Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

For the discussion of math. Duh.

Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates

Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Multiplication
3
33%
Summation
6
67%
 
Total votes: 9

scratch123
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:18 pm UTC

Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby scratch123 » Thu Sep 01, 2011 5:14 pm UTC

Which mathematical concept do you like more? Make sure you don't confuse addition and summation since they are different. Since my last topic comparing opinions on mathematical concepts (lines and curves) went so well I decided to make another one. If this one goes well as well maybe I will make another one in about a week. Idea requests for my next topic are welcome.
Last edited by scratch123 on Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:44 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
gmalivuk
GNU Terry Pratchett
Posts: 26765
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
Location: Here and There
Contact:

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby gmalivuk » Thu Sep 01, 2011 8:03 pm UTC

What?
Unless stated otherwise, I do not care whether a statement, by itself, constitutes a persuasive political argument. I care whether it's true.
---
If this post has math that doesn't work for you, use TeX the World for Firefox or Chrome

(he/him/his)

Anonymously Famous
Posts: 242
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 4:01 am UTC

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby Anonymously Famous » Thu Sep 01, 2011 8:23 pm UTC

I don't know which concept I like more, but summation is more versatile than multiplication. Summation can completely replace multiplication, as if you want xy for some constants x and y, you can just do a summation of y x times (or vice versa). However, with summation, you can do things like sum (n+1), with n going from 1 to 8, and you just don't get that with multiplication.

User avatar
eSOANEM
:D
Posts: 3652
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:39 pm UTC
Location: Grantabrycge

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby eSOANEM » Thu Sep 01, 2011 9:28 pm UTC

Anonymously Famous wrote:Summation can completely replace multiplication


Only if you allow non-integer numbers of iterations (in which case, I'd argue that it's no longer been reduced solely to summation as you need some notion of non-integer iteration).
my pronouns are they

Magnanimous wrote:(fuck the macrons)

coffeesneeze
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:35 am UTC

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby coffeesneeze » Thu Sep 01, 2011 10:02 pm UTC

gmalivuk wrote:What?


Pancakes v. waffles for people slightly more mathematically minded.

I think. I can't really tell, either.

User avatar
Macbi
Posts: 941
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:32 am UTC
Location: UKvia

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby Macbi » Thu Sep 01, 2011 10:13 pm UTC

Otter?
    Indigo is a lie.
    Which idiot decided that websites can't go within 4cm of the edge of the screen?
    There should be a null word, for the question "Is anybody there?" and to see if microphones are on.

Anonymously Famous
Posts: 242
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 4:01 am UTC

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby Anonymously Famous » Fri Sep 02, 2011 3:31 am UTC

eSOANEM wrote:
Anonymously Famous wrote:Summation can completely replace multiplication


Only if you allow non-integer numbers of iterations (in which case, I'd argue that it's no longer been reduced solely to summation as you need some notion of non-integer iteration).

You are, of course, correct. I'd neglected to consider non-integer multiplication. Silly me. As long as one is an integer, though, it still works. If not... Well, it can take the place of multiplication in several instances, so it's still pretty cool.

User avatar
gmalivuk
GNU Terry Pratchett
Posts: 26765
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
Location: Here and There
Contact:

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby gmalivuk » Fri Sep 02, 2011 4:18 am UTC

Macbi wrote:Otter?
Good point.
Unless stated otherwise, I do not care whether a statement, by itself, constitutes a persuasive political argument. I care whether it's true.
---
If this post has math that doesn't work for you, use TeX the World for Firefox or Chrome

(he/him/his)

User avatar
jmorgan3
Posts: 710
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:22 am UTC
Location: Pasadena, CA

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby jmorgan3 » Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:25 am UTC

gmalivuk wrote:
Macbi wrote:Otter?
Good point.

We're not talking about points until next week.
This signature is Y2K compliant.
Last updated 6/29/108

User avatar
Thesh
Made to Fuck Dinosaurs
Posts: 6578
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:55 am UTC
Location: Colorado

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby Thesh » Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:36 am UTC

Anonymously Famous wrote:I don't know which concept I like more, but summation is more versatile than multiplication. Summation can completely replace multiplication, as if you want xy for some constants x and y, you can just do a summation of y x times (or vice versa). However, with summation, you can do things like sum (n+1), with n going from 1 to 8, and you just don't get that with multiplication.


Not in Galois fields you can't!
Summum ius, summa iniuria.

User avatar
jestingrabbit
Factoids are just Datas that haven't grown up yet
Posts: 5967
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:50 pm UTC
Location: Sydney

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby jestingrabbit » Fri Sep 02, 2011 6:05 am UTC

Anonymously Famous wrote:However, with summation, you can do things like sum (n+1), with n going from 1 to 8, and you just don't get that with multiplication.


What?

[math]\prod_{n=1}^8 (n+1) = 9!.[/math]

I otter ducked... this question sucks.
ameretrifle wrote:Magic space feudalism is therefore a viable idea.

User avatar
phlip
Restorer of Worlds
Posts: 7572
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:56 am UTC
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby phlip » Fri Sep 02, 2011 6:12 am UTC

I think that, on balance, I much prefer ducks to curtains. I'm open to being convinced, though.

Code: Select all

enum ಠ_ಠ {°□°╰=1, °Д°╰, ಠ益ಠ╰};
void ┻━┻︵​╰(ಠ_ಠ ⚠) {exit((int)⚠);}
[he/him/his]

User avatar
jestingrabbit
Factoids are just Datas that haven't grown up yet
Posts: 5967
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:50 pm UTC
Location: Sydney

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby jestingrabbit » Fri Sep 02, 2011 6:31 am UTC

Everyone needs their privacy. Quacking is a luxury. Ergo, curtains.
ameretrifle wrote:Magic space feudalism is therefore a viable idea.

dissonant
Posts: 63
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 10:33 am UTC

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby dissonant » Fri Sep 02, 2011 7:33 am UTC

[imath]\ln\left(\prod x_n \right) = \sum \ln\left( x_n \right)[/imath]

Tryss
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 12:16 am UTC

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby Tryss » Fri Sep 02, 2011 8:39 am UTC

dissonant wrote:
[imath]\ln\left(\prod x_n \right) = \sum \ln\left( x_n \right)[/imath]


Actually it's not exactly true

Spoiler:
every [imath]x_n[/imath] need to be positive :twisted:

mfb
Posts: 950
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:48 pm UTC

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby mfb » Fri Sep 02, 2011 8:58 am UTC

Tryss wrote:
Spoiler:
every [imath]x_n[/imath] need to be positive :twisted:

Actually it's not exactly true
Spoiler:
You can define the logarithm on the complex plane (except 0), as long as you are careful about +- 2 pi n



[imath]\ln\left(|\prod x_n| \right) = \sum \ln\left( |x_n| \right)[/imath] to remove all problems.

User avatar
phlip
Restorer of Worlds
Posts: 7572
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:56 am UTC
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby phlip » Fri Sep 02, 2011 11:25 am UTC

The OP made a big thing about not confusing addition with a summation... presumably the same distinction applies to multiplication vs sequence products. So we're comparing the multiplication of a number of individually-specified terms, with the sum of a sequence of values.

Hence my comparison with the "curtains or ducks" bit.

Code: Select all

enum ಠ_ಠ {°□°╰=1, °Д°╰, ಠ益ಠ╰};
void ┻━┻︵​╰(ಠ_ಠ ⚠) {exit((int)⚠);}
[he/him/his]

scratch123
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:18 pm UTC

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby scratch123 » Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:46 pm UTC

Ugh sometimes I really hate mods. Just so you know I did not put that "otter" option into the poll. I edited the poll again to return it to its original state.

User avatar
Dason
Posts: 1311
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 7:06 am UTC
Location: ~/

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby Dason » Fri Sep 02, 2011 3:02 pm UTC

scratch123 wrote:Ugh sometimes I really hate mods. Just so you know I did not put that "otter" option into the poll. I edited the poll again to return it to its original state.

Otter option IS best option.
double epsilon = -.0000001;

User avatar
Cleverbeans
Posts: 1378
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 1:16 pm UTC

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby Cleverbeans » Fri Sep 02, 2011 3:21 pm UTC

scratch123 admits to tampering with the otter vote, and once again democracy fails. For shame.... :evil:
"Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration." - Abraham Lincoln

User avatar
Qaanol
The Cheshirest Catamount
Posts: 3069
Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 11:55 pm UTC

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby Qaanol » Fri Sep 02, 2011 3:51 pm UTC

I voted for dinosaurs.
wee free kings

User avatar
gmalivuk
GNU Terry Pratchett
Posts: 26765
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
Location: Here and There
Contact:

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby gmalivuk » Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:00 pm UTC

scratch123 wrote:Ugh sometimes I really hate mods. Just so you know I did not put that "otter" option into the poll. I edited the poll again to return it to its original state.
If you don't want me adding foolish options to your polls, might I suggest you find things to post about other than foolish polls?
Unless stated otherwise, I do not care whether a statement, by itself, constitutes a persuasive political argument. I care whether it's true.
---
If this post has math that doesn't work for you, use TeX the World for Firefox or Chrome

(he/him/his)

User avatar
MartianInvader
Posts: 808
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 5:51 pm UTC

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby MartianInvader » Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:13 pm UTC

Clearly the summation operotter.
Let's have a fervent argument, mostly over semantics, where we all claim the burden of proof is on the other side!

Yesila
Posts: 221
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:38 am UTC

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby Yesila » Sun Sep 04, 2011 1:01 am UTC

scratch123 wrote:Idea requests for my next topic are welcome.



How about "Ridiculous poll" or "Pointless poll" you can then use those results for the poll after that.

scratch123
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:18 pm UTC

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby scratch123 » Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:58 pm UTC

gmalivuk wrote:
scratch123 wrote:Ugh sometimes I really hate mods. Just so you know I did not put that "otter" option into the poll. I edited the poll again to return it to its original state.
If you don't want me adding foolish options to your polls, might I suggest you find things to post about other than foolish polls?


Whats so foolish about it? Are you not allowed to have opinions about abstract concepts?

User avatar
gmalivuk
GNU Terry Pratchett
Posts: 26765
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
Location: Here and There
Contact:

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby gmalivuk » Fri Sep 09, 2011 2:22 pm UTC

You can have opinions on anything you want. That's not the same as wanting to create a silly poll about every single one of them. If you don't actually have something mathematical to discuss, I fail to see why you need to create a thread in the mathematics forum.

Also, who are you to declare that my opinion about an abstract concept cannot be "otter"?
Unless stated otherwise, I do not care whether a statement, by itself, constitutes a persuasive political argument. I care whether it's true.
---
If this post has math that doesn't work for you, use TeX the World for Firefox or Chrome

(he/him/his)

scratch123
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:18 pm UTC

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby scratch123 » Fri Sep 09, 2011 3:18 pm UTC

gmalivuk wrote:You can have opinions on anything you want. That's not the same as wanting to create a silly poll about every single one of them. If you don't actually have something mathematical to discuss, I fail to see why you need to create a thread in the mathematics forum.

Also, who are you to declare that my opinion about an abstract concept cannot be "otter"?


So is making polls discouraged here or something? Polls do give you something to discuss since in addition to voting you can give reasons as to why you think that way. I think talking about the subjective parts of math is important.

Yesila
Posts: 221
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:38 am UTC

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby Yesila » Sat Sep 10, 2011 5:54 am UTC

scratch123 wrote:So is making polls discouraged here or something?


This poll, and the lines and curves one, seems almost troll-y to me though. You give very little context on what exactly you are wanting people to compare about two topics both of which are fundamental and (one could argue) indispensable.

Spoiler:
New Poll!

What would you rather stop doing? Breathing? Or having a pulse?

See what I mean?

User avatar
doogly
Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
Posts: 5531
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
Location: Lexington, MA
Contact:

Re: Multiplication or the summation operator (sigma)

Postby doogly » Sat Sep 10, 2011 4:55 pm UTC

Duck.
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.

Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?


Return to “Mathematics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests