 Posts: 129
 Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:06 am UTC
Re: Topology Resources
doogly wrote:Eh, I didn't like it as much as Artin, and I certainly wouldn't start with it.
Well, as I've said before, you're wrong about not liking Dummit and Foote. I can't compare it to Artin, though, as I've never read Artin. But it's one of the big three algebra texts (along with Lang, and Dummit and Foote), so it's probably good. Better to be safe than sorry: buy both.
As for Gallian and Hungerford, I just don't see the need for a specifically undergraduate algebra textbook when Dummit and Foote exists. Dummit and Foote:
1. goes at a very comfortable pace,
2. has lots of fullyworkedthrough examples (making it very suitable for selfstudy),
3. has tons of problems at the end of each section which are very accessible and clearly relate to the section, and
4. covers such a breadth of topics that it will remain useful throughout college, graduate school, and for research purposes.
Re: Topology Resources
I really enjoyed Fraleigh's "A First Course in Abstract Algebra", which goes all the way from the definition of a group to field extensions and Galois theory.
The old edition I had and sadly lost also had a short section on simplicial homology, which is what first got me interested in algebraic topology (I'm now writing my thesis). Unfortunately newer editions seem to have dropped it.
The old edition I had and sadly lost also had a short section on simplicial homology, which is what first got me interested in algebraic topology (I'm now writing my thesis). Unfortunately newer editions seem to have dropped it.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests